Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Organic Soils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents results from a laboratory investigation into the dynamic properties of natural intact and model organic soils by means of resonant-column tests. The natural intact organic soils were sands, cohesive soils and peats with varying content of calcium carbonate. The model organic soils were formed in laboratory by mixing kaolinite and paper pulp. The influence of various soil parameters, such as strain level, confining stress, void ratio, plasticity index, organic content and secondary consolidation time on shear modulus, G, and damping ratio, DT, is presented and discussed. The test results on natural organic soils show that only high organic contents (OC ≥ 25%) have significant influence on G and DT at both small and high shear strains. For the model organic soils, however, a significant influence of even lower values of organic content (5% ≤ OC ≤ 20%) on G at small strains and DT at both small and high strains is observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D4427-92 (2002) Classification of peat samples by laboratory testing. Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials’ Standard, Section 4, Volume 04.08

  • ASTM D2974-00 (2002) Standard test methods for moisture, ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials’ Standard, Section 4, Volume 04.08

  • ASTM D2487-00 (2002) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified soil classification system). Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials’ Standard, Section 4, Volume 04.08

  • ASTM D4015-92 (2002) Standard test method for modulus and damping of soils by the resonant-column method. Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials’ Standard, Section 4, Volume 04.08

  • ASTM D422-98 (2002) Standard test method for particle size analysis of soils. Annual Book of American Society for Testing and Materials’ Standard, Section 4, Volume 04.08

  • Boulanger R, Arulnathan R, Harder L, Torres R, Driller M (1998) Dynamic properties of Sherman Island Peat. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 124(1):12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker E, Ireland H (1965) Earth pressures at rest related to stress history. Can Geotech J 2:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • BS 1377 (1990) Determination of particle size distribution. British Standards, Part 2

  • Chiang Y, Chae Y (1972) Dynamic properties of cemented treated soils. Highway Res Rec 379:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristanis K (1987) Philippi: a peat deposit awaiting development. Int Peat J 2:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristanis K (1994) The genesis of the Nissi peatland (northwestern Greece) as an example of peat and lignite deposit formation in Greece. Int J Coal Geol 26:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R (1991) Low and high strain cyclic material properties. In: Proceedings, NSF/EPRI Workshop on Dynamic Soil Properties and Site Characterization, Palo Alto—California, 9–10 November 1989, NP-7337, Vol 1, Research Project 810-14, Ch. 3

  • Drnevich V (1967) Effects of strain history on the dynamic properties of sand. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, USA

  • Farrell ER, O’Neill C, Morris A (1994) Changes in the mechanical properties of soils with variations in organic content. In: Proceedings, International Workshop on Advances in Understanding and Modelling the Mechanic Behaviour of Peat, Delft-Neverlands, 16–18 June 1993, pp 19–25

  • Greek Seismic Code (GSC) (2000)

  • Hight D, Higgins K (1994) An approach to the prediction of ground movements in engineering practice: background & applications. In: Proceedings, 1st International Conference on Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Sapporo-Japan, 12–14 September 1994, Vol 2, pp 909–946

  • Jaky J (1944) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. J Union Hungarian Eng Architects 7:355–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine R (1992) Some observation on the kinematic nature of soil stiffness. Soils Found 32(2):111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallioglou P (2003) The study of dynamic properties of soils in resonant-column apparatus. PhD Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (in Greek)

  • Kallioglou P, Tika Th, Pitilakis K (2008) Shear modulus and damping ratio of cohesive soils. J Earthquake Eng (under press)

  • Karlsson R, Hansbo S (1981) Soil classification and identification. Swedish Counc Build Res D8:1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney T (1959) Discussion, journal of the soil mechanics and foundations division. ASCE 85(SM3):67–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Esashi Y (1982) Dynamic properties of soft clay for a wide strain range. Soils Found 22:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer S (1993) Seismic response—foundation in soft soils. Washington State Transportation Center. Final Technical Report, pp 135

  • Kramer S (1996) Dynamic response of peats. Washington State Transportation Center, Final Report, November 1996, pp 61

  • Kramer S (2000) Dynamic response of Mercer Slough peat. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 126(6):504–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuson W, Wahls H (1972) Time effects on dynamic shear modulus of clays. J Soil Mech Foundations Div, ASCE 98(SM12):1359–1373

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J (1976) Fundamentals of soil behaviour. Willey editions, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyakawa I (1960) Some aspects of road construction in peaty or marshy areas in Hokkaido, Civil Engineering Research Institute, Hokkaido Development Bureau, Sapporo, Japan

  • Saxena S, Avramidis A, Reddy K (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cemented sands at low strains. Can Geotech J 25:353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Wilson (1967) Thomson Way crossing of Union Bay, Seattle, Washington. Foundation Engineering Report Technical Supplement, November, pp 108

  • Skempton AW, Petley DJ (1970) Ignition loss and other properties of peats and clays from Avonmouth, King’s Lynn and Cranberry Moss. Geotechnique 20:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe KH II, Bay JA, Rosenbald BL, Hwang SK, Twede MR (1996) In situ seismic and dynamic laboratory measurements of geotechnical materials at Queensboro Bridge and Roosevelt Island. Geotechnical Engineering Report No. GR94-5, Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin, Texas

  • Sun J, Golesorkhi R, See H (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratio for cohesive soils. Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15

  • Tika Th, Kallioglou P, Papadopoulou A, Pitilakis K (2004) The influence of fines on the dynamic properties of sands. In: Procceedings, A. W. Skempton Memorial Conference, 29–31 March 2004. London, UK, pp 642–653

  • Tika Th, Koninis G, Kallioglou P (2005) Compressibility of organic soils. Internal Report, SMFE Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (in Greek)

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 117(1):89–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehling TM, Boulanger RW, Arulnathan R, Harder LF Jr, Driller MW (2003) Nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous organic soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 129(10):929–939

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations’ & Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    P. Kallioglou, Th. Tika, G. Koninis, St. Papadopoulos & K. Pitilakis

Authors
  1. P. Kallioglou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Th. Tika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Koninis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. St. Papadopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Pitilakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Kallioglou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kallioglou, P., Tika, T., Koninis, G. et al. Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Organic Soils. Geotech Geol Eng 27, 217–235 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9224-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9224-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation