Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Investigation of the Inclined Pullout Behavior of Anchors Embedded in Clay

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-dimensional plane strain finite element analysis has been used to simulate the inclined pullout behavior of strip anchors embedded in cohesive soil. Previous studies by other researchers were mainly concerned with plate anchors subjected to loads perpendicular to their longest axis and applied through the centre of mass. This paper investigates the behavior of vertical anchors subjected to pullout forces applied at various inclinations with respect to the longest anchor axis, and applied at the anchor top and through the centre of mass. The effects on the pullout behavior of embedment depth, overburden pressure, soil–anchor interface strength, anchor thickness, rate of clay strength increase, anchor inclination, load inclination and soil disturbance due to anchor installation were all studied. Anchor capacity is shown to increase with load inclination angle for anchors loaded through the centre of mass; greater effects are found for higher embedments. The results also show that anchor capacity improves at a decreasing rate with higher rates of increase of soil shear strength with depth. In addition, the capacity of vertically loaded anchors is shown to approximately double when the soil–anchor interface condition changes from fully separated to fully bonded. Similarly, disturbed clay strengths adjacent to the anchor following installation cause a significant reduction in anchor capacity. The results showed a significant effect of the point of load application for anchors inclined and normally loaded. The effects of other parameters, such as anchor thickness, were found to be less significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B :

Anchor length (m)

C u :

Clay undrained shear strength (kN/m2)

C interface :

Shear strength at anchor interface (kN/m2)

D :

Caisson diameter (m)

E :

Young’s modulus (kN/m2)

H :

Embedment depth (distance from ground surface to anchor tip) (m)

H c :

Critical depth (m)

H :

Distance between ground surface and anchor centre of mass (m)

K o :

Lateral earth pressure coefficient

L :

Caisson length (m)

N c :

Breakout factor

N c :

Breakout factor for unbonded condition

N c * :

Breakout factor for fully bonded condition

N coρ :

Inhomogeneous breakout factor

N coψ :

Breakout factor for inclined anchor in weightless soil

N co90 :

Breakout factor for vertical anchor in weightless soil

N v :

Breakout factor in the vertical direction

N h :

Breakout factor in the horizontal direction

P :

Ultimate load/unit length (kN/m)

q h :

Overburden pressure (kN/m2)

q u :

Applied pressure required to cause undrained failure (kN/m2)

S :

Coefficient for the effect of overburden pressure on anchor capacity

S t :

Soil sensitivity

t :

Anchor thickness (m)

β :

Anchor inclination to the vertical (°)

γ :

Soil unit weight (kN/m3)

φ :

Angle of internal friction (°)

ρ :

Rate of increase of undrained shear strength per unit length (kN/m2/m)

ν :

Poisson’s ratio

σ v :

Effective overburden stress (kN/m2)

α :

Adhesion factor

ψ :

Angle between the vertical plane and the pullout direction (°)

θ :

Load inclination angle to the vertical (°)

References

  • Aubeny CP, Murff JD (2005) Simplified limit solutions for the capacity of suction anchors under undrained conditions. Ocean Eng 32:864–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubeny CP, Moon SK, Murff JD (2001) Lateral undrained resistance of suction caisson anchors. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 11:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubeny CP, Han S, Murff JD (2003a) Refined model for inclined load capacity of suction caissons. In: Proceedings of 22 international conference offshore mechanics and arctic engineering 3: 883–887

  • Aubeny CP, Murff JD, Moon SK (2003b) Inclined load capacity of suction caissons. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 27:1235–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang S, Jones K, Kim YS, Cho Y (2011) Horizontal capacity of embedded suction anchors in clay. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 133:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Tho KK, Leung CF, Chow YK (2013) Influence of overburden pressure and soil rigidity on uplift behavior of square plate anchor in uniform clay. Comput Geotech 136:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwill RD (1996) Marine drag anchor behavior-a centrifuge modeling and theoretical investigation. PhD thesis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Das BM, Puri VK (1989) Holding capacity of inclined square plate anchors in clay. Soils Found J 29:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das BM, Shin EC (1993) Uplift capacity of rigid vertical metal piles in clay under inclined pull. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 3:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khatib S, Randolph MP (2004) Finite element modeling of drag-in plate anchor installation. In: Pietruszczak S, Pande GN (eds) Numerical models in geomechanics. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 541–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn MJ (1980) Limit analysis of undrained stability problems using a very small computer. In: Randolph MF, Zytynski M (eds) Computer applications in geotechnical problems in highway engineering. PM Geotechnical Analysts, Cambridge, pp 5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M, Lancellota R, Marchetti S, Nova R, Pasqualini E (1979) Design parameters for soft clays. In: General Report, Proceedings of 7th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 5, pp 27–57

  • Liu J, Wu L–L, Hu Y-X (2006) Pullout capacity of circular plate anchors in NC clay. J Dalian Univ Technol 46:716–723

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie TR (1955) Strength of deadman anchors in clay. MS thesis, Princeton University

  • Merifield RS, Sloan SW, Yu HS (2001) Stability of plate anchors in undrained clay. Geotechnique 51:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merifield RS, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW, Yu HS (2003) Three-dimensional lower bound solutions for stability of plate anchors in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merifield RS, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2005) Stability of inclined strip anchors in purely cohesive soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:792–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill MP, Bransby MF, Randolph MF (2003) Drag anchor fluke-soil interaction in clays. Can Geotech J 40:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaxis 2D-Version 8 Manuals (2006). Plaxis bv, Delft, Netherlands

  • Ranjan G, Arora VB (1980) Model studies on anchors under horizontal pull in clay. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Australia-New Zealand conference on geomechanics. Institution of Engineers, Sydney, Australia, vol 1, pp 65–70

  • Rao SN, Ravi R, Prasad BS (1997) Pullout behavior of suction anchors in soft marine clays. Mar Geosour Geotech 15:95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK (1978) Soil structure interaction analysis and its application to the prediction of anchor behavior. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Australia

  • Rowe RK, Davis EH (1982) The behavior of plate anchors in clay. Geotechnique 32:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple R, Rigden WJ (1984) Shaft capacity of driven pipe in clay. In: Meyer JR (ed) Analysis and design of pile foundations. ACSE, New York, pp 59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Hu Y, Randolph MF (2008) Numerical simulation of vertical pullout of plate anchors in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134:866–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Z, Hu Y, O’Loughlin C, Randolph MF (2009) Loss in anchor embedment during plate anchor keying in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:1475–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Langen H, Vermeer PA (1991) Interface elements for singular plasticity points. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 15:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM (1990) Soil behavior and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Murff JD, Aubeny CP (2010) Undrained capacity of plate anchors under general loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136:1383–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Liu J, Kong X-J, Hu Y (2011) Numerical study on plate anchor stability in clay. Geotechnique 61:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. de Bruyn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fahmy, A.M., de Bruyn, J.R. & Newson, T.A. Numerical Investigation of the Inclined Pullout Behavior of Anchors Embedded in Clay. Geotech Geol Eng 31, 1525–1542 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9676-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9676-9

Keywords

Navigation