Advertisement

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 303–311 | Cite as

Experimental Research on Mechanical Property of Phyllite Tunnel Surrounding Rock Under Different Moisture State

  • Kaifeng Hu
  • Qian Feng
  • Xutao Wang
Original paper

Abstract

Based on the Tian Cheng tunnel engineering project, the phyllite are collected to analyze the cementation type and internal structure by powder X-ray diffraction and electron microscope through INSTRON-1346 electrohydraulic servo tester. In addition, physical properties test, uniaxial compression test and triaxial compression test under different moisture state to analyzes the mechanical property of phyllite. The results indicate: Poisson ratio of phyllite fluctuates from 0.15 to 0.25 when structural plane’s dip angles fluctuate. There are fewer connections between poisson ratio and the included angle between the structural surface and loading direction. The failure mode of phyllite under dry state are: shear failure and bedding slide occurs under uniaxial pressure; when the dip angle of structural surface is perpendicular to the axial force, under different confining pressure, main failure mode of samples is shear failure. When the confining pressure is 10 MPa, poisson ratio of sample increases and compressive strength and elastic modulus decline when the soaked time increases. The plastic yield behavior occurs before the peak stress and strain and strain softening occurs over the peak. The plastic yield degree and softening degree increase with the increase of the soak time.

Keywords

Tunnel Phyllite Moisture content Laboratory test Mechanical property Water–rock coupling 

References

  1. Bell JR, Burton D, Thompson M et al (2014) Wind tunnel analysis of the slipstream and wake of a high-speed train. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 134:122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bråtveit K, Bruland A, Brevik O (2016) Rock falls in selected Norwegian hydropower tunnels subjected to hydropeaking. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 52:202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridgland DR, Harding P, Allen P et al (2013) An enhanced record of MIS 9 environments, geochronology and geoarchaeology: data from construction of the High Speed 1 (London–Channel Tunnel) rail-link and other recent investigations at Purfleet, Essex, UK. Proc Geol Assoc 124(3):417–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connolly DP, Kouroussis G, Woodward PK et al (2014) Scoping prediction of re-radiated ground-borne noise and vibration near high speed rail lines with variable soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyke CG, Dobereiner L (1991) Evaluating the strength and deformability of sandstones. Q J Eng Geol 24(1):123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hadizadeh J (1991) Water-weakening of sandstone and quartzite deformed at various stress and strain rates. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 28(5):431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heggheim T, Madland MV, Risnes R et al (2004) A chemicalinduced enhanced weakening of chalk by seawater. J Petrol Sci Eng 46(3):171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hellevang H, Pham VTH, Aagaard P (2013) Kinetic modelling of CO2-water-rock interactions. Int J Greenh Gas Control 15:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Homand F, Morel E, Henry JP et al (1993) Characterization of the module of elasticity of an anisotropic rock using dynamic and static methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(5):527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawata T, Nakano Y, Matsumoto T, et al (2014) The Relationship between TBM Data and Rockburst in Long-Distance Tunnel, Pahang-Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel, Malaysia. In: ISRM international symposium-8th Asian rock mechanics symposium. International Society for Rock MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu CW, Lu SL (2000) Research on mechanism of mudstone degradation and softening in water. Rock Soil Mech 21(1):28–31Google Scholar
  12. Lu Z, Yao HL, Liu J, et al (2015) Study on the rheological properties of the surrounding rock of a deep buried phyllite tunnel. In: 49th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics AssociationGoogle Scholar
  13. Nilsen B (2014) Characteristics of water ingress in Norwegian subsea tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(3):933–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tao G, King MS (1990) Shear-wave velocity and Q anisotropy in rocks: a laboratory study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27(5):353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Early WarningInstitute of Seismology, CEAWuhanChina
  2. 2.Wuhan Institute of Earthquake Engineering Co. Ltd.WuhanChina

Personalised recommendations