Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Ground Deformation Using Chemical Grouting for Pipeline Foundation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on experimental and numerical investigations, the present paper focuses on under ground scope (UGS) chemical grouting method that can actually improve the pipeline surrounding foundation to solve pipeline saggy damage. According to the experimental results, a solution-type injection material could make lager soil deformation, using less total slurry amount than suspension-type injection material. Therefore, a suspension-type injection material with shorter gel time is more suitable for the UGS method, making it more effective to reinforce the pipeline foundation and restore pipelines. The results of some patterns of injection tests revealed relationship between the behavior of the grouting material and the deformation of the soil. It is found that the material can be injected into a foundation by fracture grouting if the permeation coefficient is lower than 1.00 × 10−3 mm/s. The situation was analyzed by using 2-D finite element method analysis software Phase2, and the analysis result proposes that the real data and simulation data are nearly the same in impermeable soil. Furthermore, even if the construction object is permeable soil, it can also be become impermeable soil by two phases grouting: soil improvement grouting and restoration grouting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonio S (2001) Reconstruction of sanitary sewer by pipe bursting/crushing replacement process. Water system standard specifications for construction, item no. 900, Texas, pp 1–10

  • Chapman DN, Falk C, Rogers CDF, Stein D (1996) Experimental and analytical modelling of pipe bursting ground displacements. Trenchless Technol Res 11(1):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DN, Ng PCF, Karri R (2007) Research needs for on-line pipeline replacement techniques. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22(5–6):503–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando V, Moore ID (2001) Installation loads on new pipelines during pipe bursting. In: Proceedings of the international conference on underground infrastructure research, Canada, pp 89–93

  • Hill B, Esposito R (2002) Service pipe splitting project. In: Proceedings of the 17th international plastic fuel gas pipe symposium, California, pp 1–6

  • Komura M (2008) Research in pipeline position restoration by grouting. In: Proceedings of 19th japan symposium on trenchless technique, Japan, pp 191–197 (in Japanese)

  • Komura M (2009) Study on the behavior of the grout due to the location of the pipeline repair grouting. In: Proceedings of spring symposium on resources and materials in 2009, Japan, pp 37–38 (in Japanese)

  • Komura M, Araki K, Shimada H, Sasaoka T, Matsui K (2009) Fundamental study of the behavior of grouting material in the soil in the UGS method. In: Proceedings of 20th Japan symposium on trenchless technique, Japan, pp 45–52 (in Japanese)

  • Matsumoto C (1997) Recent conditions of sewage systems in Japan. J Jpn Sew Works Assoc 34(416):4–7 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards R, Elms DG, Budhu M (1993) Seismic bearing capacity and settlement of foundations. J Geotech Eng 119(4):662–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CDF, Chapman DN, Wan F, Ng PCF, Smith S (2002) Laboratory testing of pipe splitting operations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 17:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimada H, Khazaei S, Matsui K (2004) Small diameter tunnel excavation method using slurry pipe jacking. J Geotech Geol Eng 22(2):161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims WD (2001) Elements of success: pipe bursting in a sensitive area. In: Proceedings of the international conference on underground infrastructure research, Canada, pp 313–323

  • Yonekura R, Shimada S, Kinoshita Y (2000) Permanent grout injection method. Sankaido, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yotsumoto J, Kawai T, Shimada H, Khazaei S, Matsui K (2004) Fujisawa tackles flooding head on. Tunn Trenchless Constr 35(2):20–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable discussions with Mr. Masashi Komura and Mr. Shuichi Fujita. In addition, we thank Dr. Masatomo Ichinose for valuable suggestions and important feedback for the experimental result.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanlong Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimada, H., Chen, Y., Araki, K. et al. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Ground Deformation Using Chemical Grouting for Pipeline Foundation. Geotech Geol Eng 30, 289–297 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9467-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9467-0

Keywords

Navigation