Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil greenhouse gas emissions from an animal excrement-based forage cropping system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to investigate the impacts of animal excrement-derived organic soil amendments on N2O, CH4, and heterotrophic CO2 emissions and net soil-associated greenhouse gas balances under an Italian ryegrass and forage corn double-cropping system on an Andosol in southwestern Japan. The experiment consisted of five treatments with three replicates: no nitrogen, chemical fertilizer (CF), composted dairy cattle manure (CCM), dairy slurry (DS), and digestate from biogas production (DBP). There were no significant differences in cumulative soil N2O emissions over three years among the CF, CCM, DS, and DBP treatments. Although N2O emission factors (a percent ratio of N2O-N emitted to N applied) were all quite low, the factor for composted dairy cattle manure (0.00 ± 0.02%) was significantly lower than that for chemical fertilizer (0.06 ± 0.01%). The soil was a net CH4 sink, and there were no significant differences in cumulative CH4 emissions among the five treatments. Soil CO2 emissions (i.e., heterotrophic soil respiration) increased in proportion to the organic carbon inputs from organic soil amendments. For dairy slurry, which contains abundant labile organic carbon, the decomposition of organic carbon was more pronounced during the summer corn season than during the winter ryegrass season. The contributions of soil N2O and CH4 emissions to soil-associated net greenhouse gas balance were negligible on a CO2-equivalent basis. All five treatments acted as a net source of greenhouse gases, but the CCM and DS treatments mitigated greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere in comparison with the CF treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiyama H, Yan X, Yagi K (2006) Estimations of emission factors for fertilizer-induced direct N2O emissions from agricultural soils in Japan: Summary of available data. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:774–787

  • Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Amon T, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2006) Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baral KR, Arthur E, Olesen JE, Petersen SO (2016) Predicting nitrous oxide emissions from manure properties and soil moisture: An incubation experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 97:112–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai M, Flesch T, Trouvé R, Coates T, Butterly C, Bhatta B, Hill J, Chen D (2020) Gas emissions during cattle manure composting and stockpiling. J Environ Qual 49:228–235

  • Bolinder MA, Crotty F, Elsen A, Frac M, Kismányoky T, Lipiec J, Tits M, Tóth Z, Kätterer T (2020) The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon changes in agroecosystems: a synthesis of reviews. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 25:929–952

  • Bracken CJ, Lanigan GJ, Richards KG et al (2021) Source partitioning using N2O isotopomers and soil WFPS to establish dominant N2O production pathways from different pasture sward compositions. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Phil Trans R Soc B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cambareri G, Wagner-Riddle C, Drury C, Lauzon J, Salas W (2017) Anaerobically digested dairy manure as an alternative nitrogen source to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions in fall-fertilized corn. Can J Soil Sci 97:439–451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens J, Huschka A (2001) The effect of biological oxygen demand for cattle slurry and soil moisture on nitrous oxide emissions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren RA, Saigusa M, Ugolini FC (2004) The nature, properties and management of volcanic soils. Adv Agron 82:113–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson G, Ferrero F, Bava L, Borreani G, Dal Prà A, Pacchioli MT, Sandrucci A, Zucali M, Tabacco E (2020) Forage systems and sustainability of milk production: Feed efficiency, environmental impacts and soil carbon stocks. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigatti M, Girolamo GD, Chincarini R, Ciavatta C, Barbanti L (2011) Potential nitrogen mineralization, plant utilization efficiency and soil CO2 emissions following the addition of anaerobic digested slurries. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4619–4629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48:115–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holly MA, Larson RA, Powell JM, Ruark MD, Aguirre-Villegas H (2017) Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from digested and separated dairy manure during storage and after land application. Agric Ecosyst Environ 239:410–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) Chapter 11. N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. In: Klein CD et al. (eds) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol 4, Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_11_Ch11_N2O&CO2.pdf

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • Junior CC, Cerri CEP, Pires AV, Cerri CC (2015) Net greenhouse gas emissions from manure management using anaerobic digestion technology in a beef cattle feedlot in Brazil. Sci Total Environ 505:1018–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katayanagi N, Hatano R (2005) Spatial variability of greenhouse gas fluxes from soils of various land uses on a livestock farm in Southern Hokkaido, Japan. Phyton 45:309–318

  • Kitamura R, Sugiyama C, Yasuda K, Nagatake A, Yuan Y, Du J, Yamaki N, Taira K, Kawai M, Hatano R (2021) Effects of three types of organic fertilizers on greenhouse gas emissions in a grassland on Andosol in Southern Hokkaido, Japan. Front Sustain Food Syst. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.649613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köster JR, Cárdenas LM, Bol R, Lewicka-Szczebak D, Senbayram M, Well R, Giesemann A, Dittert K (2015) Anaerobic digestates lower N2O emissions compared to cattle slurry by affecting rate and product stoichiometry of denitrification – An N2O isotopomer case study. Soil Biol Biochem 84:65–74

  • Kumamoto Prefecture (2013) Fertilizer recommendations 2013 for Kumamoto green agriculture. 3–7 Forage crops. https://www.pref.kumamoto.jp/soshiki/74/854.html (in Japanese)

  • Linn DM, Doran JW (1984) Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1267–1272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Wen Y, Wang D, Sun X, Hill PW, Macdonald A, Chadwick DR, Wu L, Jones DL (2020) Farmyard manure applications stimulate soil carbon and nitrogen cycling by boosting microbial biomass rather than changing its community composition. Soil Biol Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (2021) Results from the national survey on the treatments of animal feces in 2019. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/chikusan/kankyo/taisaku/pdf/H31_syori-joukyou.pdf (in Japanese)

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (2022) Circumstances of agricultural soils in Japan. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/kankyo/attach/pdf/tuchi_kanren-8.pdf (in Japanese)

  • Mori A (2021) Farmyard manure application and associated root proliferation improve the net greenhouse gas balance of Italian ryegrass – Maize double-cropping field in Nasu, Japan. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mori A, Hojito M (2015) Effect of dairy manure type on the carbon balance of mowed grassland in Nasu, Japan: comparison between manure slurry plus synthetic fertilizer plots and farmyard manure plus synthetic fertilizer plots. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61:736–746

  • Mukumbuta I, Shimizu M, Jin T, Nagatake A, Hata H, Kondo S, Kawai M, Hatano R (2017) Nitrous and nitric oxide emissions from a cornfield and managed grassland: 11 years of continuous measurement with manure and fertilizer applications, and land-use change. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1291265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obara H, Ohkura T, Takata Y, Kohyama K, Maejima Y, Hamazaki T (2011) Comprehensive soil classification system of Japan First approximation. Bull Natl Inst Agro-Environ Sci 29:1–73 (in Japanese with English summary)

  • Qin Z, Deng S, Dunn J, Smith P, Sun W (2021) Animal waste use and implications to agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac04d7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Saunders OE, Fortuna A, Harrison JH, Cogger CG, Whitefield E, Green T (2012) Gaseous nitrogen and bacterial responses to raw and digested dairy manure applications in incubated soils. Environ Sci Technol 46:11684–11692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu M, Marutani S, Desyatkin AR, Jin T, Hata H, Hatano R (2009) The effect of manure application on carbon dynamics and budgets in a managed grassland of Southern Hokkaido, Japan Agric Ecosyst Environ 130:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BW, Hao X (2017) Nitrous oxide emitted from soil receiving anaerobically digested solid cattle manure. J Environ Qual 46:741–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane T, Yamada I (2009) Nitrous oxide emission from cattle manure compost pellets applied to Andosols. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 80:403–407 (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Zhu B, Wang S, Zhu X, Vereecken H, Brüggemann N (2017) Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 23:4068–4083

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express special thanks to Ms. Keiko Morita, Ms. Keiko Furukawa, Ms. Mao Ueno, and Ms. Sayoko Hirayama for sampling and analysis of gas, soil, and plant samples. We are also indebted to Mr. Koichi Hatanaka, Mr. Yasushi Kiyomura, and Mr. Hiroyuki Ito from the Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, NARO for their support in set-up and management of the experimental field. The advice and support provided by Dr. Shigeto Sudo from the Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, NARO was a great help in gas chromatography analysis. This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan through a national research project entitled “Development of climate change mitigation technology in the livestock sector”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuhisa Koga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 3276 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koga, N., Ihara, H., Yamane, T. et al. Soil greenhouse gas emissions from an animal excrement-based forage cropping system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 123, 153–167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-022-10214-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-022-10214-4

Keywords

Navigation