Advertisement

Constrained Compression Models for Tire-Derived Aggregate-Sand Mixtures Using Enhanced Large Scale Oedometer Testing Apparatus

  • Reza Jamshidi Chenari
  • Reza Alaie
  • Behzad FatahiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Tire derived aggregates have recently been in wide use both in industry and engineering applications depending on the size and the application sought. Five different contents of tire derived aggregates (TDA) were mixed with sand thoroughly to ensure homogeneity. A series of large scale oedometer experiments were conducted to investigate the compressibility properties of the mixtures. Tire shreds content, TDA aspect ratio, skeletal relative density and overburden pressure are studied parameters. Constrained deformation modulus and coefficient of earth pressure at rest are measured parameters. All tests were conducted at seven overburden pressure levels. It was concluded that deformability of TDA-sand mixture increases with soft inclusion. Overburden pressure and skeletal relative density are also important parameters which render more rigidity and less lateral earth pressure coefficient accordingly. TDA size or aspect ratio was shown to have minor effect at least for the constrained strain conditions encountered in current study. An EPR-based parametric study and also sensitivity analyses based on cosine amplitude method revealed quantitative evaluation of the relative importance of each input parameter in varying deformation and lateral earth pressure coefficient as the outputs.

Keywords

TDA Constrained modulus Lateral earth pressure EPR model Oedometer Chamkhaleh sand 

Notes

References

  1. Ahmed I, Lovell CW (1993) Rubber soils as lightweight geomaterials. Transp Res Rec 1422:61–70Google Scholar
  2. Ahn IS, Cheng L (2017) Seismic analysis of semi-gravity RC cantilever retaining wall with TDA backfill. Front Struct Civ Eng J 11(4):455–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0392-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn IS, Cheng L, Fox PJ, Wright J, Patenaude S, Fujii B (2014) Material properties of large-size tire derived aggregate for civil engineering applications. Mater Civ Eng J 27(9):04014258.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allman MA, Simundic G (1998) Testing of a retaining wall constructed of waste tires. In: Proceeding of 3rd international congress on environmental geotechnics, vol 2, pp 655–660Google Scholar
  5. Anastasiadis A, Senetakis K, Pitilakis K (2012) Small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio of sand-rubber and gravel-rubber mixtures. Geotech Geol Eng J 30(2):363–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9473-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D3999/D3999M-11e1 (2011) Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. www.astm.org. Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  7. ASTM D6270-08 (2012) Standard practice for use of scrap tires in civil engineering applications, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. www.astm.org. Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  8. Bosscher PJ, Edil TB, Kuraoka S (1997) Design of highway embankments using tire chips. Geotech Geol Eng J 123(4):295–304.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(295) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Disfani MM, Tsang HH, Arulrajah A, Yaghoubi E (2017) Shear and compression characteristics of recycled glass-tire mixtures. Mater Civ Eng J 29(6):06017003.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drescher A, Newcomb D, Heimdahl T (1999) Deformability of shredded tires. Final report, 1996–1998 (No. PB-99-162588/XAB). Minnesota University, Department of Civil Engineering, Minneapolis, MN (United States); Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Research Services, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  11. Edil TB (2004) A review of mechanical and chemical properties of shredded tires and soil mixtures. In: Aydilek AH, Wartman J (eds) Recycled materials in geotechnics. American Society of Civil Engineers, GSP 127, ASCE Baltimore, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  12. Edil TB, Bosscher PJ (1994) Engineering properties of tire chips and soil mixtures. Geotech Test J 17(4):453–464.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10306J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edinçliler A, Baykal G, Dengili K (2004) Determination of static and dynamic behavior of recycled materials for highways. Resour Conserv Recycl J 42(3):223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El Naggar H, Soleimani P, Fakhroo A (2016) Strength and stiffness properties of green lightweight fill mixtures. Geotech Geol Eng J 34(3):867–876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0010-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eldin NN, Senouci AB (1993) Rubber-tire particles as concrete aggregate. Mater Civ Eng J 5(4):478–496.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1993)5:4(478) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans TM, Valdes JR (2011) The microstructure of particulate mixtures in one-dimensional compression: numerical studies. Granul Matter J 13(5):657–669.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-011-0278-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fathali M, Nejad FM, Esmaeili M (2016) Influence of tire-derived aggregates on the properties of railway ballast material. Mater Civ Eng J 29(1):04016177.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng ZY, Sutter KG (2000) Dynamic properties of granulated rubber and mixtures. Geotech Test J 23:338–344.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11055J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finney B, Chandler Z, Bruce J, Apple B (2013) Properties of tire derived aggregate for civil engineering applications. (CalRecycle) California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, Humbolt State University, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  20. Giustolisi O, Savic DA (2003) Evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR): development and applications, report 2003/01. School of Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, Centre for Water Systems, University of ExeterGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall TJ (1991) Reuse of shredded tire material for leachate collection systems. In: Humphrey DN, Manion (eds) Proceedings, 14th annual Madison waste conference. Department of Engineering Professional Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison, pp 367–376Google Scholar
  22. Heimdahl TC, Drescher A (1999) Elastic anisotropy of tire shreds. Geotech Geoenviron Eng J 125(5):383–389.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:5(383) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hudson AP, Beaven RP, Powrie W (2003) Bulk compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of used tyres for landfill drainage applications. In: Proceeding Sardinia 2003: 9th international waste management and landfill symposium, 6–10 October, SardinaGoogle Scholar
  24. Humphrey DN (2007) Tire derived aggregate as lightweight fill for embankments and retaining walls. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials-opportunities and challenges, IW-TDGM, pp 59–81Google Scholar
  25. Humphrey DN, Eaton RA (1995) Field performance of tire chips as subgrade insulation for rural roads. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on low-volume roads. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, pp 77–86Google Scholar
  26. Humphrey DN, Manion WP (1992) Properties of tire chips for lightweight fill. Grouting Soil Improv Geosynth 30(2):1344–1355Google Scholar
  27. Humphrey DN, Nickels WL (1997) Effect of tire chips as lightweight fill on pavement performance. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, New Delhi, pp 1617–1620Google Scholar
  28. Humphrey DN, Sandford TC (1993) Tire chips as lightweight subgrade fill and retaining wall backfill. Symposium on recovery and effective reuse of discarded material and by-products for construction of highway facilities. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Humphrey DN, Sandford TC, Cribbs MM, Gharegrat H, Manion WP (1992) Tire shreds as lightweight backfill for retaining walls-phase I. A study for the new England transportation consortium. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maine, OronoGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphrey DN, Sandford TC, Cribbs MM, Manion WP (1993) Shear strength and compressibility of tire chips for use as retaining wall backfill. In: Lightweight artificial and waste materials for embankments over soft soils. Transportation research record 1422. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 29–35Google Scholar
  31. Jamshidi Chenari R, Fard MK, Maghfarati SP, Pishgar F, Machado SL (2016) An investigation on the geotechnical properties of sand-EPS mixture using large oedometer apparatus. Constr Build Mater J 113:773–782.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jamshidi Chenari R, Fatahi B, Akhavan Maroufi MA, Alaie R (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation on compressibility and settlement behavior of sand mixed with tire shreds. Geotechn Geol Eng J 35:2401–2420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0255-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim HK, Santamarina JC (2008) Sand-rubber mixtures (large rubber chips). Can Geotech J 45(10):1457–1466.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lambe TW, Whitman RV (2008) Soil mechanics SI version. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  35. Lassiter A (2009) Septic system trench TDA-A national overview. New York State TDA Workshop, Center for Integrated Waste Management, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  36. Laucelli D, Berardi L, Dogliono A (2005) Evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) toolbox. Technical University Bari, BariGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawrence B, Humphrey D, Chen LH (1999) Field trial of tire shreds as insulation for paved roads. In: Cold regions engineering: putting research into practice. ASCE, pp 428–439Google Scholar
  38. Meles D, Bayat A, Soleymani H (2012) Compression behavior of large-sized tire-derived aggregate for embankment application. Mater Civ Eng J 25(9):1285–1290.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meles D, Bayat A, Chan D (2014) One-dimensional compression model for tire-derived aggregate using large-scale testing apparatus. Int J Geotech Eng 8(2):197–204.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1939787913Y.0000000019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meles D, Chan D, Yi Y, Bayat A (2015) Finite-element analysis of highway embankment made from tire-derived aggregate. Mater Civ Eng J 28(2):04015100.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mills B, McGinn J (2010) Design, construction, and performance of a highway embankment failure repaired with tire-derived aggregate. Transp Res Rec Transp Res Board J 2170:90–99.  https://doi.org/10.3141/2170-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monjezi M, Bahrami A, Varjani AY, Sayadi AR (2011) Prediction and controlling of flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci 4(3–4):421–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0091-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Monjezi M, Khoshalan HA, Varjani AY (2012) Prediction of flyrock and back break in open pit blasting operation: a neuro-genetic approach. Arab J Geosci 5(3):441–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0185-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moo-Young H, Sellasie K, Zeroka D, Sabnis G (2003) Physical and chemical properties of recycled tire shreds for use in construction. Environ Eng J 129(10):921–929.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:10(921) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neaz Sheikh M, Mashiri MS, Vinod JS, Tsang HH (2012) Shear and compressibility behavior of sand-tire crumb mixtures. Mater Civ Eng J 25(10):1366–1374.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newcomb DE, Drescher A (1994) Engineering properties of shredded tires in lightweight fill applications. Transportation research record 1437. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  47. Park JK, Edil TB, Kim JY, Huh M, Lee SH, Lee JJ (2003) Suitability of shredded tyres as a substitute for a landfill leachate collection medium. Waste Manag Res J 21(3):278–289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0302100311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perez JL, Kwok CY, Senetakis K (2016) Effect of rubber size on the behavior of sand-rubber mixtures: a numerical investigation. Comput Geotech J 80:199–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rao GV, Dutta RK (2006) Compressibility and strength behaviour of sand-tyre chip mixtures. Geotech Geol Eng J 24(3):711–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-004-4006-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reddy SB, Krishna AM (2017) Sand-tire chip mixtures for sustainable geoengineering applications. In: Sivakumar Babu G, Saride S, Basha B (eds) Sustainability issues in civil engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 223–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1930-2-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reddy KR, Saichek RE (1998) Characterization and performance assessment of shredded scrap tires as leachate drainage material in landfills. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, pp 407–416Google Scholar
  52. Rezania M, Faramarzi A, Javadi AA (2011) An evolutionary based approach for assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and lateral displacement. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(1):142–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rowe RK, McIsaac R (2005) Clogging of tire shreds and gravel permeated with landfill leachate. Geotech Geoenviron Eng J 131(6):682–693.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:6(682) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2012) Dynamic properties of dry sand/rubber (SRM) and gravel/rubber (GRM) mixtures in a wide range of shearing strain amplitudes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng J 33(1):38–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shahin MA, Maier HR, Jaksa MB (2004) Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering. Comput Civ Eng J 18(2):105–114.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:2(105) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shalaby A, Khan RA (2005) Design of unsurfaced roads constructed with large-size shredded rubber tires: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl J 44(4):318–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strenk PM, Wartman J, Grubb DG, Humphrey DN, Natale MF (2007) Variability and scale-dependency of tire-derived aggregate. Mater Civ Eng J 19(3):233–241.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:3(233) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tandon V, Velazco DA, Nazarian S, Picornell M (2007) Performance monitoring of embankments containing tire chips: case study. Perform Constr Facil J 21(3):207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:3(207) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tatlisoz N, Benson CH, Edil TB (1997) Effect of fines on mechanical properties of soil-tire chip mixtures. In: Wasemiller MA, Hoddinott KB (eds) Testing soil mixed with waste or recycled materials. ASTM International, ASTM STP 1275, pp 93–108Google Scholar
  60. Tatlisoz N, Edil TB, Benson CH (1998) Interaction between reinforcing geosynthetics and soil-tire chip mixtures. Geotech Geoenviron Eng J 124(11):1109–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1109) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tweedie J, Humphrey D, Sandford T (1998) Full-scale field trials of tire shreds as lightweight retaining wall backfill under at-rest conditions. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1619:64–71.  https://doi.org/10.3141/1619-08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Warith MA, Rao SM (2006) Predicting the compressibility behaviour of tire shred samples for landfill applications. Waste Manag J 26(3):268–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wartman J, Natale MF, Strenk PM (2007) Immediate and time-dependent compression of tire derived aggregate. Geotech Geoenviron Eng J 133(3):245–256.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:3(245) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolfe SL, Humphrey DN, Wetzel EA (2004) Development of tire shred underlayment to reduce groundborne vibration from LRT track. In: Geotechnical engineering for transportation projects, pp 750–759Google Scholar
  65. Yang Y, Zhang Q (1997) Analysis for the results of point load testing with artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of computer methods and advances in geomechanics, IACMAG, pp 607–612.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-009-0157-y
  66. Yang S, Lohnes RA, Kjartanson BH (2002) Mechanical properties of shredded tires. Geotech Test J 25(1):44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11078J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yi Y, Meles D, Nassiri S, Bayat A (2014) On the compressibility of tire-derived aggregate: comparison of results from laboratory and field tests. Can Geotech J 52(4):442–458.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yoon S, Prezzi M, Siddiki NZ, Kim B (2006) Construction of a test embankment using a sand-tire shred mixture as fill material. Waste Manag J 26(9):1033–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Youwai S, Bergado DT (2003) Strength and deformation characteristics of shredded rubber tire - sandmixtures. Canad Geotech J 40(2):254–264.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zimmerman PS (1997) Compressibility, hydraulic conductivity, and soil infiltration testing of tire shreds and field testing of a shredded tire horizontal drain. M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, AmesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Jamshidi Chenari
    • 1
  • Reza Alaie
    • 1
  • Behzad Fatahi
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringThe University of GuilanRashtIran
  2. 2.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations