Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blasting is important and an essential prerequisite in any opencast mine for fragmenting hard deposits. Blasting always produces unwanted effects like ground vibrations, noise and fly rock; among which ground vibrations effect is more on surrounding structures. Propagation of ground vibrations can lead to destruction of surrounding structures. Prediction of ground vibrations especially in terms of peak particle velocity is beneficial as opposed to conventional data monitoring techniques which can be expensive as well as time consuming. This paper uses predictors to estimate the intensity of ground vibrations and compares different methods of prediction methods like linear regression, multiple linear regression, non linear regression (NLR) and artificial neural networks. Intensity of ground vibrations generated from blasting operations was monitored in three different mines of limestone, dolomite and coal; obtaining about 168 ground vibration recordings in total. The statistical modelling or data-driven modeling has shown promise in the prediction of blast vibrations. Proposed a system of introducing site specific rock parameters like poison’s ratio, uniaxial compressive strength of rock and Young’s modulus to improve the correlation coefficient using statistical modelling (commonly called feature engineering in machine learning circles).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dowding CH (1985) Blast vibration monitoring and control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2001) The elements of statistical learning, vol 1. Springer, Berlin

  • Hegde C, Wallace S, Gray K (2015) Using trees, bagging, and random forests to predict rate of penetration during drilling. In: SPE middle east intelligent oil and gas conference and exhibition, Society of petroleum engineers. doi:10.2118/176792-MS

  • Hino K (1996) Fragmentation of rock through blasting. J Ind Explos Soc 17(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinzen KG (1988) Modelling of blast vibrations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 25(6):439–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2014) An Introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2006) Prediction of blast induced ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mine: a neural network approach. J Sound Vib 289(4):711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2007) Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(2):116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram Chandar K, Sastry VR, Hegde Chiranth, Sreedharan Sreesharan (2016) Prediction of peak particle velocity using multi regression analysis: case studies. Geomech Geoeng, Jl

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry VR, Ram Chandar K (2004) Shocktube initiation for better fragmentation: a case study. Fragblast 8(4):207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry VR, Ram Chandar K (2008) Assessment of blast performance based on energy distribution. In: Proceedings of 42nd American rock mechanics association conference, San Francisco, 29th June–2nd July 2008

  • Sastry VR, Teggi V, Ram Chandar K (2003) Shocktube initiation for eco-friendly blasting: a few case-studies. IE (I) J MN 83(1):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson PK (1990) Artificial neural systems: foundations, paradigms, applications, and implementations. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskind DE (1980) Structure response and damage produced by ground vibration from surface mine blasting. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested methods prepared by the ISRM Commission on Testing Methods. International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon

  • Widrow B, Lehr MA (1990) 30 years of adaptive neural networks: perceptron, madaline, and backpropagation. Proc IEEE 78(9):1415–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the management of different mines for permitting to carry out the field investigations and also for their cooperation during the studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ram Chandar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ram Chandar, K., Sastry, V.R. & Hegde, C. A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations. Geotech Geol Eng 35, 573–583 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0126-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0126-3

Keywords

Navigation