Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 365–376 | Cite as

Risk Assessment and Estimation of TBM Penetration Rate Using RES-Based Model

Original Paper

Abstract

The tunnel boring machine (TBM) penetration rate (PR) estimation is one of the crucial and complex tasks encountered frequently to excavate the mechanical tunnels. Predicting the PR is a nonlinear and multivariable complex problem and establishing relationship between rock properties and PR is not a simple task. To overcome this problem, in this paper, based on the basic concepts of a rock engineering systems (RES) approach, a model for the estimation of the PR and the risk associated is presented. The suggested model involves 6 effective parameters on PR (uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), ratio of the maximum load (PSI), average distance between planes of weakness (DPW), angle between tunnel axis and the planes of weakness (Alpha), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and rock fracture class (RFC)), while retaining simplicity as well. The performance of the RES model is compared with multiple regression models. The estimation abilities offered using RES and multiple regression models were presented by using field data given in open source literatures. The results indicate that the RES based model predictor with less mean square error (MSE) and higher coefficient of determination (R2) performs better than the other models (used in this study).

Keywords

TBM Rock properties Penetration rate Rock engineering systems Multiple regression models 

References

  1. Acaroglu O, Ozdemir L, Asbury B (2008) A fuzzy logic model to predict specific energy requirement for TBM performance prediction. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 23:600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahri Najafi A, Saeedi GR, Ebrahimi Farsangi MA (2014) Risk analysis and prediction of out-of-seam dilution in longwall mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:115–122Google Scholar
  3. Barton N (1999) TBM performance estimation in rock using QTBM. Tunn Tunn Int 31:41–48Google Scholar
  4. Barton NR (2000) TBM tunnelling in jointed and faulted rock. CRC Press, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Benardos A, Kaliampakos D (2004) A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling—illustrated by the Athens Metro, Greece. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:987–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruland A (1998) Hard rock tunnel boring. Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  7. Cancelli A, Crosta G (1993) Hazard and risk assessment in rockfall prone areas risk and reliability in ground engineering. Thomas Telford, London, pp 177–190Google Scholar
  8. Faramarzi F, Farsangi ME, Mansouri H (2013a) An RES-based model for risk assessment and prediction of backbreak in bench blasting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:877–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faramarzi F, Mansouri H, Ebrahimi Farsangi M (2013b) A rock engineering systems based model to predict rock fragmentation by blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:82–94Google Scholar
  10. Faramarzi F, Mansouri H, Farsangi MAE (2014) Development of rock engineering systems-based models for flyrock risk analysis and prediction of flyrock distance in surface blasting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1291–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farmer I, Glossop N (1980) Mechanics of disc cutter penetration. Tunn Tunn 12:22–25Google Scholar
  12. Graham P (1976) Rock exploration for machine manufacturers Exploration for rock engineering 173–180Google Scholar
  13. Grima MA, Bruines P, Verhoef P (2000) Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 15:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howarth D, Adamson W, Berndt J (1986) Correlation of model tunnel boring and drilling machine performances with rock properties. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 23:171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudson JA (1992) Rock engineering systems: theory and practice. Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes H (1986) The relative cuttability of coal-measures stone. Min Sci Technol 3:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jammalamadaka SR (2003) Introduction to linear regression analysis. Am Stat 57:67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu P, Latham J (1994) A continuous quantitative coding approach to the interaction matrix in rock engineering systems based on grey systems approaches. In: Proceedings of 7th international congress of the IAEG, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 4761–4770Google Scholar
  19. Mazzoccola D, Hudson J (1996) A comprehensive method of rock mass characterization for indicating natural slope instability. Q J Eng Geol 29:37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McFeat-Smith I (1977) Rock property testing for the assessment of tunnelling machine performance. Tunn Tunneling Int 9:29–33Google Scholar
  21. Moradi MR, Farsangi MAE (2014) Application of the risk matrix method for geotechnical risk analysis and prediction of the advance rate in rock TBM tunneling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1951–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson PP, Al-Jalil YA, Laughton C (1999) Improved strategies for TBM performance prediction and project management. In: Proceedings of the rapid excavation and tunneling conference, pp 963–980Google Scholar
  23. Ozdemir L (2007) Development of theoretical equations for predicting tunnel boreability. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Pang S, Goldsmith W, Hood M (1989) A force-indentation model for brittle rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 22:127–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ping L, Hudson J (1993) A fuzzy evaluation approach to the stability of underground excavations. In: ISRM international symposium-EUROCK 93. International society for rock mechanicsGoogle Scholar
  26. Ribacchi R, Fazio AL (2005) Influence of rock mass parameters on the performance of a TBM in a gneissic formation (Varzo Tunnel). Rock Mech Rock Eng 38:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roxborough FF, Phillips HR (1975) Rock excavation by disc cutter. In: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences and geomechanics abstracts, Elsevier, vol 12, pp 361–366Google Scholar
  28. Saffari A, Ataei M, Ghanbari K (2013) Applying rock engineering systems (RES) approach to evaluate and classify the coal spontaneous combustion potential in eastern alborz coal mines. Int J Min Geo Eng 47:115–127Google Scholar
  29. Sapigni M, Berti M, Bethaz E, Busillo A, Cardone G (2002) TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:771–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shin H-S, Kwon Y-C, Jung Y-S, Bae G-J, Kim Y-G (2009) Methodology for quantitative hazard assessment for tunnel collapses based on case histories in Korea. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1072–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Torabi S, Shirazi H, Hajali H, Monjezi M (2013) Study of the influence of geotechnical parameters on the TBM performance in Tehran-Shomal highway project using ANN and SPSS. Arab J Geosci 6:1215–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yagiz S (2002) Development of rock fracture and brittleness indices to quantify the effects of rock mass features and toughness in the CSM model basic penetration for hard rock tunneling machines. PhD thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, ColoGoogle Scholar
  33. Yagiz S (2008) Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 23:326–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yagiz S (2009) Assessment of brittleness using rock strength and density with punch penetration test. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 24:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yagiz S, Karahan H (2011) Prediction of hard rock TBM penetration rate using particle swarm optimization. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yagiz S, Ozdemir L (2011) Geotechnical parameters influencing the TBM performance in various rocks. In: Program with abstracts. 44th annual meeting of association of engineering geologists. Technical session, 2001Google Scholar
  37. Zhao Z, Gong Q, Zhang Y, Zhao J (2007) Prediction model of tunnel boring machine performance by ensemble neural networks. GeoMech GeoEng Int J 2:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringArak University of TechnologyArakIran

Personalised recommendations