Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Affecting the Behaviour of Retaining Structures with Prestressed Anchorages Under 2D and 3D Conditions

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some basic factors which influence the behaviour of the anchored retaining structures are investigated and 2D analyses with three dimensional ones are compared. The parametric analysis under 2D conditions focuses on the influence of significant factors such as the normalized embedded depth of the wall, the resistance of the anchors, the free tendon length, the earth pressure coefficient at rest and the flexibility of the system, on the behaviour of the retaining structure. The analyses are performed in two groups for two representative soil types named S1 (weathered weak rock) and S2 (very stiff clay). Qualitative as well as quantitative conclusions are derived from the analyses concerning the influence of the above mentioned factors, mainly on the safety factor as well as on the displacements. The 3D analyses are carried out for various ratios L/H, where L is the length and H the height of the slope. Several trends are confirmed from the results concerning the influence of the above-mentioned factors. It is concluded that the triaxal conditions strongly affect the safety factor, as well as the distribution of horizontal and vertical displacements, mainly in the cases where the ratios L/H ≤ 2. Some serious deviations between 2D and 3D analyses are pointed out and the physical explanation of these differences is given for several cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B:

Width of the excavation

c:

Cohesion of the soil

D:

Embedded depth of the retaining piles

E:

Modulus of elasticity of the soil

FEM:

Finite element method

H:

Height of the slope

K:

Earth pressure coefficient at rest

L:

Length of the excavation

Lfree :

Free length of the anchors

Lfixed :

Fixed length of the anchors

Pi :

Prestress force of the anchor (lock-off load)

Rint :

Strength reduction factor at the interface

Ra,d :

Design resistance of the anchorages

SF:

Global safety factor

s:

Axial distance of the piles

sv :

Vertical distance of the anchors

SSR:

Shear strength reduction

ux, uy, uz :

Displacements in the direction x, y, z

β:

Inclination angle of the anchors

γ:

Bulk density of the soil

ν:

Poisson’s ratio

φ:

Angle of internal friction

References

  • Bakker KJ (2006) Α 3D FE model for excavation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium T.C28 (Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground), Netherlands, pp 473–478

  • Brinkgreve RBJ, Bakker HL (1991) Non-linear finite element analysis of safety factors. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer methods and advances in geomechanics, Cairns, Australia., 1117-1122

  • Clough GW, O’ Rourkee T-D (1990) Construction induced movements of in situ walls. Geotechnical Special Publication, No 25: Design and performance of earth retaining structures, June 1990, pp 439–470

  • Clough GW, Smith EM, Sweeney BP (1989) Movement control of excavation support systems by iterative design. In: Proceedings of the ASCE foundation engineering: current principles and practices, vol 2, pp 869–884

  • Hovland HJ (1977) Three-dimensional slope stability analysis method. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 103(9):971–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-C, Tsai C-C (2000) New method for 3D and asymmetrical slope stability analysis. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 126(10):917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshchinsky D, Huang C-C (1992) Generalized three-dimensional slope-stability analysis. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 118(11):1748–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski RL (2010) Limit analysis and stability charts for 3D slope failures. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 136(4):583–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou CY, Hsieh PO, Chien DC (1993) Characteristics of ground settlement during excavation. Can Geotech J 30(5):758–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou K (2011) Parametric analyses of retaining structures by prestressed anchors. Postgraduate thesis in N.T.U.A (in greek)

  • Plaxis Validation and Verification (2012) Phi-c reduction and comparison with Bishop’s method. Kb Plaxis nl, Knowledge Base

  • Poulos HG, Carter JP, Small JC (2001) Foundations and retaining structures—research and practice. General Report, proceedings of the 15th JCSMGE, Istanbul, vol 4, pp 2527–2606

  • Schweiger HF (1998) Results from two geotechnical benchmark problems. In: Cividini A (ed) Proceedings of the 4th European conference on numerical methods in geotechnical engineering, pp 645–654

  • Schweiger HF (2000): Ergebnisse des Berechnungsbeispieles Nr. 3 “3-fach verankerte Baugrube”. Tagungsband Workshop “Verformungsprognose fϋr tiefe Baugruben”, D.G.G.T./AK 1.6:7–67 (in German)

  • Yamagami T, Jiang JC (1997) A search for the critical slip surface in three-dimensional slope stability analysis. Soils Found Tokyo 37(3):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdrackovic L, Potts DM, St. John HD (2005) Modelling of a 3D excavation in finite element analysis. Geotechnique 55(7):497–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantina Papadopoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadopoulou, K., Sofianos, A. Factors Affecting the Behaviour of Retaining Structures with Prestressed Anchorages Under 2D and 3D Conditions. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1877–1887 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-9997-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-9997-6

Keywords

Navigation