Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization and Estimation of Geotechnical Variability in Ankara Clay: A Case History

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important component in reliability-based design is the geotechnical property variability. Generic estimates are used often, but calibration to a local geologic setting is preferable. In this case history, a methodology is shown that employs local geotechnical data to estimate the total variability, using Ankara Clay for illustration. A literature review is used to estimate the inherent variability, which is modeled as a random field with coefficient of variation (COV) and scale of fluctuation. The resulting inherent variability COVs are much smaller than the generic ranges. Local correlations between various laboratory and field tests and soil strength and compressibility parameters then are developed to quantify the transformation uncertainties. The various sources of uncertainty are combined through a second-moment method to estimate the total geotechnical variability as a function of the test type and correlation used. The results show: (1) the COVs for direct laboratory measurements are significantly smaller than those obtained through correlations, and (2) depending on the geotechnical data available, the local COVs can be very different from the generic guidelines. These could lead to unconservative designs. These issues are illustrated by a simple design example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aras IA, Turkmenoglu AG, Hakyemez HY (1991) The mineralogical and depositional environment of Ankara Clay. In: Zor M (ed) Proceedings, 5th national symposium on clay. Anatolian University, Eskisehir, Turkey, pp 87–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu GLS, Srivastava A, Murthy DSN (2006) Reliability analysis of the bearing capacity of a shallow foundation resting on cohesive soil. Can Geotech J 43:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecher GB (1985) Geotechnical error analysis. Special summer course 1.60 s. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecher GB, Ladd CC (1997) Formal observational approach to staged loading. Research Record 1582, Transportation Research Board, pp 49–52

  • Benjamin JR, Cornell CA (1970) Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Birand AA (1963) Study of the characteristics of Ankara Clays showing swelling properties. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Cassidy MJ, Uzielli M, Lacasse S (2008) Probability risk assessment of landslides: a case study at Finneidfjord. Can Geotech J 45:1250–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalermyanont T, Benson HC (2005) Reliability-based design for external stability of mechanically stabilized earth walls. Int J Geomech 5(3):196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cokca E (1991) Swelling potential of expansive soils with a critical appraisal of the identification of swelling of Ankara soils by methylene blue tests. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Doruk M (1968) Swelling properties of clays on the METU Campus. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Erguler ZA, Ulusay R (2003) A simple test and predictive models for assessing swell potential of Ankara (Turkey) Clay. Eng Geol 67(3–4):331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol O (1973) Ankara sehri cevresinin jeomorfolojik ana birimleri. AUDTCF Yayinlari 240 (in Turkish)

  • Filippas OB, Kulhawy FH, Grigoriu MD (1988) Reliability-based foundation design for transmission line structures: uncertainties in soil property measurement. Report EL-5507(3), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

  • Furtun U (1989) An investigation on Ankara soils with regard to swelling. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Haldar S, Babu GLS (2008) Reliability measures for pile foundations based on cone penetration test data. Can Geotech J 45:1699–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt GM (1966) Statistical analysis of data from comparative laboratory test program sponsored by ACIL. Miscellaneous Paper 4-785, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss

  • Huang F-K, Wang GS (2007) ANN-based reliability analysis for deep excavation. EUROCON 2007, the international conference on “computer as a tool”, Warsaw, pp 2039–2046

  • Johnston MM (1969) Laboratory comparison tests using compacted fine-grained soils. In: Proceedings, 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1, Mexico City, pp 197–202

  • Kasapoglu KE (2000) Ankara kenti zeminlerinin jeoteknik ozellikleri ve depremselligi. Jeoloji Muhendisleri Odasi Yayinlari, no 54, Ankara

  • Kocyigit A, Turkmenoglu A (1991) Geology and mineralogy of the so-called Ankara Clay formation: a geologic approach to the Ankara Clay problem. In: Proceedings, 5th national symposium on clay, Anatolian University, Eskisehir, Turkey, pp 112–125

  • Kulhawy FH (1992) On evaluation of static soil properties. In: Seed RB, Boulanger RW (eds) Stability and performance of slopes and embankments II (GSP 31). ASCE, New York, pp 95–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Report EL-6800. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Phoon KK (1996) Engineering judgment in the evolution from deterministic to reliability-based foundation design. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment (GSP 58). ASCE, New York, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Trautmann CH (1996) Estimation of in situ test uncertainty. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment (GSP 58). ASCE, New York, pp 269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Birgisson B, Grigoriu, MD (1992) Reliability-based foundation design for transmission line structures: transformation models for in situ tests. Report EL-5507(4), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

  • Lacasse S, Nadim F (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment (GSP 58). ASCE, New York, pp 49–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumb P (1971) Precision and accuracy of soil tests. In: Proceedings, 1st international conference on applications of statistics and probability in soil and structural engineering, Hong Kong, pp 329–345

  • Met I, Akgun H (2005) Composite landfill liner design with Ankara Clay, Turkey. Env Geol 47(6):795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minty EJ, Smith RB, Pratt DN (1979) Interlaboratory testing variability assessed for a wide range of N. S. W. soil types. In: Proceedings, 3rd international conference on applications of statistics and probability in soil and structural engineering, vol 1, Sydney, pp 221–235

  • Omay B (1970) Swelling clays on METU Campus. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Orchant CJ, Kulhawy FH, Trautmann CH (1988) Reliability-based foundation design for transmission line structures: critical evaluation of in situ test methods. Report EL-5507(2). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordemir I, Alyanak I, Birand AA (1965) Report on Ankara Clay. METU Publication No. 12, Ankara, Turkey

  • Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999a) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36(4):612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999b) Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can Geotech J 36(4):625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH, Grigoriu MD (1995) Reliability-based design of foundations for transmission line structures. Report TR-105000. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna F, Chameau JL (1991) Statistical evaluation of CPT and DMT measurements at the Heber Road site. In: McLean FG, Campbell DA, Harris DW (eds) Geotechnical engineering congress (GSP 27). ASCE, Boulder, pp 14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarigol SI (1988) A study on correlation of soil parameters for Ankara Clay. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Sezer GA, Turkmenoglu AG, Gokturk EH (2003) Mineralogical and sorption characteristics of Ankara Clay as a landfill liner. Appl Geochem 18(5):711–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood PT (1970) Reproducibility of results of soil classification and compaction tests. Report LR 339. Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Lee KL (1970) Variability in soil parameters. Proceedings, 8th annual engineering geology and soils engineering symposium, Idaho, pp 159–185

  • Surgel A (1976) A survey of the geotechnical properties of Ankara soils. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Teoman MB, Topal M, Isik NS (2004) Assessment of slope stability in Ankara Clay: a case study along E90 highway. Env Geol 45(7):963–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonoz MC, Gokceoglu C, Ulusay R (2003) A laboratory-scale experimental investigation on the performance of lime columns in expansive Ankara (Turkey) Clay. Bull Eng Geol Environ 62(2):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Uner, AK (1977) A comparison of engineering properties of two soil types in the Ankara region. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Vanmarcke EH (1977) Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 103(GT11):1227–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH (1983) Random fields: analysis and synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu G, Yin J–H, Graham J (2001) Consolidation modeling of soils under the test embankment at Chek Lap Kok International Airport in Hong Kong using a simplified finite element model. Can Geotech J 38(2):349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Gazi University, Celal Bayar Bulvari, Maltepe, Ankara, 06570, Turkey

    Sami O. Akbas

  2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hollister Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853-3501, USA

    Fred H. Kulhawy

Authors
  1. Sami O. Akbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fred H. Kulhawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami O. Akbas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akbas, S.O., Kulhawy, F.H. Characterization and Estimation of Geotechnical Variability in Ankara Clay: A Case History. Geotech Geol Eng 28, 619–631 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9320-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9320-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation