Skip to main content
Log in

Liquefaction Resistance and Cyclic Response of Air Injected-Desaturated Sandy Soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Desaturation of in-situ saturated sandy soils is emerging as a new cost effective and environment friendly liquefaction mitigation technique. In the present study, stress controlled undrained cyclic triaxial tests have been conducted on air injected-desaturated sandy soil and various important issues such as number of cycles required for initial liquefaction, cyclic strength of desaturated sand, modes of failure, evolution of pore pressure, have been explored in detail. Number of cycles required for initial liquefaction increased exponentially with decrease in degree of saturation. Cyclic strength of desaturated sand with degree of saturation of 80% is found to be twice that of saturated sand, for relative density of 40%. Assessment of performance of desaturated sand under various earthquake records revealed that desaturated sand with degree of saturation of 70% can prevent liquefaction during moderate to strong earthquakes having peak ground acceleration as high as 0.30 g. Further, sample with high degree of saturation underwent cyclic mobility failure. In samples with low degree of saturation, two types of cyclic softening failures demarcated by two distinct phase transformation trends were observed. A pore pressure model proposed by Konstadinoun and Georgiannou (2014) has been modified to predict the pore pressure evolution in desaturated sand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a max :

Peak horizontal acceleration at the ground surface;

B :

Skempton’s pore pressure parameter;

D r :

Relative density of the sample;

g :

Gravitational acceleration;

K s :

Bulk modulus of soil skeleton;

K w :

Bulk modulus of water;

N :

Number of loading cycles;

N i :

Number of cycles required for initial liquefaction;

n :

Porosity of the sample;

p′ :

Effective mean stress;

q :

Deviatoric stress;

r u :

Pore pressure ratio;

S :

Degree of saturation of the sample;

u a :

Absolute pore fluid pressure;

σ′c :

Effective confining pressure at the end of consolidation;

σv :

Total vertical pressure;

σ′v :

Effective vertical pressure

References

  • ASTM:D5311/D5311M-13 (2013) Standard Test Method for Load Controlled Cyclic Triaxial Strength of Soil. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/D5311.

  • Black D, Lee K (1973) Saturating laboratory samples by back pressure. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div 99(SM1):75–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker, J. R., Rahman, M. S. and Seed, H. B. (1976) GADFLEA: A computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation during cyclic or earthquake loading Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California.

  • Boominathan A, Hari S (2002) Liquefaction strength of fly ash reinforced with randomly distributed fibers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:1027–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celestino V, Kenneth H (2012) Seismic measurements in sand specimens with varying degrees of saturation using piezoelectric transducers. Can Geotech J 685(152):671–685. https://doi.org/10.1139/T2012-033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eseller-bayat E, Yegian MK, Alshawabkeh A (2013) Liquefaction response of partially saturated Sands. i: experimental results. J Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng 139(6):863–871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund DG, Rahardjio H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils, JOHN WILEY & SONS. JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(93)90011-F

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goto, S. and Shamoto, Y. (1987) ‘Estimation method for the liquefaction strength of unsaturated sandy soil (part 2)’, in 37th Jpn. Nat. Conf. Geotech. Engrg.

  • He J, Chu J (2012) (2014) ‘Undrained Responses of Microbially Desaturated Sand under Monotonic Loading.’ Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140:04014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Chu J, Ivanov V (2013) Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas. Géotechnique 63(4):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Tsuchiya, H. and Ishihara, K. (1999) ‘Estimation of partial saturation effect on liquefaction resistance of sand using P-wave velocity.’, in Proc. JGS Symp (Vol. 113), pp. 431–434.

  • Idriss, I. M. (1997) ‘Evaluation of liquefaction potential and consequences: Historical perspective and updated procedure’, in Presentation notes, 3rd Short Course on Evaluation and Mitigation of Earthquake Induced Liquefaction Hazards. San Francisco.

  • Idriss, I. M. (1999) ‘An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential’, in TRB Worshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction Pubbl. n. FHWA-RD-99–165, Federal Highway Administation.

  • Idriss, I. M. and Boulanger, R. . (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. EERI.

  • Ishibashi I, Sherif MA, Tsuchiya C (1977) Pore-pressure rise mechanism and soil liquefaction. Soils Found 17(2):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, I., Sherif, M. A. and Cheng, W. L. (1982) ‘The effects of soil parameters on pore-pressure-rise and liquefaction prediction.’, Soils and Foundations, 22(1), pp. 39–48.

  • Ishihara, K. (1996) Soil Behavoiur in Earthquake Geotechnics. Oxford Science Publications.

  • Ishihara, K et al. (2001) ‘Keynote Lecture: Recent Studies on Liquefaction Resistance of Sand-Effect of Saturation’, in Fourth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.

  • Ishihara, K. et al. (2001) ‘Recent studies on liquefaction resistance of sand-effect of saturation’, in 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.

  • Ishihara, M., Okamura, M. and Oshita, T. (2003) ‘Desaturating sand deposit by air injection for reducing liquefaction potential’, Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering., (89).

  • Iwasaki T, Arakawa T, Tokida KI (1984) Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Int J Soil Dynamics Earthquake Eng 3(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato K, Nagao K (2020) Numerical evaluation of liquefaction resistance for desaturated sands. J Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Eng 146(6):04020037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (2000) Correlation of pore-pressure B- value with P-wave velocity and poisson’s ratio for imperfectly saturated sand or gravel. Soils Found 40(4):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.37.3229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstadinou M, Georgiannou VN (2014) Prediction of pore water pressure generation leading to liquefaction under torsional cyclic loading. Soils and Foundations. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, S. L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. PEARSON.

  • Lade, P. V (2016) Triaxial Testing of Soils. First edit. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • Likos, W. J. and Jaafar, R. (2013) ‘Pore-Scale Model for Water Retention and Fluid Partitioning of Partially Saturated Granular Soil’ doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000811.

  • Marasini NP, Okamura M (2015a) Air injection to mitigate liquefaction under light structures. Int J Phys Modelling Geotechnics 15(3):129–140. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.14.00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marasini NP, Okamura M (2015b) Numerical simulation of centrifuge tests to evaluate the performance of desaturation by air injection on liquefiable foundation soil of light structures. Soils and Foundations Elsevier 55(6):1388–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura M, Soga Y (2006) Effects of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand. Soils Foundations Japanese Geotechnical Society 46(5):695–700. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura M, Ishihara M, Tamura K (2006) Degree of saturation and liquefaction resistances of sand improved with sand compaction pile. J Geotechnical Geoenviron Eng 132(2):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(258)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura M et al (2011) In-situ desaturation test by air injection and its evaluation through field monitoring and multiphase flow simulation. J Geotechnical Geoenviron Eng 137(7):643–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietruszczak S, Pande GN, Oulapour M (2003) A hypothesis for mitigation of risk of liquefaction. Géotechnique 53(9):833–838. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.9.833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad NS, Wayne Clough G (1984) New procedure for saturating sand specimens. J Geotechnical Geoenviron Eng 110(9):1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:9(1205)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, S. (no date) What is Triaxial Testing? Part one: Introduction to Triaxial Testing GDS. Accessed Januray 2017. Available at: www.gdsinstruments.com.

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Foundations Division 97(9):1249–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B., P., M. P. and Lysmer, J. (1976) ‘Pore-water pressure changes during soil liquefaction’, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 102(Proc. Paper# 12074).

  • Sherif MA, Tsuchiya C, Ishibashi I (1977) Saturation effects on initial soil liquefaction. J Geotech Eng Div 103(8):914–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Géotechnique 4(4):143–147. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sze HY, Yang J (2014) Failure Modes of Sand in Undrained Cyclic Loading: Impact of Sample Preparation. Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takemura, J. et al. (2009) ‘Centrifuge model tests on soil desaturation as a liquefaction countermeasure’, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: The Academia and Practice of Geotechnical Engineering, doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-502.

  • Unno T et al (2008) Liquefaction of unsaturated sand considering the pore air pressure and volume compressibility of the soil particle skeleton. Soils Found 48(1):87–99. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Sivathayalan S (1996) Static and cyclic liquefaction potential of Fraser Delta sand in simple shear and triaxial tests. Can Geotech J 33(2):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin L et al (2016) Small-strain shear modulus of volcanic granular soil: An experimenation investigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 86:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Savidis S, Roemer M (2004) Evaluating liquefaction strength of partially saturated sand. J Geotech Eng Division 130(9):975–979. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:9(975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, S. et al. (1999) ‘Effect of degree of saturation on the liquefaction strength of Masa’, in 34th Japanese National Conference Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 2071–2072.

  • Yegian MK et al (2007) Induced-partial saturation for liquefaction mitigation: experimental investigation. J Geotechnical Geoenviron Eng 133(4):372–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(372)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimi Y, Tanaka K, Tokimatsu K (1989) Liquefaction resistance of a partially saturated sand. Soils Found 29(3):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeybek, A. and Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2016) ‘Centrifuge testing to evaluate the liquefaction response of air-injected partially saturated soils beneath shallow foundations’, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. Springer Netherlands, pp. 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9968-6.

  • Zeybek A, Madabhushi GSP (2017a) Durability of partial saturation to counteract liquefaction. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 170(2):102–111. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.16.00025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeybek A, Madabhushi SPG (2017b) ‘In fl uence of air injection on the liquefaction-induced deformation mechanisms beneath shallow foundations’, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Elsevier Ltd 97(February):266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeybek A, Madabhushi GSP, Pelecanos L (2020) ‘Seismic response of partially saturated soils beneath shallow foundations under sequential ground motions’, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Netherlands 18(5):1987–2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00792-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanaji Chavan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chavan, D., Sitharam, T.G. & Anbazhagan, P. Liquefaction Resistance and Cyclic Response of Air Injected-Desaturated Sandy Soil. Geotech Geol Eng 40, 1851–1872 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01996-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01996-5

Keywords

Navigation