Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decision-making environment of low-protein animal feeding in dairy and poultry farms in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-protein feeding is a strategy used to decrease nitrogen excretion and ammonia (NH3) emissions from animal manure, while maintaining productivity. The optimal protein content depends on many factors, including the type, age, and production level of the animal, as well as the availability, composition, and digestibility of the feed ingredients. Farmers in many developing countries lack information about the protein content of feed and about low-protein feeding, including those in China. This lack of information hinders the making of accurate NH3 emission inventories and strategies for reducing these emissions. We determined farmers’ knowledge and perceptions of low-protein feeding in 338 livestock farms, and the actual protein content of 591 feed samples collected from China. Farmers knew little about protein and low-protein feeding; they simply followed the instructions from feed-delivering companies or contracting companies. The mean protein content of the dairy cows’ diets (159 ± 20 g/kg DM) was relatively low. Layer hens’ diets had a mean protein content of 184 ± 22 g/kg DM, and 14% of their diets were in excess of requirement. Broiler farms used compound feed, of which 23% were in excess of requirement and 15% were deficient in protein. Overall, the mean protein contents were close to the recommended levels for low-protein animal feeding, according to national guidelines, which are similar to the guidelines of the National Research Council (NRC) of the United States. However, there were large variations between farms, suggesting the scope for improvement on many farms. Our research provides farmers, feed companies, policy makers, and institutions with useful information to improve feed management, and to improve the inventories and assessment of NH3 emissions from animal production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision

  • Bai ZH, Ma L, Oenema O, Chen Q, Zhang FS (2013) Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in dairy production in China. J Environ Qual 42(4):990–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Z, Ma L, Jin S, Ma W, Velthof GL, Oenema O, Liu L, Chadwick D, Zhang F (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium flows through the manure management chain in China. Environ Sci Technol 50(24):13409–13418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Z, Ma W, Ma L, Velthof GL, Wei Z, Havlík P, Oenema O, Lee MR, Zhang F (2018) China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci Adv 4(7):eaar8534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Banhazi TM, Lehr H, Black JL, Crabtree H, Schofield P, Tscharke M, Berckmans D (2012) Precision livestock farming: an international review of scientific and commercial aspects. Int J Agric Biol Eng 5(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Z, Winiwarter W, Klimont Z, Velthof G, Misselbrook T, Zhao Z, Jin X, Oenema O, Hu C, Ma L, (2019) Further improvement of air quality in China needs clear ammonia mitigation target. Environ Sci Technol. 52(18):10542–10544.

  • Bittman S, Dedina M, Howard CM, Oenema O, Sutton MA, (eds) (2014), Options for ammonia mitigation: guidance from the UNECE task force on reactive nitrogen, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh

  • Bonnet S, Geraert PA, Lessire M, Carre B, Guillaumin S (1997) Effect of high ambient temperature on feed digestibility in broilers. Poult Sci 76(6):857–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canh TT, Aarnink AJA, Schutte JB, Sutton A, Langhout DJ, Verstegen MWA (1998) Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing–finishing pigs. Livest Prod Sci 56(3):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castle EN, Becker MH, Smith FJ (1972). Farm business management: the decision making process. Farm business management: the decision making process. Second Edition

  • Colmenero JO, Broderick GA (2006) Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89(5):1704–1712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham FE, Cotterill OJ, Funk EM (1960) The effect of season and age of bird: 1. On Egg Size, Quality and Yield. Poultry Science, 39(2), pp.289–299.

  • Dou Z, Galligan DT, Ramberg CF Jr, Meadows C, Ferguson JD (2001) A survey of dairy farming in Pennsylvania: nutrient management practices and implications. J Dairy Sci 84(4):966–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enting I, Wang B, Zhang X, Van Duinkerken G (2010). The animal feed chain in China: opportunities to enhance quality and safety arrangements. Ministry Agric Nat Food Qual

  • Fouad AM, Chen W, Ruan D, Wang S, Xia WG, Zheng CT (2016) Impact of heat stress on meat, egg quality, immunity and fertility in poultry and nutritional factors that overcome these effects: a review. Int J Poult Sci 15(3):81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frank B, Swensson C (2002) Relationship between content of crude protein in rations for dairy cows and milk yield, concentration of urea in milk and ammonia emissions. J Dairy Sci 85(7):1829–1838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank B, Persson M, Gustafsson G (2002) Feeding dairy cows for decreased ammonia emission. Livest Prod Sci 76(1–2):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller FH, Huang J, Ma H, Rozelle S (2005) The rapid rise of China's dairy sector: factors behind the growth in demand and supply

  • Furlan RL, Faria Filho DE, de Rosa PS, Macari M (2004) Does low-protein diet improve broiler performance under heat stress conditions? Braz J Poultry Sci 6(2):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000200001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z, Ma W, Zhu G, Roelcke M (2013) Estimating farm-gate ammonia emissions from major animal production systems in China. Atmos Environ 79:20–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves M, Zibarras LD, Stride C (2013) Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. J Environ Psychol 34:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M, Havlík P, Valin H, Notenbaert A, Rufino MC, Thornton PK, Blümmel M, Weiss F, Grace D, Obersteiner M (2013) Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(52):20888–20893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hijbeek R, Pronk AA, van Ittersum MK, Verhagen A, Ruysschaert G, Bijttebier J, Zavattaro L, Bechini L, Schlatter N, ten Berge HFM (2019) Use of organic inputs by arable farmers in six agro-ecological zones across Europe: drivers and barriers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 275:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y, Velthof GL, Oenema O (2015) Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta-analysis and integrated assessment. Glob Change Biol 21(3):1293–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hristov AN, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, Firkins J, Rotz A, Dell C, Adesogan A, Yang W, Tricarico J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Dijkstra J, Oosting S (2013) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production—–a review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. Edited by Pierre J. Gerber, Benjamin Henderson and Harinder P.S. Makkar. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 177. FAO, Rome, Italy

  • IAESD and NIES (2009) The first national survey of pollution sources—livestock and poultry production excrete coefficients manual handbook. The first national survey of pollution sources leading group office.

  • Kerr BJ, Kidd MT (1999) Amino acid supplementation of low-protein broiler diets: 1. glutamic acid and indispensable amino acid supplementation. J Appl Poultry Res 8:298–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW, Less JF, Wang L, Yan T, Kiron V, Kaushik SJ, Lei XG (2019) Meeting global feed protein demand: challenge, opportunity, and strategy. Ann Rev Animal Biosci

  • Komarek AM, Bell LW, Whish JP, Robertson MJ, Bellotti WD (2015) Whole-farm economic, risk and resource-use trade-offs associated with integrating forages into crop–livestock systems in western China. Agric Syst 133:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Cyriac J, Knowlton KF, Marr LC, Gay SW, Hanigan MD, Ogejo JA (2009) Effects of reducing dietary nitrogen on ammonia emissions from manure on the floor of a naturally ventilated free stall dairy barn at low (0–20 °C) temperatures. J Environ Qual 38(6):2172–2181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • López‐Aizpún M, Horrocks CA, Charteris AF, Marsden KA, Ciganda VS, Evans JR, Chadwick DR, Cárdenas LM (2020) Meta‐analysis of global livestock urine‐derived nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils. Glob Change Biol

  • McDonald MW (1979) Lysine and methionine supplements in diets for laying pullets. Aust J Agric Res 30(5):983–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry: ninth revised edition, 1994. The National Academies Press, Washington, https://doi.org/10.17226/2114

  • Oenema J, Oenema O, (2021). Intensification of grassland-based dairy production and its impacts on land, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies. Front Agric Sci Eng 8(1):130–147

  • State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and Standardization Administration (SA) (2018) National standard of People’s Republic of China: formula feeds for layers and broilers. T/CFLAS 002-2018

  • Oenema J, Van Keulen H, Schils RLM, Aarts HFM (2011) Participatory farm management adaptations to reduce environmental impact on commercial pilot dairy farms in the Netherlands. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci 58(1–2):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portejoie S, Dourmad JY, Martinez J, Lebreton Y (2004) Effect of lowering dietary crude protein on nitrogen excretion, manure composition and ammonia emission from fattening pigs. Livest Prod Sci 91(1–2):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JM, Li Y, Wu Z, Broderick GA, Holmes BJ (2008) Rapid assessment of feed and manure nutrient management on confinement dairy farms. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 82(2):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu QB, Yang P, Zhao R, Zhi SL, Zhai ZW, Ding FF, Zhang KQ (2017) Prediction of fecal nitrogen and phosphorus excretion for Chinese Holstein lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci 95(8):3487–3496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Reis S, Howard C, Sutton MA (eds) (2015) Costs of ammonia abatement and the climate co-benefits. Springer

  • Reijneveld A, Termorshuizen A, Vedder H, Oenema O (2014b) Strategy for innovation in soil tests illustrated for P tests. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 45(4):498–515

  • Rizzi C, Chiericato GM (2005) Organic farming production. Effect of age on the productive yield and egg quality of hens of two commercial hybrid lines and two local breeds. Italian J Animal Sci 4(sup3):160–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Roslaes M, De Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow. Environmental issues and options. FAO report, Rome, Italy

  • Steinmetz H, Knappstein M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P, Kabst R (2016) How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? Zeitschrift für Psychologie

  • Tan M, Hou Y, Zhang L, Shi S, Long W, Ma Y, Zhang T, Li F, Oenema O (2021) Operational costs and neglect of end-users are the main barriers to improving manure treatment in intensive livestock farms. J Clean Prod 289:125149

  • Tomlinson AP, Powers WJ, Van Horn HH, Nordstedt RA, Wilcox CJ (1996) Dietary protein effects on nitrogen excretion and manure characteristics of lactating cows. Trans ASAE 39(4):1441–1448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Valkengoed AM, Steg L (2019) Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behavior. Nat Clim Chang 9(2):158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandeHaar MJ, St-Pierre N (2006) Major advances in nutrition: relevance to the sustainability of the dairy industry. J Dairy Sci 89:12801291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velthof GL, Van Bruggen C, Groenestein CM, De Haan BJ, Hoogeveen MW, Huijsmans JFM (2012) A model for inventory of ammonia emissions from agriculture in the Netherlands. Atmos Environ 46:248–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Dou Z, Ma L, Ma W, Sims JT, Zhang F (2010) Nitrogen mass flow in China's animal production system and environmental implications. J Environ Qual 39(5):1537–1544

  • Wang C, Liu JX, Makkar HPS, Wei NB, Xu QM (2014) Production level, feed conversion efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency of dairy production systems in China. Trop Anim Health Prod 46(4):669–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yang J, Liang J, Qiang Y, Fang S, Gao M, Fan X, Yang G, Zhang B, Feng Y (2018) Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management in a water source protection area in China. Sci Total Environ 633:1126–1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Zhang R, Klein KK (2009) Perceived information needs and availability: results of a survey of small dairy farmers in Inner Mongolia. Inf Res 14(3)

  • Zhang N, Bai Z, Winiwarter W, Ledgard S, Luo J, Liu J, Guo Y, Ma L, (2019) Reducing ammonia emissions from dairy cattle production via cost-effective manure management techniques in China. Environ Sci Technol 53(20):11840–11848

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences [Grant Number PSA-SA-E-01] and the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [Grant Number 2016YFE0103100]. We acknowledge the willingness and hospitability of all the livestock farmers who participated in this research. Officers of the Agricultural Bureaus in Hebei and Shandong provided helpful suggestions for the interviews and information on the location of farmers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Hou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 910 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, M., Hou, Y., Zhang, L. et al. Decision-making environment of low-protein animal feeding in dairy and poultry farms in China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 127, 85–96 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10295-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10295-9

Keywords

Navigation