Abstract
Most of the testing procedures to determine liquid limit and plastic limit are strength based with the assumption that, irrespective of the soil type, the strengths at these limiting water contents are considered to be unique, being equal to 1.7 and 170 kN/m2, respectively. Based on this, the plastic limit has been redefined as the water content at which there is a 100-fold increase in undrained strength as compared to that of liquid limit water content, and the range of water contents producing this strength variation as the plasticity index. However, published data from the various literature sources clearly show that the variation of undrained shear strength at the liquid limit water content is observed to be nearly sixty times, and that at plastic limit is more than seventeen times, and hence, no unique value of undrained strength can be assigned either at the liquid limit or plastic limit of soils. The variation of undrained strength with water content has been well documented in literature. Thus, uniqueness of strength at liquid limit or plastic limit, which is nothing but water holding capacity of soils at different state of consistencies, is not tenable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-dahlaki H, Al-Sharify GA (2008) A proposed approach for plastic limit determination using the drop-cone penetrometer device. J Eng Dev 12(1):107–117
Bell FG (2002) The geotechnical properties of some till deposits occurring along the coastal areas of eastern England. Eng Geol 63:49–68
Belviso R, Ciampoli S, Cotecchia V, Federico A (1985) Use of the cone penetrometer to determine consistency limits. Ground Eng 18(5):21–22
Berilgen SA, Kılıç, H, Özaydın K (2007) Determination of undrained shear strength for dredged golden horn marine clay with laboratory tests. Proceedings of the Sri Lankan geotechnical society’s first international conference on soil & rock engineering, August 5–11, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Campbell DJ (1976) Plastic limit determination using a drop cone penetrometer. Soil Sci 27(3):295–300
Campbell DJ (1983) Discussion. Gêotechnique 33(1):78–79
Casagrande A (1932) Research on the atterberg limits of soils. Public Roads 13(3):121–130 (136)
Casagrande A (1958) Notes on the design of the liquid limit device. Gêotechnique 8(2):84–91
Dennehy JP (1978) The remoulded undrained shear strength of cohesive soils and its influence on the suitability of embankment fill. In: proceedings of international conference on clay fills. Institution of Engineers, London, pp. 87–94
Edil TB, Benson CH (2009) Comparison of basic laboratory test results with more sophisticated laboratory and in situ tests methods on soils in southeastern Wisconsin. Final report of Wisconsin highway research program #0092-06-05, pp. 11–12
Federico A (1983) Relationships (Cu–w) and (Cu–s) for remolded clayey soils at high water content. Riv Ital Geotech 17(1):38–41
Feng TW (2004) Using a small ring and a fall-cone to determine the plastic limit. J Geotech Geoenvi Eng 130(6):630–635
Hansbo S (1957) A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by fall-cone test. Proceedings of Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute, vol 14, pp. 7–47
Harison JA (1988) Using the BS cone penetrometer for the determination of the plastic limit of soils. Gêotechnique 38(3):433–438
Hong Z, Liuz S, Shen S, Negami T (2006) Comparison in Undrained Shear Strength between Undisturbed and Remolded Ariake Clays. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 132(2):272–275
Houlsby GT (1982) Theoretical analysis of the fall cone test. Geotechnique 32(2):111–118
Houlsby GT (1983) Discussion. Gêotechnique 33(4):463
Kayabali K, Tufenkci OO (2010) Shear strength of remolded soils at consistency limits. Can Geotech J 47(3):259–266
Kenney TC (1963) Atterberg limits, correspondence. Gêotechnique 13(2):159–162
Koumoto T, Houlsby GT (2001) Theory and practice of the fall cone test. Gêotechnique 51(8):701–712
Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1979) Soil mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 31
Lee LT (2004) Predicting geotechnical parameters for dredged materials using the slump test method and index property correlations. DOER Technical Notes collection (ERDC TN-DOER-D-1), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi. http://www.wes.army.mil/el/dots/doer
Lee LT, Freeman RB (2009) Dual-weight fall cone method for simultaneous liquid limit determination. J Geotech Geoenvi Eng 135(1):158–161
Leroueil S, Tavenas F, Le Bihan JP (1983) Propriétés caractéristiques des argiles de l’est du canada (Characteristic properties of eastern Canada clays). Can Geotech J 20(4):681–705
Locat J, Demers D (1988) Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays. Can Geotech J 25(4):799–806
Nagaraj HB, Sridharan A (2010) An Improved k o -stress method of determining liquid limit of soils. Int J Geotech Eng 4(4):549–555
Norman LEJ (1958) A comparison of values of liquid limit determined with apparatus having bases of different hardness. Gêotechnique 8(2):79–83
Prakash K (2003) Discussion. J Geotech Geoenvi Eng 129(8):774–779
Prakash K, Sridharan A (2006) Critical appraisal of the cone penetration method of determining soil plasticity. Can Geotech J 43(5):884–888
Rao HY (1987) Determination of Atterberg limits by cone penetrometer. In: Proceedings of 8th asian regional conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1. Kyoto, pp. 81–84
Rashid ASA, Kassim KA, Katimon A, Noor NM (2008) Determination of Plastic limit of soil using modified methods. Malays J Civ Eng 20(2):295–305
Romana M, Vásárhelyi B (2007) A discussion on the decrease of unconfined compressive strength between saturated and dry rock samples. Proceedings of 11th congress of the international society for rock mechanics vol 1. Lisbon, pp. 139–142
Sampson LR, Netterberg F (1985) The cone penetration index: a simple new soil index test to replace the plasticity index. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vo1 2. San Fransisco, pp. 1041–1048
Schofield AN, Wroth CP (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGraw Hill, London, p 310
Sharma B, Bora KP (2003) Plastic limit, liquid limit and undrained shear strength of soil-reappraisal. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 129(8):774–777
Sivakumar V, Glynn D, Cairns P, Black JA (2009) A new method of measuring plastic limit of fine materials. Gêotechnique 59(10):813–823
Skempton AW, Northey RD (1953) The sensitivity of clays. Gêotechnique 3(1):30–53
Skopek J, Ter-stepanian G (1975) Comparison of liquid limit value determined according to Casagrande and Vasilev. Geotechnique 25(1):135–136
Sridharan A, Nagaraj HB (1999) Absorption water content and liquid limit of soils. Geotech Test J 22(2):127–133
Sridharan A, Prakash K (1998) Characteristic water content of a fine-grained soil-water system. Gêotechnique 48(3):337–346
Sridharan A, Prakash K (1999) Mechanisms controlling the undrained shear strength behaviour of clays. Can Geotech J 36(6):1030–1038
Sridharan A, Prakash K (2000) Percussion and cone methods of determining the liquid limit of soils: controlling mechanisms. Geotech Test J 23(2):236–244
Sridharan A, Venkatappa Rao G (1979) Shear strength behaviour of saturated clays and the role of effective stress concept. Gêotechnique 29(2):177–193
Sridharan A, Rao SM, Murthy NS (1986) Liquid limit of montmorillonite soils. Geotech Test J 9(3):156–159
Sridharan A, Rao SM, Murthy NS (1988) Liquid limit of kaolinitic soils. Gêotechnique 38(2):191–198
Sridharan A, Nagaraj HB, Prakash K (1999) Determination of the plasticity index from flow index. Geotech Test J 22(2):175–181
Sridharan A, Nagaraj HB, Prasad S (2000) Liquid limit of soils from equilibrium water content in one-dimensional normal compression. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers geotecholgy engineering, vol 143, pp. 165–169
Stone KJL, Phan KD (1995) Cone penetration tests near the plastic limit. Gêotechnique 45(1):155–158
Towner GD (1973) An examination of the fall cone method for the determination of some strength properties of remoulded agricultural soils. J Soil Sci 24(4):470–479
Trauner L, Dolinar B, Mišič M (2005) Relationship between the undrained shear strength, water content, and mineralogical properties of fine-grained soils. Int J Geomech 5(4):350–355
Wasti Y, Bezirci MH (1986) Determination of the consistency limits of soils by the fall cone test. Can Geotech J 23(2):241–246
Whyte IL (1982) Soil plasticity and strength: a new approach using extrusion. Ground Eng 15(1):16–24
Wood DM, Wroth CP (1978) The use of the cone penetrometer to determine the plastic limit of soils. Ground Eng 11(3):37
Wroth CP, Wood DM (1978) The correlation of index properties with some basic engineering properties of soils. Can Geotech J 15(2):137–145
Yilmaz I (2000) Evaluation of shear strength of clayey soils by using their liquidity index. Bull Eng Geol Env 59(3):227–229
Yong RN, Warkentin BP (1976) Introduction to soil behaviour. Macmillan, New York, p 96
Youseff MS, El Ramli AH, El Demery M (1965) Relationships between shear strength, consolidation, liquid limit, and plastic limit for remoulded clays. In Proceedings 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1. Montreal, pp. 126–129
Zreik DA, Germaine JT, Ladd CC (1997) Undrained strength of ultra-weak cohesive soils: relationship between water content and effective stress. Soils Found 37(3):117–128
Acknowledgments
The first author sincerely thanks his former graduate student Sravan Muguda for his active involvement in the preparation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagaraj, H.B., Sridharan, A. & Mallikarjuna, H.M. Re-examination of Undrained Strength at Atterberg Limits Water Contents. Geotech Geol Eng 30, 727–736 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9489-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9489-7