Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Combining user involvement with innovative design to develop a radical new method for managing N fertilization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In France, a single science-based model has dominated winter wheat N fertilizer management for 40 years. Despite scientific progress, it remains challenging to minimize N losses whilst maximizing grain yield and achieving satisfactory grain protein content. A mismatch between the science-based method and its implementation has been demonstrated. We thought that involving users early in the design process would lead to explore more relevant methods regarding the diversity of N issues and implementation conditions. We used a three-step design process: (1) a diagnosis of the uses of existing methods and tools, (2) a design process combining participatory workshops, generation of new knowledge and model-based prototyping, and (3) a test of the prototype in the users’ conditions. We identified the fixing of a target yield a priori as one of the major problems with the current N fertilization method. We thus established an exploratory conceptual axis: “a fertilization method without target yield”. Design workshops led to a new method based on (1) the regular monitoring of crop N nutrition, (2) the acceptance of periods of crop N deficiency, and (3) the simulation of short-term soil N availability with a crop model. New knowledge was generated, and the Azodyn model was used to build decision rules for N applications, based on viability theory. The prototype was tested by two groups of farmers. We show that, by combining the three steps used here, it was possible to develop an innovative fertilizer method radically different from the dominant paradigm, and positively received by users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(source: authors’ insigths)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

(source: Ravier et al. 2017a)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agogué M, Arnoux F, Brown I, Hooge S (2013) Introduction à la conception innovante: éléments théoriques et pratiques de la théorie C–K, 2013. Presses des Mines-Transvalor, Paris, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin J-P (1991) Viability theory. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-8176-4910-4. Accessed 4 Dec 2015

  • Béguin P (2003) Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interact Comput 15:709–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00060-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergez JE, Colbach N, Crespo O, Garcia F, Jeuffroy MH, Justes E, Loyce C, Munier-Jolain N, Sadok W (2010) Designing crop management systems by simulation. Eur J Agron 32:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthet ETA, Barnaud C, Girard N, Labatut J, Martin G (2016) How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods. J Environ Plan Manag 59:280–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billen G, Garnier J, Benoît M, Anglade J (2013) La cascade de l’azote dans les territoires de grande culture du Nord de la France. Cah Agric 22:272–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlotti B, Mission Eau-Nitrates CORPEN (1992) Recueil des bases de préconisations de la fertilisation des cultures. Ministère de l’Environnement (Ed), Paris (France), p 136

  • Cerf M (1996) Approche cognitive de pratiques agricoles: intérêts et limites pour les agronomes. Nat Sci Soc 4(4):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerf M, Jeuffroy MH, Prost L, Meynard JM (2012) Participatory design of agricultural decision support tools: taking account of the use situations. Agron Sustain Dev 32:899–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0091-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z, Zhang F, Chen X, Dou Z, Li J (2010) In-season nitrogen management strategy for winter wheat: maximizing yields, minimizing environmental impact in an over-fertilization context. Field Crops Res 116:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmquist M, Segrestin B (2009) Sustainable development through innovative design: lessons from the KCP method experimented with an automotive firm. Int J Automot Technol Manag 9:229. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2009.026399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis C, Lieblein G, Gliessman S, Breland TA, Creamer N, Harwood R, Salomonsson L, Helenius J, Rickerl D, Salvador R, Wiedenhoeft M, Simmons S, Allen P, Altieri M, Flora C, Poincelot R (2003) Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. J Sustain Agric 22:99–118. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v22n03_10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2009) C–K design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Des 19:181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B (2009) Design theory and collective creativity: a theoretical framework to evaluate KCP process. In: International conference on engineering design, ICED’09, August 2009, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp 77–288

  • Hébert JC (1969) La fumure azotée du blé. Bull Tech d’information 244:755–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooge S, Béjean M, Arnoux F (2016) Organisation for radical innovation: the benefits of the interplay between cognitive and organisational processes in KCP workshops. Int J Innov Manag 20:1640004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616400041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeuffroy MH, Bouchard C (1999) Intensity and duration of nitrogen deficiency on wheat grain number. Crop Sci 39:1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951385x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeuffroy MH, Recous S (1999) Azodyn: a simple model simulating the date of nitrogen deficiency for decision support in wheat fertilization. Eur J Agron 10:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justes E, Mary B, Meynard J-M, Machet J-M, Thelier-Huché L (1994) Determination of a critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter wheat crops. Ann Bot 74:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1994.1133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kusunose Y, Mahmood R (2016) Imperfect forecasts and decision making in agriculture. Agric Syst 146:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson P, Hatchuel A, Weil B (2011) The interplay between creativity issues and design theories: a new perspective for design management studies? Creat Innov Manag 20(4):217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire G, Nicolardot B (1997) Maîtrise de l’azote dans les agrosystèmes. INRA (eds) Paris, 336

  • Lemaire G, van Oosterom E, Jeuffroy MH, Gastal F, Massignam A (2008) Crop species present different qualitative types of response to N deficiency during their vegetative growth. Field Crops Res 105:253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemery B (2003) Les agriculteurs dans la fabrique d’une nouvelle agriculture. Farmers in the making of a new agriculture. Sociologie du Travail 45:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limaux F, Recous S, Meynard JM, Guckert A (1999) Relationship between rate of crop growth at date of fertiliser N application and fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat. Plant Soil 214:49–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski D, Taverne M, Bolomier J, Ducarne M (2005) Comparison of risk indicators for Sclerotinia control in oilseed rape. Crop Protection 24:527–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCown RL (2001) Learning to bridge the gap between science-based decision support and the practice of farming: evolution in paradigms of model-based research and intervention from design to dialogue. Aust J Agric Res 52:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard JM, Cerf M, Guichard L, Jeuffroy MH, Makowski D (2002) Which decision support tools for the environmental management of nitrogen? Agronomie 22:817–829. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2002064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard JM, Dedieu B, Bos B (2012) Re-design and co-design of farming systems. An overview of methods and practices. In: Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (eds) Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Springer, Berlin, pp 405–429

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Ecology (2015) Arrêté du 19 décembre 2011 relatif au programme d’actions national à mettre en œuvre dans les zones vulnérables afin de réduire la pollution des eaux par les nitrates d’origine agricole. NOR: DEVL1134069A. Version du 24 juin 2015

  • Prost L, Cerf M, Jeuffroy MH (2012) Lack of consideration for end-users during the design of agronomic models. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0059-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prost L, Berthet ETA, Cerf M, Jeuffroy MH, Labatut J, Meynard JM (2016) Innovative design for agriculture in the move towards sustainability: scientific challenges. Res Eng Des. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0233-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravier (2017) Conception innovante d’une méthode de fertilization azotée: Ariculation entre diagnostic des usages, ateliers participatifs et modélisation. Thèse de doctorat, AgroParisTech, 210

  • Ravier C, Jeuffroy MH, Meynard JM (2016) Mismatch between a science-based decision tool and its use: the case of the balance-sheet method for nitrogen fertilization in France. NJAS Wagening J Life Sci 79:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravier C, Meynard JM, Cohan JP, Gate P, Jeuffroy MH (2017a) Early nitrogen deficiencies favor high yield, grain protein content and N use efficiency in wheat. Eur J Agron 89:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravier C, Quemada M, Jeuffroy MH (2017b) Use of a chlorophyll meter to assess nitrogen nutrition index during the growth cycle in winter wheat. Field Crop Res 214:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recous S, Machet JM (1999) Short-term immobilisation and crop uptake of fertiliser nitrogen applied to winter wheat: effect of date of application in spring. Plant Soil 206:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004377006602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossing WAH, Meynard JM, van Ittersum MK (1997) Model-based explorations to support development of sustainable farming systems: cases studies from France and the Netherlands. Eur J Agron 7:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier R, Oates LG, Jackson RD (2015) Management flexibility of a grassland agroecosystem: a modeling approach based on viability theory. Agric Syst 139:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA (2008) In: Discussion of Schröder JJ, Neeteson, JJ, 2008—this issue. Nutrient management regulations in The Netherlands (with Discussion). Geoderma 144: 418–425. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.011

  • Spiertz JHJ (2010) Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Grinsven HJM, ten Berge HFM, Dalgaard T, Fraters B, Durand P, Hart A, Hofman G, Jacobsen BH, Lalor STJ, Lesschen JP, Osterburg B, Richards KG, Techen A-K, Vertès F, Webb J, Willems WJ (2012) Management, regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under the Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study. Biogeosciences 9:5143–5160. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5143-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the Initiative INRA-AgroParisTech for Design in Agrifood Systems (IDEAS). We thank the farmers and advisors who participated in the diagnosis of uses and prototype testing. We thank the experts (Marc Bardinal, Michel Bonnefoy, Philippe Braun, Pierre Cellier, Marianne Cerf, Olivier Deudon, Laurence Guichard, Eric Masson, Sylvie Recous) who participated, with the authors of this paper, in the workshops, and made major contributions to the emergence of the new concept. We thank Marc Lambert from Yara for lending us chlorophyll meters. We thank Arvalis-Institut-du-végétal, and ADEME (Agence de l’Environment et de la Maîtrise de l’Energie) for funding this study. This study was part of the REACCTIF project. We thank Julie Sappa from Alex Edelman & Associates for reviewing the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UMR211 Agronomie, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, BP 01, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France

    Clémence Ravier & Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy

  2. Arvalis-Institut-du-Végétal, Station Expérimentale de la Jaillière, 44370, La Chapelle Saint-Sauveur, France

    Clémence Ravier & Jean-Pierre Cohan

  3. Arvalis-Institut-du-Végétal, 3 Rue Joseph & Marie Hackin, 75116, Paris, France

    Philippe Gate

  4. UMR1048 SAD-APT, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Campus de Grignon, Batiment EGER, BP 01, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France

    Jean-Marc Meynard

Authors
  1. Clémence Ravier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philippe Gate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Pierre Cohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jean-Marc Meynard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Meynard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravier, C., Jeuffroy, MH., Gate, P. et al. Combining user involvement with innovative design to develop a radical new method for managing N fertilization. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 110, 117–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9891-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9891-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation