Abstract
When the soil does not attain a target mechanical behaviour, modifying the project, removing and replacing the material or improving the soil is necessary. Adding Portland cement to soils and performing densification through compaction are effective approaches for ground improvement. Tensile strength is a mechanical property employed to evaluate the performance of cemented materials, and it can be assessed by flexural tensile strength tests and splitting tensile strength tests. The porosity/cement index has been shown to govern the splitting tensile strength of artificially cemented sands, but no attempt was made to find a relation between this ratio and flexural tensile strength. Hence, this study aims to quantify the influence of porosity, Portland cement content and the porosity/cement index on the flexural strength of three artificially cemented soils (sand, silt and silty sand). An experimental program of flexural and splitting tensile strength tests, as well as unconfined compression tests, was carried out to assess that influence on specimens with different porosities and cement contents. Results demonstrate that the porosity/cement index is an appropriate parameter to assess the flexural strength of the artificially cemented silty and sandy soils. The ratio between flexural tensile strength and splitting tensile strength was found to be 3.31, 4.59 and 5.19 for artificially cemented sand, silt and silty sand, respectively, being independent of porosity, cement content and porosity/cement index.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Empirical scalar
- a :
-
Empirical scalar
- b :
-
Width of beam
- C :
-
Cement content (expressed in relation to mass of soil)
- C iv :
-
Volumetric cement content (expressed in relation to the total specimen volume)
- D :
-
Empirical scalar
- d :
-
Height of beam
- D theoretical :
-
Theoretical scalar
- E :
-
Empirical scalar
- E theoretical :
-
Theoretical scalar
- emax :
-
Maximum void ratio
- emin :
-
Minimum void ratio
- F :
-
Load
- K 1 :
-
Empirical scalar
- K 2 :
-
Empirical scalar
- L :
-
Length of beam
- q t(FTS) :
-
Flexural tensile strength
- q t(STS) :
-
Splitting tensile strength
- q u :
-
Unconfined compressive strength
- R 2 :
-
Coefficient of determination
- \(\gamma_{d}\) :
-
Dry unit weight
- \(\gamma_{s}\) :
-
Unit weight of solids
- \(\eta\) :
-
Porosity
- \(\eta /C_{iv }\) :
-
Porosity/cement index
- \(\eta /(C_{iv} )^{0.28}\) :
-
Adjusted porosity/cement index
References
ASTM (2010) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2011a) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2011b) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2012) Standard test method for flexural strength of soil-cement using simple beam with third-point loading. ASTM D1635, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
Carneiro FLB, Barcellos A (1953) Concrete tensile strength. Testing Research Laboratory Paris, France, Bulletin No. 13, pp 97–127
Chang TS, Woods RD (1992) Effect of particle contact bond on shear modulus. J Geotech Eng 118(8):1216–1233
Clough GW, Sitar N, Bachus RC, Rad NS (1981) Cemented sands under static loading. J Geotech Eng Div 107(6):799–817
Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(2):197–205
Consoli NC, Thomé A, Donato M, Graham KS (2008) Loading tests on compacted soil-bottom ash-carbide lime layers. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 161(1):29–38
Consoli NC, Viana da Fonseca A, Cruz RC, Heineck KS (2009a) Fundamental parameters for the stiffness and strength control of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(9):1347–1353
Consoli NC, Dallarosa F, Fonini A (2009b) Plate load tests on cemented soil layers overlaying weaker soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1846–1856
Consoli NC, Cruz RC, Floss MF, Festugato L (2010) Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(5):759–763
Consoli NC, Viana da Fonseca A, Cruz RC, Silva SR (2011) Voids/cement ratio controlling tensile strength of cement treated soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(11):1126–1131
Consoli NC, Viana da Fonseca A, Festugato L, Cruz RC, Fonini A (2012) Parameters controlling stiffness and strength of artificially cemented soils. Géotechnique 62(2):177–183
Consoli NC, Lopes LS Jr, Consoli BS, Festugato L (2014) Mohr–Coulomb failure envelopes of lime treated soils. Géotechnique 64(2):165–170
Consoli NC, Quiñónez Samaniego RA, Kanazawa Villalba NM (2016a) Durability, strength and stiffness of dispersive clay-lime blends. J Mater Civ Eng 28(1):04016124
Consoli NC, Ferreira PMV, Tang C-S, Marques SFV, Festugato L, Corte MB (2016b) A unique relationship determining strength of silty/clayey soils—Portland cement mixes. Soils Found 56(6):1082–1088
Consoli NC, Faro VP, Schnaid F, Born RB, Carretta MS (2017a) Crosswise-loaded short and long piles in artificially cemented top sand layers embedded in lightly bonded residual soil. Soils Found 57(6):935–946
Consoli NC, Marques SFV, Floss MF, Festugato L (2017b) Broad-spectrum empirical correlation determining tensile and compressive strength of cement bonded clean granular soils. J Mater Civ Eng 29(6):06017004
Consoli NC, Pasche E, Specht LP, Tanski M (2018) Key parameters controlling dynamic modulus of crushed reclaimed asphalt paving–powdered rock–Portland cement blends. Road Mater Pavement Des 19(8):1716–1733
Diambra A, Ibraim E, Peccin A, Consoli NC, Festugato L (2017) Theoretical derivation of artificially cemented granular soil strength. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(5):04017003
Diambra A, Festugato L, Peccin da Silva A, Consoli NC, Ibraim E (2018) Modelling tensile/compressive strength ratio of artificially cemented clean sands. Soils Found 58(1):199–211
Faro VP, Consoli NC, Schnaid F, Thomé A, Lopes LS Jr (2015) Field tests on laterally loaded rigid piles in cemented treated soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(6):06015003
Gajendran KA, Anuradha R, Venkatasubramani GS (2015) Studies on relationship between compressive and splitting tensile strength of high performance concrete. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 10(14):6151–6156
Gnanendran CT, Paul DK (2016) Fatigue characterization of lightly cementitiously stabilized granular base materials using flexural testing. J Mater Civ Eng 28(9):4016086
Mitchell JK (1981) Soil improvement—state-of-the-art report. In: Proceedings 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, pp 509–565
Paul DK, Gnanendran CT (2016) Characterization of lightly stabilized granular base materials using monotonic and cyclic load flexural testing. J Mater Civ Eng 28(1):04015074
Winter D (2018) Durability, strength and stiffness of green stabilized sand. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (in Portuguese)
Zhou FP, Balendran RV, Jeary AP (1998) Size effect on flexural, splitting tensile, and torsional strengths of high-strength concrete. Cem Concr Res 28(12):1725–1736
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Edital 12/2014 FAPERGS/CNPq—PRONEX (Project # 16/2551-0000469-2), CNPq (INCT-REAGEO, Universal and Produtividade em Pesquisa) and PROEX-CAPES for funding the research group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Consoli, N.C., da Silva, A., Barcelos, A.M. et al. Porosity/Cement Index Controlling Flexural Tensile Strength of Artificially Cemented Soils in Brazil. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 713–722 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01059-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01059-w