Skip to main content
Log in

Insight into the Effect of Fine Content on Liquefaction Behavior of Soil

  • State-of-the-Art Review
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper presents different approaches which includes plasticity based criteria that helps in distinguish between liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils deposits having fine content. A brief review of the previous work has been mentioned to emphasise on the need of new parameters for liquefaction susceptibility of clayey soils. Clay content, liquid limit and water content are considered as key parameters that helps in liquefaction assessment. Several recommendations proposed by prominent researchers are described here to present wide range of plasticity index, liquid limit and other parameters that affects liquefaction behaviour of clayey soil significantly. But the differences in the range of plasticity index leads to confusion and misperception in determination of liquefaction susceptibility of fine grained soil. One of the high seismic zone site is analyzed using different approach which consider fine content of soil mass. It is found that for a better and proper segregation of the layers Bray and Sancio criteria may be adopted which uses plasticity as one of its input parameter and clearly differentiate site in between liquefiable, non-liquefiable and sites that may liquefy i.e. moderately liquefiable. This summarizes that plasticity is one of the significant criteria which draws a clear differentiating line between liquefiable and non-liquefiable soil deposits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhila M, Rangaswamy K, Sankar N (2019) Undrained response and liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures. J Geotech Geol Eng Springer 37(4):2729–2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DCA, Martin GR (2000) Criteria for liquefaction of silty soils Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.

  • Bilsel H, Erhan G, Durgunoglu T (2010) Assessment of liquefaction/cyclic failure potential of alluvial deposits on the eastern coast of cyprus. In: International conferences on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics.

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2004) Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays Rep. UCD/CGM-04/01, Univ. of Calif., Davis, Calif.

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2006) Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 132(11):1413–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Sancio RB (2006) Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine grained soil. J Geotech Eng 132(9):1165–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Sancio RB, Durgunoglu T, Onalp A, Youd TL, Stewart JP, Seed RB, Cetin OK, Bol E, Baturay MB, Christensen C, Karadayilar T (2004) Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in Adapazari, Turkey, International conference on geotechnical earthquake engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(7):673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash HK, Sitharam TG (2010) Undrained monotonic response of sand-silt mixtures: effect of nonplastic fines. J Geomech Geoeng Int J 6(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash HK, Sitharam TG, Baudet AB (2010) Influence of non-plastic fines on the response of a silty sand to cyclic loading. Soils Found 50(5):695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn WD (1991) Assessment of liquefaction potential and post liquefaction behavior of earth structures: developments 1981–1991. In: Proc. second international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, 2, St Louis, 1883–1850.

  • Gratchev I, Sassa K, Fukuoka H (2006) How reliable is the plasticity index for estimating the liquefaction potential of clayey sands? J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 132(1):124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T, Prakash S (2000) Liquefaction of silt-clay mixtures In: Proc. 12th World conference on earthquake engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand,

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger R (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(2):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behavior in earthquake engineering. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Koseki J (1989) Cyclicshear strength of fines-containing sands, Earthquake and Geotech. Engg. Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, pp 101–106

  • Koester JP (1992) The influence of test procedure on correlation of Atterberg limits with liquefaction in fine-grained soils. Geotech Test J 15(4):352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krim A, Arab A, Chemam M, Brahim A, Sadek M, Shahrour I (2019) Experimental study on the liquefaction resistance of sand–clay mixtures: Effect of clay content and grading characteristics. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 37(2):129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1407974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marto A, Tan CS, Makhtar AM, Ung SW, Lim MY (2015) Effect of plasticity on liquefaction susceptibility of sand-fines mixtures. Appl Mech Mater 773–774:1407–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S-S, Kim Y-S (2013) Liquefaction resistance of sands containing plastic fines with different plasticity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paydar NA, Ahmadi MM (2016) Effect of fines type and content of sand on correlation between shear wave velocity and liquefaction resistance. Geotech Geol Eng 34(6):1857–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polito C (2001) Plasticity based liquefaction criteria. In: Proc. of the 4th intl. Conf. on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics.

  • Prakash S, Puri V K (2010) Recent advances in liquefaction of fine grained soils. In: Fifth international conference, San Diego, California.

  • Prakash S, Sandoval JA (1992) Liquefaction of low plasticity silts. J Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engg 71(7):373–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash S, Guo T, Kumar S (1998) Liquefaction of silts and silt-clay mixture. In: Proc. 1998 Spec. Conf. on Geotech. Earthq. Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Seattle, WA, vol 1, pp 327–348

  • Puri VK (1984) Liquefaction behaviour and dynamic properties of loessial (silty) soils, PhD Dissertation, University of Missouri–Rolla, Mo.

  • Sandoval J (1989) Liquefaction and settlement characteristics of silt soils, PhD Dissertation, University of Missouri–Rolla, Mo.

  • Seed HB (1979) Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 105(GT2):201–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(SM8):1249–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Founclations Div ASCE 92(SM6):105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109(3):458–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES (2001) Recent advances in soil liquefaction hazard assessment. In: 15th ICSMGEG, TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES, Kammerer AM, Wu J, Pestana JM, Riemer MF, Sancio RB, Bray JD, Kayen RE, Faris A (2003) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent framework, EERC-2003–06. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Umar SK, Samui P, Kumari S (2018) Deterministic and Probabilistic analysis of liquefaction for different regions of Bihar. Geotech Geol Eng 36(5):3311–3321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W (1979) Some Findings in Soil Liquefaction. Report Water Conservancy and Hydro-electric Power Scientific Research Institute, Beijing, China, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijewickreme D, Sanin M (2004) Cyclic shear loading response of Fraser River Delta Silt. In: Proc., 13th World Conf. on EQ Engineering, Mira Digital Publishing, Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 499.

  • Wijewickreme D, Sanin MV, Greenaway GR (2005) Cyclic shear response of fine-grained mine tailings. Can Geotech J 42:1408–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL (1998), Screening guide for rapid assessment of liquefaction hazard at highway bridge sites. MCEER-98-0005

  • Zhou SG (1987) Soil liquefaction during recent major earthquakes in China and aseismic design method related to soil liquefaction In: Proc. 8th Asian Regional Conference on SM&FE, vol. II, pp. 249–250.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunita Kumari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghani, S., Kumari, S. Insight into the Effect of Fine Content on Liquefaction Behavior of Soil. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 1–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01491-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01491-3

Keywords

Navigation