Advertisement

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 2245–2254 | Cite as

Reliability Analysis of Slope Safety Factor by Using GPR and GP

  • Pijush SamuiEmail author
  • Rahul Kumar
  • Uttam Yadav
  • Sunita Kumari
  • Dieu Tien Bui
Technical Note
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Reliability analysis of slope is an important aspect of geotechnical engineering practice. However, it is very difficult to assess the estimation of reliability analysis of slope because it include the uncertainty parameters i.e. soil parameters cohesion of soil (c), angle of shearing resistance (φ) and unit weight of soil (γ). In former days, to execute the reliability analysis of slope, several analytical methods were used but at the present days various computer technique (model) are available and among which Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Genetic Programming (GP) are part of them. This paper’s primary objective is to survey the fitness of GPR and GP with the help of First Oder Second Moment Method (FOSM) to find out the Reliability analysis of slope. The GP is the non-parametric kernel probabilistic method. It is adequately assigned by its mean function m(x) and covariance function k(x, x′). GP is a standard technique for acquiring computer automatically to resolve a problem from an eminent-level argument of what need to be performed. This study shows that the proposed GPR based FOSM is suitable alternative for reliability analysis of slope.

Keywords

Slope reliability FOSM GPR and GP 

References

  1. Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Methods.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00201-3 Google Scholar
  2. Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Géotechnique.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.1.7 Google Scholar
  3. Chowdhury RN, Xu DW (1994) Rational polynomial technique in slope-reliability analysis. J Geotech Eng 119:1910–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:12(1910) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornell CA (1969) A probability-based structural code. ACI J.  https://doi.org/10.14359/7446 Google Scholar
  5. Gavin K, Xue J (2009) Use of a genetic algorithm to perform reliability analysis of unsaturated soil slopes. Géotechnique 59:545–549.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.T.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giasi CI, Masi P, Cherubini C (2003) Probabilistic and fuzzy reliability analysis of a sample slope near Aliano. Eng Geol 67:391–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00222-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Univ Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.  https://doi.org/10.1137/1018105 Google Scholar
  8. Huang F-K, Wang GS (2007) ANN-based reliability analysis for deep excavation. In: Eurocorn2007—international conference on computer as a tool, pp 2039–2046.  https://doi.org/10.1109/eurcon.2007.4400328
  9. Hurtado JE, Alvarez DA (2001) Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:113–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00248-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jang JSR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685.  https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 63:425–464.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koza JR (1992) The Genetic Programming paradigm: genetically breeding populations of computer programs to solve problems. MIT Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.1990.130444 Google Scholar
  13. Mathur S, Samui P (2013) Application of relevance vector machine for structural reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in civil engineering AETACE, pp 961–967Google Scholar
  14. Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V, Lagaros ND (1996) Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 136:145–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(96)01011-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park D, Rilett LR (1999) Forecasting freeway link travel times with a multilayer feedforward neural network. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 14:357–367.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2004) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Rasmussen CE, Uk CA, Nickisch H, De HM (2010) Gaussian processes for machine learning (GPML) toolbox. J Mach Learn Res 11:3011–3015.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065704001899 Google Scholar
  18. Sengupta A, Upadhyay A (2009) Locating the critical failure surface in a slope stability analysis by genetic algorithm. Appl Soft Comput J 9:387–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi JQ, Wang B, Murray-Smith R, Titterington DM (2007) Gaussian process functional regression modeling for batch data. Biometrics 63:714–723.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00758.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy Identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 15:116–132.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pijush Samui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rahul Kumar
    • 1
  • Uttam Yadav
    • 1
  • Sunita Kumari
    • 1
  • Dieu Tien Bui
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute of Technology PatnaPatnaIndia
  2. 2.Geographic Information Science Research GroupTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Faculty of Environment and Labour SafetyTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations