Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical Treatment of a Highly Expansive Clay Using a Liquid Ionic Soil Stabilizer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expansive soils for residential projects are often treated with liquid ionic soil stabilizer (LISS) using deep pressurized injection method. Liquid ionic soil stabilizers have a long history of application in practice. However, there is limited knowledge and experimental evidence of their stabilization mechanism and effectiveness. This paper summarizes the research that investigated the effects of liquid ionic stabilizers on key engineering properties of a highly expansive clay from Carrollton, Texas, through comprehensive physical and mechanical testing and microscopic observation of untreated and treated soils. Test results before and after treatment were analyzed for two different treatment ratios: 1:300 and 1:150, showing a 53% swell reduction for treated soil compacted at the optimum moisture content (OMC) for treated soil, and 25% swell reduction for treated soil compacted at the OMC for the untreated soil. There was no significant improvement in unconfined compressive strength; noticeable improvement in stiffness was observed. The microscopic analysis showed a marked change in morphology and quantitative element composition, thus suggesting the occurrence of a reasonable degree of stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carter DL, Heilman MD, Gonzalez CL (1965) Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether for determining surface area of silicate minerals. Soil Sci 100(5):356–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman HD (1965) Cation-exchange capacity. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis-Chemical and microbiological properties. SSSA, Madison, pp 891–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittoori BC (2008) Clay mineralogy effects on long-term performance of chemically treated expansive clays. University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, p 326

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyal RS, Hendricks SB (1950) Total surface of clays in polar liquids as a characteristic index. Soil Sci 69(6):503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He S (2018) Expansive soil treatment with ionic soil stabilizer. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2672:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D (1998) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing clay soils. J Geotech Eng 114(2):150–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz LE (2001) Mechanisms of soil stabilization with liquid ionic stabilizer. Transp Res Rec 1757:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadka SD (2017) Strength and shrink/swell behaviour of highly plastic clay treated with geopolymer. Transp Res Rec 2672:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha P, Chauhan AS, Swami S, Swami BL (2019) Investigating the effects of nanochemical-based ionic stabilizer and co-polymer on soil properties for pavement construction. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1635817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Xia C (2015) Experimental study of compaction effects and proportion of expansive soil improved by ionic soil stabilizer. In: International conference on advances in energy, environment and chemical engineering (AEECE)

  • Liu Q, Xiang W, Zhang W, Cui D (2009) Experimental study of ionic soil stabilizer-improves expansive soil. Rock Soil Mech 8:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry T (1997) Performance-based testing of chemical stabilizers. J Transp Res Board 1589:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch AF, Katz LE, Liljestrand HM (2003) An analysis of the mechanisms and efficacy of three liquild chemical soil stabilizers. Research report 1993-1. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, pp 1–204

  • Scholen DE (1992) Non-traditional stabilizers. Report FHWA-FLP-92-011

  • Scholen DE (1995) Stabilizer mechanisms in nonstandard stabilizers. In: Conference proceedings 6: sixth international conference on low-volume roads, vol 2, pp 252–260. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC

  • Sides G, Barden L (1970) The microstructure of dispersed and flocculated samples of kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Can Geotech J 8:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingle JS (1989) Stabilization mechanisms of non traditional additives. Transp Res Board 1989:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang WC (2010) Theory and practice of ionic soil stabilizer reinforcing special clay. J Earth Sci 21:882–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by TX ProChemical Inc. The authors are grateful to Mr. Scott Horn for assistance in the collection of the test soil samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinbao Yu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gautam, S., Hoyos, L.R., He, S. et al. Chemical Treatment of a Highly Expansive Clay Using a Liquid Ionic Soil Stabilizer. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 4981–4993 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01342-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01342-1

Keywords

Navigation