Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Lime and Polymer Treated Ultra-Soft Clay Soils Using the Modified Vane Shear and Correlating the Shear Strengths to the Electrical Resistivity and CIGMAT Miniature Penetrometer for Nondestructive Field Tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growth in construction along the coastal regions, ports and offshore deepwater sea beds, ultra soft clay soils are encountered and are affecting the performance of the pipelines and other anchor systems placed in it. In this study, untreated and treated ultra-soft clay soils shear strengths were quantified using the modified vane shear device and correlated the shear strength to the CIGMAT miniature penetrometer penetration and electrical resisitivity. The ultra-soft clay soils were prepared by varying the bentonite content from 2 to 10%. The soil with 10% bentonite was treated with 2–10% lime and with 1–10% polymer separately to enhance the shear strength. The shear strength, pH, CIGMAT miniature penetrometer and electrical resistivity were used to characterize the untreated and treated ultra-soft clay soils. Untreated soft soil strength varied from 0.01 to 0.17 kPa when the bentonite content in the ultra-soft clay soil was increased from 2 to 10%. With 2% lime treatment the shear strength of 10% bentonite soil was increased to 0.27 kPa. Adding 10% lime to the 10% bentonite ultra-soft soil reduced the shear strength to 0.15 kPa. With 10% polymer treatment, the shear strength was increased by 45 times to 6.8 kPa for the 10% bentonite ultra-soft soil. The CIGMAT miniature penetrometer penetration varied linearly with the shear strength of the untreated ultra-soft clay soils and treated ultra-soft clay soils with 10% bentonite. pH was almost constant for untreated ultra-soft clay soils while it increased by 22% and 35% for the 10% lime and 10% polymer treated ultra-soft clay soilss respectively. Relative electrical resistivity decreased by 246% when the bentonite content was increased from 2 to 10% in the ultra-soft clay soils. Addition of 10% of lime to the ultra-soft clay soil with 10% of bentonite content decreased the relative electrical resistivity by 171%. Addition of 10% of polymer to the ultra-soft clay soil with 10% of bentonite content reduced the relative electrical resistivity by 545%. Power law, linear and Vipulanandan correlation models were used to predict the shear strength-resistivity relationship for the untreated, lime-treated and polymer-treated ultra-soft clay soils respectively. In addition, linear model was used to predict the water content relationship with electrical resistivity for the untreated and treated ultra-soft clay soils. The CIGMAT miniature penetrometer was modeled using 3-D axisymmetric finite element method, which predicted the penetration of CIGMAT penetrometer that agreed well with the experimental results of the untreated and treated ultra-soft clay soils. The CIGMAT miniature penetrometer penetration and the electrical resisitivity monitoring are two non-destructive methods that can be easily adopted in the field and the property correlations can be used to determine the shear strength of the ultra-soft caly soils in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Hassanein AC, Benson CH, Blotz LR (1996) Electrical resistivity of compacted clays. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali FH, Adnan A, Choy CK (1992) Geotechnical properties of a chemically stabilized soil from malaysia with rice husk ash as an additive. Geotech Geol Eng 10:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos MJ (1977) Classification and engineering properties of dredged material, technical report D-77-18. U.S Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo MW, Choa V, Wong KS (2010) Constant rate of loading test on ultra-soft clay soils. Geotech Test J 33(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande A (1958) Notes on the design of the liquid limit device. Geotechnique 8(2):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJong J, Yafrate N, DeGroot D (2011) Evaluation of undrained shear strength using full-flow penetrometers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(1):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins RA, Markus A (1998) New development in offshore geotechnical investigations. In: Proceeding international conference offshore site investigations and foundation behavior, SUT, London, pp. 259–276

  • Hebib S, Farrell ER (2003) Some experiences on the stabilization of irish peats. Can Geotech J 40:102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GW, Hamilton TW, Ebelhar RJ, Mueller JL, and Pelletier JH (1988) Comparison of in situ vane, cone penetrometer and laboratory test results for Gulf of Mexico deepwater clays, Vane Shear Strength Testing of Soils, Field and Laboratory Studies, ASTM STP 1014, pp. 293-305

  • Kaya A, Fang HS (1997) Identification of contaminated soils by dielectric constant and electrical conductivity. J Environ Eng 123(2):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheiri P, Vipulanandan C (2014) New model to predict the rate of pipeline penetration into the very soft clays simulating deepwater subsea conditions, pipeline conference 2014, ASCE, CD Proceeding - 2014

  • Lei H, Wang X, Chen L, Huang M, Han J (2016) Compressive characteristics of ultra soft clays subjected to simulated staged preloading. KSCE J Civil Eng 20:718–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low H, Lunne K, Andersen M, Li X, Randolph M (2010) Estimation of intact undrained shear strength from penetration tests in soft clays. Geotechnique 11:843–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunne T (2001) In situ testing in offshore geotechnical investigations. In: Proceeding international conference on in situ measurement of soil properties and case histories, Bali, pp. 61–81

  • De Meyer CP, Mahlerbe B (1987) Optimisation of maintenance dredging operations in maritime and estuarine areas. Terra et Aqua, Int J Public Works Ports Waterw Dev Intl Assoc Dredg Co 35:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed AS, Vipulanandan C (2014) Compressive and tensile behavior of polymer treated sulfate contaminated CL soil. Geotech Geol Eng 32:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntohar AS (2004) Uses of RHA to enhanced lime-stabilized clay soil. In: International conference on geotechnical engineering, Sharjah, UAE, pp. 356–357

  • Nader A, Fall M, Hache R (2015) Characterization of sensitive marine clays by using cone and ball penetrometers: example of clays in eastern Canada. Geotech Geol Eng 33:841–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj HB, Sridharan A, Mallikarjuna HM (2012) Re-examination of undrained strength at Atterberg limits water contents. Geotech Geol Eng 30(2):727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman LEJ (1958) A comparison of values of liquid limit determined with apparatus having bases of different hardness. Géotechnique 8(2):79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad N, Lunne T (1986) Correlations between piezocone results and laboratory soil properties. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui FI, Osman S (2012) Integrating geo-electrical and geotechnical data for soil characterization. Int J Appl Phys Math 2(2):104–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW, Northey RD (1952) The sensitivity of clays. Geotechnique 3:30–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart D, Randolph M (2001) A new site investigation tool for the centrifuge, In: Proceedings of the international conference modelling. Balkema Pub, The Netherlands, pp. 531–538

  • Tchameni AP, Zhao L, Ribeiro JXF, Ting Li T (2018) Evaluating the thermal effect on the rheological properties of waste vegetable oil biodiesel modified bentonite drilling muds using Vipulanandan model. High Temp High Press 34:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Teh CI, Houlsby GT (1991) An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay. Geotechnique 41(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2016) XRD and TGA, swelling and compacted properties of polymer treated sulfate contaminated CL Soil. J Test Eval 44(6):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vipulanandan C, Prashanth P (2013) Impedance spectroscopy characterization of a piezoresistive structural polymer composite bulk sensor. J Testing Eval 41(6):898–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Vipulanandan, C. and Chockalingam, C. (2018a) Corrosion detection and quantification real-time using the new nondestructive test with vipulanandan impedance corrosion model, In: Proceedings, American Association of Drilling Engineers (AADE) 2018, AADE-18-FTCE-116

  • Vipulanandan C, Kim MS, Harendra S (2007a) Microstructural and geotechnical properties of Houston-Galveston area soft clays, In: Proceedings (CD), advances in measurements and modeling of soil behavior, GSP 173. ASCE

  • Vipulanandan C, Ahossin Guezo J, Bilgin O (2007b) Geotechical properties of marine and deltaic soft clays, In: Proceedings (CD), advances in measurements and modeling of soil behavior, GSP 173. ASCE

  • Vipulanandan C, Yanhouide AJ, Joshaghani SM (2013b) Deepwater axial and lateral sliding pipe-soil interaction model study Proceedings (CD), ASCE Pipeline Conference-2013

  • Vipulanandan C, Raheem AM (2015) Characterizing ultra-soft clay soilss and anchor-soil interaction for deepwater applications, In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international ocean and polar engineering conference Kona, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, June 21–26, pp. 1048–1054

  • Vipulanandan C, Maddi AR, Ganpatye A (2018b) Smart spacer fluid modified with iron oxide nanoparticles for in-situ property enhancement was developed for cleaning oil based drilling fluids and characterized using the vipulanandan rheological model, Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) 2018, OTC-28886-MS

  • Vipulanandan C, Ali K (2018c) Smart cement grouts for repairing damaged piezoreisitve cement and performance predicted using vipulanandan models, J Mater Civil Eng, ASCE (In Press)

  • Wroth CP, Wood DM (1978) The correlation of index properties with some basic engineering properties of soils. Can Geotech J 15(2):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AG, McClelland B, Quiros GW (1988) In situ vane testing at sea, Vane shear strength testing of soils: field and laboratory studies, ASTM STP 1014, pp. 46-67

  • Youseff MS, El Ramli AH, El Demery M (1965) Relationships between shear strength, consolidation, liquid limit, and plastic limit for remoulded clays. In: Proceedings 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, 1. Montreal, pp. 126–129

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Center for Innovative Grouting Materials and Technology (CIGMAT) and Texas Hurricane Center for Innovative Technology (THC-IT), University of Houston, Houston, Texas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cumaraswamy Vipulanandan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raheem, A.M., Vipulanandan, C. Characterization of Lime and Polymer Treated Ultra-Soft Clay Soils Using the Modified Vane Shear and Correlating the Shear Strengths to the Electrical Resistivity and CIGMAT Miniature Penetrometer for Nondestructive Field Tests. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 3047–3063 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01677-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01677-3

Keywords

Navigation