Skip to main content
Log in

Porosity/Cement Index Controlling Flexural Tensile Strength of Artificially Cemented Soils in Brazil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When the soil does not attain a target mechanical behaviour, modifying the project, removing and replacing the material or improving the soil is necessary. Adding Portland cement to soils and performing densification through compaction are effective approaches for ground improvement. Tensile strength is a mechanical property employed to evaluate the performance of cemented materials, and it can be assessed by flexural tensile strength tests and splitting tensile strength tests. The porosity/cement index has been shown to govern the splitting tensile strength of artificially cemented sands, but no attempt was made to find a relation between this ratio and flexural tensile strength. Hence, this study aims to quantify the influence of porosity, Portland cement content and the porosity/cement index on the flexural strength of three artificially cemented soils (sand, silt and silty sand). An experimental program of flexural and splitting tensile strength tests, as well as unconfined compression tests, was carried out to assess that influence on specimens with different porosities and cement contents. Results demonstrate that the porosity/cement index is an appropriate parameter to assess the flexural strength of the artificially cemented silty and sandy soils. The ratio between flexural tensile strength and splitting tensile strength was found to be 3.31, 4.59 and 5.19 for artificially cemented sand, silt and silty sand, respectively, being independent of porosity, cement content and porosity/cement index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Empirical scalar

a :

Empirical scalar

b :

Width of beam

C :

Cement content (expressed in relation to mass of soil)

C iv :

Volumetric cement content (expressed in relation to the total specimen volume)

D :

Empirical scalar

d :

Height of beam

D theoretical :

Theoretical scalar

E :

Empirical scalar

E theoretical :

Theoretical scalar

emax :

Maximum void ratio

emin :

Minimum void ratio

F :

Load

K 1 :

Empirical scalar

K 2 :

Empirical scalar

L :

Length of beam

q t(FTS) :

Flexural tensile strength

q t(STS) :

Splitting tensile strength

q u :

Unconfined compressive strength

R 2 :

Coefficient of determination

\(\gamma_{d}\) :

Dry unit weight

\(\gamma_{s}\) :

Unit weight of solids

\(\eta\) :

Porosity

\(\eta /C_{iv }\) :

Porosity/cement index

\(\eta /(C_{iv} )^{0.28}\) :

Adjusted porosity/cement index

References

  • ASTM (2010) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM (2011a) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM (2011b) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM (2012) Standard test method for flexural strength of soil-cement using simple beam with third-point loading. ASTM D1635, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

  • Carneiro FLB, Barcellos A (1953) Concrete tensile strength. Testing Research Laboratory Paris, France, Bulletin No. 13, pp 97–127

  • Chang TS, Woods RD (1992) Effect of particle contact bond on shear modulus. J Geotech Eng 118(8):1216–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough GW, Sitar N, Bachus RC, Rad NS (1981) Cemented sands under static loading. J Geotech Eng Div 107(6):799–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(2):197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Thomé A, Donato M, Graham KS (2008) Loading tests on compacted soil-bottom ash-carbide lime layers. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 161(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Viana da Fonseca A, Cruz RC, Heineck KS (2009a) Fundamental parameters for the stiffness and strength control of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(9):1347–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Dallarosa F, Fonini A (2009b) Plate load tests on cemented soil layers overlaying weaker soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1846–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Cruz RC, Floss MF, Festugato L (2010) Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(5):759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Viana da Fonseca A, Cruz RC, Silva SR (2011) Voids/cement ratio controlling tensile strength of cement treated soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(11):1126–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Viana da Fonseca A, Festugato L, Cruz RC, Fonini A (2012) Parameters controlling stiffness and strength of artificially cemented soils. Géotechnique 62(2):177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Lopes LS Jr, Consoli BS, Festugato L (2014) Mohr–Coulomb failure envelopes of lime treated soils. Géotechnique 64(2):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Quiñónez Samaniego RA, Kanazawa Villalba NM (2016a) Durability, strength and stiffness of dispersive clay-lime blends. J Mater Civ Eng 28(1):04016124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Ferreira PMV, Tang C-S, Marques SFV, Festugato L, Corte MB (2016b) A unique relationship determining strength of silty/clayey soils—Portland cement mixes. Soils Found 56(6):1082–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Faro VP, Schnaid F, Born RB, Carretta MS (2017a) Crosswise-loaded short and long piles in artificially cemented top sand layers embedded in lightly bonded residual soil. Soils Found 57(6):935–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Marques SFV, Floss MF, Festugato L (2017b) Broad-spectrum empirical correlation determining tensile and compressive strength of cement bonded clean granular soils. J Mater Civ Eng 29(6):06017004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Pasche E, Specht LP, Tanski M (2018) Key parameters controlling dynamic modulus of crushed reclaimed asphalt paving–powdered rock–Portland cement blends. Road Mater Pavement Des 19(8):1716–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diambra A, Ibraim E, Peccin A, Consoli NC, Festugato L (2017) Theoretical derivation of artificially cemented granular soil strength. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(5):04017003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diambra A, Festugato L, Peccin da Silva A, Consoli NC, Ibraim E (2018) Modelling tensile/compressive strength ratio of artificially cemented clean sands. Soils Found 58(1):199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faro VP, Consoli NC, Schnaid F, Thomé A, Lopes LS Jr (2015) Field tests on laterally loaded rigid piles in cemented treated soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(6):06015003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran KA, Anuradha R, Venkatasubramani GS (2015) Studies on relationship between compressive and splitting tensile strength of high performance concrete. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 10(14):6151–6156

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanendran CT, Paul DK (2016) Fatigue characterization of lightly cementitiously stabilized granular base materials using flexural testing. J Mater Civ Eng 28(9):4016086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (1981) Soil improvement—state-of-the-art report. In: Proceedings 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, pp 509–565

  • Paul DK, Gnanendran CT (2016) Characterization of lightly stabilized granular base materials using monotonic and cyclic load flexural testing. J Mater Civ Eng 28(1):04015074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter D (2018) Durability, strength and stiffness of green stabilized sand. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (in Portuguese)

  • Zhou FP, Balendran RV, Jeary AP (1998) Size effect on flexural, splitting tensile, and torsional strengths of high-strength concrete. Cem Concr Res 28(12):1725–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their appreciation to Edital 12/2014 FAPERGS/CNPq—PRONEX (Project # 16/2551-0000469-2), CNPq (INCT-REAGEO, Universal and Produtividade em Pesquisa) and PROEX-CAPES for funding the research group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilo Cesar Consoli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Consoli, N.C., da Silva, A., Barcelos, A.M. et al. Porosity/Cement Index Controlling Flexural Tensile Strength of Artificially Cemented Soils in Brazil. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 713–722 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01059-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01059-w

Keywords

Navigation