Skip to main content
Log in

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Fuzzy Logic System and Its Influences on Mainlines in Lashgarak Region, Tehran, Iran

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility mapping is among the useful tools applied in disaster management and planning development activities in mountainous areas. The susceptibility maps prepared in this research provide valuable information for landslide hazard management in Lashgarak region of Tehran. This study was conducted to, first, prepare landslide susceptibility maps for Lashgarak region and evaluate landslide effect on mainlines and, second, to analyze the main factors affecting landslide hazard increase in the study area in order to propose efficient strategies for landslide hazard mitigation. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis model (fuzzy logic) is used in the present work for scientific evaluation of landslide susceptible areas in Lashgarak region. To this end, ArcGIS, PCIGeomatica, and IDIRISI software packages were used. Eight information layers were selected for information analysis: ground strength class, slope angle, terrain roughness, normalized difference moisture index, normalized difference vegetation index, distance from fault, distance from the river, and distance from the road. Next, eight different scenarios were created to determine landslide susceptibility of the study area using different operators (intersection (AND), union (OR), algebraic sum (SUM), multiplication (PRODUCT), and different fuzzy gamma values) of fuzzy overlay approach. After that, the performance of various fuzzy operators in landslide susceptibility mapping was empirically compared. The results revealed the excellent consistency of landslide susceptibility map prepared using the fuzzy union (OR) operator with landslide distribution map in the study area. Eventually, the accuracy of landslide susceptibility map prepared using the fuzzy union (OR) operator was evaluated using the frequency ratio diagram. The results showed that frequency values of the landslides gradually increase from “low susceptibility” to high “susceptibility” as 88.34% of the landslides are categorized into two “high” and “very high” susceptibility classes, implying the satisfactory consistency between the landslide susceptibility map prepared using fuzzy union (OR) operator and landslide distribution map.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed B (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping using multi-criteria evaluation techniques in Chittagong Metropolitan Area, Bangladesh. Landslides, 1–19

  • Ahmed B, Ahmed R, Zhu X (2013) Evaluation of model validation techniques in land cover dynamics. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 2(3):577–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The Application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahoko Mountains, central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banshtu RS, and Prakash C (2014) Application of remote sensing and GIS techniques in landslide hazard zonation of Hilly Terrain. In: Landslide Science for a Safer Geo environment. Springer international publishing, pp 313–317

  • Brand EW (1984) Landslides in Southeast Asia: a state-of-the-art report. In: proceedings of 4th international symposium on landslides, Toronto, Canadian geotechnical society 1, pp 17–59

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput Geosci 45:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden D, Varnes D (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner A, Schuster R (eds) Landslides: investigations and mitigation. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvish Zadeh A (1991) Geology of Iran. Danesh e Emrooz Press (associated with Amir Kabir press institution). Tehran, p 908 (in Persian)

  • Deering DW, Rouse JW, Haas RH, and Schell JA (1975) Measuring forage production of grazing using from Landsat MSS data. In: proceedings of 10th international symposium on remote sensing of environment, Ann Arbor: ERIM 2, pp 1169–1178

  • Eastman JR (1997) Idrisi for windows user’s guide version 2.0 clark labs for cartographic technology and geographic analysis. Clark University, Worcester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi Gh (2015) Landslide hazard zonation in the south of Ardebil (the 5th segment of the Ardebil-Mianeh railroad). M.Sc. Thesis, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran, p 149 (in Persian)

  • Fatemi Aghda SM, and Bagheri V (2014) Evaluation of earthquake-induced landslides hazard zonation methods: a case study of Sarein, Iran, earthquake (1997). Arabian J Geosci, 1–21

  • Fatemi Aghda SM, Giamian J, Eshgheli Farahani A (2006) Investigation landslide hazard using Fuzzy logic (case study: Roudbar area). Sci Tehran Univ J 31:43–64 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Florina CR (2013) Climatic dysfunctionalities observed with the aid of NDMI and SAVI indices in the LEU-ROTUNDA and DĂBULENI plains. Acad J Air Water Compon Environ/Aerul si Apa Compone, 500–507

  • Hafezi Moghadas N, Ghafouri M (2009) Environmental geology. Shahrood University of Technology Press, Shahrood, p 273 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • He X, Hong Y, Yu X, Cerato AB, Zhang X, and Komac M (2014) Landslides susceptibility mapping in Oklahoma State using GIS-based weighted linear combination method. In: Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment. Springer International Publishing, 371–377

  • Jibson RW, Harp EL, and Michael JA (1998) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps: an example from the Los Angles, California, Area. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 1998 (113), p 17

  • Keefer DK (1993) The susceptibility of rock slopes to earthquakeinduced failure. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 30(3):353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (2000) Statistical analysis of an earthquake-induced landslide distribution—the 1989 Loma Prieta. California event. Engineering geology 58(3):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouraki Nezhad M, Oonagh M, Sepehri A (2002) A comparison between two landslide zoning models (Haeri and Mora) in Siah Watershed, Roudbar, Gorgan. Quarterly of Agriculturing and Natural Resources. 12(3):91–99 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2007) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 50:847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2002) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavifar MR (2006) Analytical evaluation and design of the system (GIS) for seismic landslides hazard management in Iran. Ph.D thesis, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering And Seismology, Tehran, Iran, p 213 (in Persian)

  • Miles SB, and Keefer DK (2007) Comprehensive areal model of earthquake-induced landslides: technical specification and user guide. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007 (1072), p 69

  • Miles SB, Keefer DK (2009) Evaluation of CAMEL - Comprehensive areal model of earthquake-induced landslides. Eng Geol 104(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi HR, Pour Ghasemi HR, Mohammadi M, Mahdavifar MR (2010) Landslide hazard zonation using Fuzzy Gamma operator (case study: Haraz watershed). Environ Sci J 7(4):129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Motavali S, Esmaeeli R (2013) Landslide hazard zonation using Fuzzy Gamma operator (case study: Taleghan watershed). Environ Eros Res J 2(8):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan R, Roy A, Kumar RV, Mukherjee A, Khire MV (2000) Landslide hazard susceptibility mapping based on terrain and climatic factors for tropical monsoon regions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58(4):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourifard N (2009) Landslide Hazard Zonation Using Fuzzy sets In: Fasham Area. M.Sc. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran, p 195 (in Persian)

  • Orn-uma P, and Bulgan D (2010) Mapping soil moisture in Darkhan’s agricultural land, Mongolia. In: 5th Annual International Workshop and Expo on Sumatra Tsunami Disaster and Recovery, 250–254

  • Orn-uma P, and Lal S (2009) Retrieval of soil moisture index from MODIS in dry land areas. Joint training workshop, AWCI‐ICG 15–17, Tokyo, p 60

  • Pachauri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide Hazard Mapping Based On Geological Attributes. Eng Geol 32:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pour Ghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012a) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin Iran. Catena 97:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pour Ghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012b) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed Iran. Nat Hazards 63(2):965–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pour Ghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Moezzi KD (2013) A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomat, Nat Hazards Risk 4(2):93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pour Ghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Fatemi Aghda SM (2014) Prioritization of factors effective on landslide occurrence and susceptibility zoning using the Shannon entropy index. J Sci Technol Agric Nat Resour; Soil Water Sci 18(70):181–192 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland Malaysia. Landslides 7(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin S, Jiao JJ, Wang S (2002) A nonlinear dynamical model of landslide evolution. Geomorphology 43(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi AM (2010) Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake-Induced Landslides Hazard in Iran. Ph.D Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, p 238 (in Persian)

  • Sakar S, Kanungo D, Mehrotar GS (1995) Landslide hazard zonation: a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Mt Res Dev 15:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salimi N (2014) Landslide Zonation Using Artificial Neural Networks (case study: Taleghan Aquiferous basin). M.Sc. Thesis, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran, p 170 (in Persian)

  • Zhou CH, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2002) On the spatial relationship between landslide and causative factors on Lantua island. Hong Kong. Geomorphol 43(3):197–207

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Fatemi Aghda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatemi Aghda, S.M., Bagheri, V. & Razifard, M. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Fuzzy Logic System and Its Influences on Mainlines in Lashgarak Region, Tehran, Iran. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 915–937 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0365-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0365-y

Keywords

Navigation