Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 125–138 | Cite as

Soil extracellular enzyme activities under long-term fertilization management in the croplands of China: a meta-analysis

  • Fuhong Miao
  • Yuan Li
  • Song Cui
  • Sindhu Jagadamma
  • Guofeng YangEmail author
  • Qingping ZhangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The effects of fertilization and residue retention practices on enhancing crop yield and soil productivity, have been extensively investigated in various cropping system studies. However, various potential interactions exist among system components (soil, plant, microbial). The multitude and complexity of these interactions results in variability in agroecological responses, such as the soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs). Using a meta-analysis of 85 peer-reviewed articles published in the past three decades, we synthesized the EEAs of four major soil enzymes (urease, phosphatase, invertase, and peroxidase), which are affected by various fertilization and residue management practices used in cropping systems of China. The combined application of straw residues and chemical fertilizers, and straw residues only significantly increased soil organic carbon (by 38 and 47%, respectively) and total nitrogen (by 26 and 57%, respectively) as compared to the non-fertilized control. Manure plus chemical fertilizer treatments showed a consistent increase in urease, phosphatase and invertase activity by 86, 34 and 37%, respectively, as compared to the non-fertilized control. The use of inorganic fertilizers increased the activity of soil EEAs involved in carbon- and phosphorus-cycling, but did not decrease EEAs involved in nitrogen-cycling as expected. The experimental duration had a significant impact on urease activity, particularly with unbalanced application of chemical fertilizers. Therefore, along with managing fertilizer type, considerable attention should be given to adopting alternative production systems and increasing cropping intensity (preferably double cropping), to enhance soil EEAs.

Keywords

Cropping intensity Extracellular enzyme Fertilization duration Residue management Soil carbon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We highly appreciate two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their very insightful and constructive comments. This research was supported by grants from the Forage Industrial Innovation Team, Shandong Modern Agricultural Industrial and Technical System (SDAIT-23), Doctoral Scientific Research Startup of Qingdao Agricultural University (6631116024), and the China Scholarship Council (File no. 201,606,180,104). The authors are very grateful for revisions to the manuscript by Kathleen K. Treseder (University of California, Irvine), and for plotting the maps by Qisheng Feng (Lanzhou University).

Supplementary material

10705_2019_9991_MOESM1_ESM.docx (463 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 462 kb)

References

  1. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1471–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(99)00051-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banger K, Toor GS, Biswas A, Sidhu SS, Sudhir K (2010) Soil organic carbon fractions after 16-years of applications of fertilizers and organic manure in a Typic Rhodalfs in semi-arid tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 86:391–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9301-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhme L, Langer U, Böhme F (2005) Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:141–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan EB, Acosta-Martinez V (2017) Cover cropping frequency is the main driver of soil microbial changes during 6 years of organic vegetable production. Soil Biol Biochem 109:188–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman DC, Callaham MA, Crossley D Jr (2017) Fundamentals of soil ecology. Academic press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dick RP (1994) Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. In: Proceedings of symposium, Minneapolis, vol 1992, pp 107–124Google Scholar
  8. Fatondji D, Martius C, Zougmore R, Vlek PLG, Bielders CL, Koala S (2009) Decomposition of organic amendment and nutrient release under the zai technique in the Sahel. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 85:225–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9261-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujita K et al (2018) Nitrogen supply rate regulates microbial resource allocation for synthesis of nitrogen-acquiring enzymes. PLoS ONE 13:e0202086.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao X, Wu M, Xu R, Wang X, Pan R, Kim HJ, Liao H (2014) Root interactions in a maize/soybean intercropping system control soybean soil-borne disease, red crown rot. PLoS ONE 9:e95031.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ge GF et al (2009) Geographical and climatic differences in long-term effect of organic and inorganic amendments on soil enzymatic activities and respiration in field experimental stations of China. Ecol Complex 6:421–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geisseler D, Scow KM (2014) Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 75:54–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo JH et al (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080%5b1142:siiema%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han P, Zhang W, Wang G, Sun W, Huang Y (2016) Changes in soil organic carbon in croplands subjected to fertilizer management: a global meta-analysis. Sci Rep 6:27199.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jian S et al (2016) Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 101:32–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keiluweit M, Bougoure JJ, Nico PS, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK, Kleber M (2015) Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates. Nat Clim Change 5:588–595.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Chang SX, Tian L, Zhang Q (2018) Conservation agriculture practices increase soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in agricultural soils: a global meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 121:50–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo Y, Hui D, Zhang D (2006) Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology 87:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manna MC et al (2005) Long-term effect of fertilizer and manure application on soil organic carbon storage, soil quality and yield sustainability under sub-humid and semi-arid tropical India. Field Crops Res 93:264–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marklein AR, Houlton BZ (2012) Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 193:696–704.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03967.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDaniel MD, Tiemann LK, Grandy AS (2014) Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 24:560–570.  https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0616.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Novelli LE, Caviglia OP, Piñeiro G (2017) Increased cropping intensity improves crop residue inputs to the soil and aggregate-associated soil organic carbon stocks. Soi Tillage Res 165:128–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD, Holt RD (1999) Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80:1105–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080%5b1105:reqtma%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pittelkow CM et al (2015) When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Res 183:156–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rounsevell MDA, Annetts JE, Audsley E, Mayr T, Reginster I (2003) Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:465–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00217-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, van Wijk MT, Rufino MC, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2011) A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions. Agron Sustain Dev 31:657–673.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saha S, Prakash V, Kundu S, Kumar N, Mina BL (2008) Soil enzymatic activity as affected by long term application of farm yard manure and mineral fertilizer under a rainfed soybean–wheat system in N-W Himalaya. Eur J Soil Biol 44:309–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sinsabaugh RL et al (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tian K, Zhao Y, Xu X, Hai N, Huang B, Deng W (2015) Effects of long-term fertilization and residue management on soil organic carbon changes in paddy soils of China: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 204:40–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol Lett 11:1111–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Den Bossche A, De Bolle S, De Neve S, Hofman G (2009) Effect of tillage intensity on N mineralization of different crop residues in a temperate climate. Soil Tillage Res 103:316–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu RK, Zhao AZ, Yuan Jh, Jiang J (2012) pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars. J Soils Sediments 12:494–502.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0483-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yan D, Wang D, Yang L (2007) Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on labile organic matter fractions in a paddy soil. Biol Fertil Soils 44:93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0183-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang LJ, Li TL, Li FS, Lemcoff JH, Cohen S (2008) Fertilization regulates soil enzymatic activity and fertility dynamics in a cucumber field. Sci Hort 116:21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang T, Wan S, Kang Y, Feng H (2014) Urease activity and its relationships to soil physiochemical properties in a highly saline-sodic soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14:304–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Q, Miao F, Wang Z, Shen Y, Wang G (2017) Effects of long-term fertilization management practices on soil microbial biomass in China’s cropland: a meta-analysis. Agron J 109:1183–1195.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.09.0553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zuber SM, Villamil MB (2016) Meta-analysis approach to assess effect of tillage on microbial biomass and enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 97:176–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grassland Agri-husbandry Research CenterQingdao Agricultural UniversityQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Department of Soil and Physical SciencesLincoln UniversityLincolnNew Zealand
  3. 3.Landcare ResearchLincolnNew Zealand
  4. 4.School of Agribusiness and AgriscienceMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil ScienceUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  6. 6.Key Laboratory of East China Urban Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Institute of Agricultural Sustainable DevelopmentShandong Academy of Agricultural SciencesJinanChina

Personalised recommendations