Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of Subsurface Structures and Dynamic Modulus Determination Based on Downhole Seismic Surveys (Case Study)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic features of the site are studied in earthquake prone areas. In these studies, the seismic design parameters of the site are determined based on geological and geotechnical engineering features. In this regard, part of the building regulations (European Standard) is related to site classification. In order to classify the land, the bylaws provide various methods such as mean shear wave velocity up to 30 m depth. In the present study, the values of the dynamic modulus of layers are calculated using conventional relationships based on the values of wave velocities for different depths. In this study, data from 22 boreholes, in which Downhole Seismic surveys were performed, were identified and implemented to identify subsurface layers and to determine the dynamic modulus in the area. The results of these studies in land classification were used to evaluate the site effect based on European Standard. The results show that the area under study is classified in class B according to this standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

V p :

Compressional wave velocity (m/s)

V s :

Shear wave velocity (m/s)

G :

Shear modulus (stiffness) (GPa)

E :

Young's modulus (GPa)

K :

Bulk modulus (GPa)

\(\left( {\frac{{V_{p} }}{{V_{s} }}} \right)^{2} = \frac{2 - 2\nu }{{1 - 2\nu }}\) :

Square of the wave velocity ratio

n :

Porosity

ν:

Poisson's ratio

ρ :

Density (gr/cm3)

λ :

Lame constant

References

  • Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008) Site characterization studies of Bangalore using a geophysical method. In: Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization. Taylor & Francis Group, London

  • ASTM D7400/D7400M-19 (2019) Standard test methods for downhole seismic testing. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. www.astm.org

  • Boominathan A (2004) Seismic site characterization for nuclear structures and power plants. J Curr Sci 87–10:1388–1397

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood RL, Castagna JP (1983) Basis for interpretation of Vp/Vs ratios in complex lithologies. In: SPWLA 24th annual logging symposium. Society of petrophysicists and well-log analysts

  • Eurocode CEN (1998: 2004) 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1

  • Hajizadeh F, Mirzaee Nezhad A (2015) Check subsurface layer of Orumiyeh city by using seismic. J Math Technol 6:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi TS, Salamat A, Mohamadi A (2012) Soil classification using shear wave velocity in Shiraz city based on building codes.

  • Luna R, Jadi H (2000) Determination of dynamic soil properties using geophysical methods. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on the application of geophysical and NDT methodologies to transportation facilities and infrastructure—geophysics, vol 3. pp 1–15

  • Pickett GR (1963) Acoustic character logs and their applications in formation evaluation. J Pet Technol 15:659–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpel H, Kahlar S, Meissner R, Millereit B (1984) The use of seismic shear waves compressional waves for lithological problems of shallow sediments. Geophys Prospect 32:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei SH, Salamat AS, Ghalandasrzadeh A, Riahi MA, Beitollahi A, Talebian M (2010) Preparation of engineering geological maps of Bam city using geophysical and geotechnical approach. J Earthq Eng 14(4):559–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1997) Chapter III: surface geophysical methods. In: Expedited site assessment tools for underground storage tanks: a guide for regulators, EPA 510-B-970001, office of underground storage tanks, United States Environmental Protection Agency

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author greatly appreciates the support of Isfahan Region's Metro Company which enabled the data acquisition. We appreciate the critical reading by arbitration committee and we will be acknowledging our gratitude for enlightening suggestion and insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farnusch Hajizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This article is based on the results of the master. On behalf of all the authors, the author stated that there was no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatrayi, H., Hajizadeh, F. & Taghavi, B. Identification of Subsurface Structures and Dynamic Modulus Determination Based on Downhole Seismic Surveys (Case Study). Geotech Geol Eng 39, 5279–5289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01831-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01831-x

Keywords

Navigation