Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 211–230 | Cite as

Irrigation and nitrogen managements affect nitrogen leaching and root yield of sugar beet

  • Mehdi Barzegari
  • Ali Reza Sepaskhah
  • Seyed Hamid Ahmadi
Original Article

Abstract

Irrigation water and nitrogen (N) are the limiting factors for crop production in arid and semi-arid areas. However, excess irrigation and N application rate is a source of groundwater contamination. Partial root drying irrigation (PRD) is the water-saving technique and would perform as a controlling measure of groundwater N contamination as it reduces irrigation amount. Sugar beet is an industrial crop that is widely grown in arid and semi-arid area where N and water are highly required for high sugar beet yield production. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the interaction effect of ordinary furrow irrigation (OFI), and PRD irrigation as variable alternate furrow irrigation (VAFI) and fixed alternate furrow irrigation (FAFI) with different N application rates (0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1) on sugar beet root and sugar yield, yield quality, drainage water, N leaching, N uptake, and N efficiency indices. Results indicated that the alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) used 24% less irrigation water compared with the OFI in the study region, whereas its sugar yield was reduced just by 9%. However, it resulted in higher water productivity by 12 and 17% for root and sugar yields, respectively. In different N application rates nitrate leaching reduced by 46 and 52% in the VAFI and FAFI irrigation treatments compared with the OFI, respectively. Physiologic nitrogen efficiency enhanced in VAFI with 160 kg N ha−1 that implied higher production of uptake N in plants. Therefore, considering the nitrogen use economics and environmental impacts, the VAFI and 160 kg N ha−1 were preferred to the other irrigation treatments and N application rates in the study region. Higher nitrogen saving occurred because of less leaching and higher soil residual in the AFI treatment compared with the OFI. Furthermore, leaf level stress sensitivity index indicated that VAFI increased the sugar beet resistance to water stress. Overall, in order to avoid N losses in sugar beet production, the amount of N fertilizer should be reduced in proportion to the amount of soil water available under VAFI water-saving irrigation.

Keywords

Variable alternative furrow irrigation Fixed alternative furrow irrigation Deficit irrigation Partial root drying irrigation Nitrogen leaching Nitrogen efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by Grant No. 96-GR-AGR-42 of Shiraz University Research Council, Drought Research Center, Center of Excellence on Farm Water Management and Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

References

  1. Ahmadi SH, Andersen MN, Plauborg F, Poulsen RT, Jensen CR, Sepaskhah AR, Hansen S (2010a) Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: gas exchange and xylem [ABA]. Agric Water Manage 97:1486–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadi SH, Andersen MN, Plauborg F, Poulsen RT, Jensen CR, Sepaskhah AR, Hansen S (2010b) Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: yield and water productivity. Agric Water Manag 97:1923–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadi SH, Andersen MN, Laerke PE, Plauborg F, Sepaskhah AR, Jensen CR, Hansen S (2011) Interaction effect of different irrigation strategies and soil textures on the nitrogen uptake of field grown potatoes. Int J Plant Prod 5(3):263–274Google Scholar
  4. Ahmadi SH, Agharezaei M, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Sepaskhah AR (2014) Effects of dynamic and static deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation strategies on yield, tube size distribution, and water productivity of two field grown potato cultivars. Agric Water Manag 134:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmadi SH, Agharezaee M, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Sepaskhah AR (2016) Water-saving irrigation strategies affect tuber water relations and nitrogen content of potatoes. Int J Plant Prod 10:275–288Google Scholar
  6. Allen R, Pereira L, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain 56:116–137Google Scholar
  7. Asadi ME, Clemente RS, Gupta AD, Loof R, Hansen GK (2002) Impacts of feritigation via sprinkler irrigation on nitrate leaching and corn yield in an acid-sulphate soil in Thailand. Agric Water Manag 52:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azizian A, Sepaskhah AR (2014) Response to water, salinity and nitrogen levels: agronomic behavior. Int J Plant Prod 8(1):107–130Google Scholar
  9. Barton L, Colmer TD (2006) Irrigation and fertilizer strategies for minimizing nitrogen leaching from turfgrass. Agric Water Manag 80:160–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilbao M, Martínez JJ, Delgado A (2004) Evaluation of soil nitrate as a predictor of nitrogen requirement for sugar beet grown in mediterranean climate. Agron J 96:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borg H, Grimes DW (1986) Depth development of roots with time: an empirical description. Trans ASAE 29:194–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen: total, In: Page AL et al. (Ed.). Methods of soil analysis: part 2, 2nd ed., Agronomy monograph 9, ASA, ASSA, Madison, pp. 595–641Google Scholar
  13. Broadley MR, Escobar-Gutiérrez AJ, Burns A, Burns IG (2001) Nitrogen-limited growth of lettuce is associated with lower stomatal conductance. New Phyto.152:L97–106Google Scholar
  14. Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1961) Methods of analysis for soil, plants and water. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Oakland, pp 1–309Google Scholar
  15. Dodd IC, Egea G, Davies WJ (2008) Abscisic acid signalling when soil moisture is heterogeneous: decreased photoperiod sap flow from drying roots limits abscisic acid export to the shoots. Plant Cell Environ 31:1263–1274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Du T, Kang SZ, Zhang JH, Li F (2008) Water use and yield responses of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China. Irrig Sci 26:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faberio C, de Santa Martin, Olalla F, Lopez R, Dominguez A (2003) Production and quality of the sugar beet cultivated under controlled deficit irrigation conditions in a semi-arid climate. Agric Water Manag 62:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gencoglan C, Altunbey H, Gencoglan S (2006) Response of green bean (P-vulgaris L.) to subsurface drip irrigation and partial root zone drying irrigation. Agric Water Manag 84:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gheysari MS, Mirlatifi M, Bannayan M, Homaee M, Hoogenboom G (2009) Interaction of water and nitrogen on Maize for silage. Agric Water Manage 96:809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hepworth C, Doheny-Adams T, Cameron DD, Gray JE (2015) Manipulating stomatal density enhances drought tolerance without deleterious effect on nutrient uptake. New Phyto 208:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jalali M (2005) Nitrates leaching from agricultural land in Hamadan, western Iran. Agric Ecosys Environ 110:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen, ME. 1973. Consumptive use of water and irrigation water requirements. ASCE, p 215Google Scholar
  23. Jovanovic Z, Stikic R, Vucelic-Radovic B, Paukovic M, Brocic Z, Matovic G, Rovcanin S, Mojevic M (2010) Partial root-zone drying increases WUE, N and antioxidant content in field potatoes. Eur J Agron 33:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kang SZ, Zhang JH (2004) Controlled alternate partial root-zone drying irrigation: its physiological consequence and impact on water use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55:2437–2446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang S, Liang Z, Pan Y, Shi P, Zhang J (2000a) Alternate furrow irrigation for maize production in an arid area. Agric Water Manag 45:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang SZ, Shi P, Pan YH, Liang ZS, Hu XT, Zhang J (2000b) Soil water distribution, uniformity and water-use efficiency under alternate furrow irrigation in arid areas. Irrig Sci 19:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirda C, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ugler AC, Yazici A, Cetin M, Derici MR (2005) Grain yield response and N-fertilizer recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crop Res 93:132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kiymaz S, Ertek A (2015) Yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) at different water and nitrogen levels under the climatic conditions of Kırsehir, Turkey. Agric Water Manag 158:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumbhar AM, Buriro UA, Oad FC, Chachar QI (2007) Yield parameters and N-uptake of wheat under different fertility levels in legume rotation. J Agric Technol 3(2):323–333Google Scholar
  30. Lamb TA, Moraghan JT (1993) Comparison of foliar and preplant applied nitrogen fertilizer for sugar beet. Agron J 85:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambers Hans, Chapin FS III, Pons TL (2008) Plant Physiological Ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawlor DW (2001) Photosynthesis. BIOS scientific publishers, Oxford, p 386Google Scholar
  33. Liu F, Shahnazari A, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2006) Physiological response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to partial root zone drying: ABA signaling, leaf gas exchange, and water use efficiency. J Exp Bot 57:3727–3735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu F, Song R, Zhang X, Shahnazari A, Andersen MN, Plauborg F, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2008) Measurement and modeling of ABA signaling in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during partial root-zone drying. Environ Exp Bot 63:385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu C, Rubaek GH, Liu F, Andersen MN (2015) Effect of partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation on nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in potato. Agric Water Manage 159:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malnou CS, Jaggard KW, Sparkes DL (2008) Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer. Eur J Agron 28:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parvizi H, Sepaskhah AR, Ahmadi SH (2014) Effect of drip irrigation and fertilizer regimes treatments on fruit yields and water productivity of a pomegranate (Punica granatum (L.) cv. Rabab) orchard. Agric Water Manag 146:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pirmoradian N, Sepaskhah AR, Maftoun M (2004) Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on nitrogen efficiency and grain protein of rice. Agronomie 24(9–11):143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saeed H, Grove IG, Kettlewell PS, Hall NW (2008) Potential of partial root zone drying as an alternative irrigation technique for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Ann Appl Bot 152:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sepaskhah AR, Kamgar-Haghighi AA (1997) Water use and yields of sugar beet grown under every-other-furrow irrigation with different irrigation intervals. Agric Water Manag 34:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sepaskhah AR, Hosseini SN (2008) Effect of alternate furrow irrigation and nitrogen application rate on yield and water-and nitrogen- use efficiency of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Prod Sci 11(2):250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sepaskhah AR, Ahmadi SH (2010) A review on partial root-zone drying irrigation. Int J Plant Prod 4(4):241–258Google Scholar
  43. Sepaskhah AR, Tafteh A (2012) Yield and nitrogen leaching in rapeseed field under different nitrogen rates and water saving irrigation. Agric Water Manag 112:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sezen SM, Yazar A, Tekin S (2011) Effects of partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation on yield and oil quality of sunflower in a Mediterranean environment. Irrig Drain 60:499–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shahnazari A, Liu F, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2007) Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Res 100:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shahnazari A, Ahmadi SH, Laerke PE, Liu F, Plauborg F, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR, Andersen MN (2008) Nitrogen dynamics in the soil-plant system under deficit and partial root-zone drying irrigation strategies in potatoes. Eur J Agron 28:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skinner RJ, Hanson JD, Benjamin JG (1999) Nitrogen uptake and partitioning under alternate- and every- furrow irrigation. Plant Soil 210:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun Y, Yan F, Liu F (2013) Drying/rewetting cycles of the soil under alternate partial root-zone drying irrigation reduce carbon and nitrogen retention in the soil–plant systems of potato. Agric Water Manag 128:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szmigiel A, Kołodziejczyk M, Oleksy A, Kulig B (2016) Efficiency of nitrogen fertilization in spring wheat. Int J Plant Prod 10(4):447–456Google Scholar
  50. Tafteh A, Sepaskhah AR (2012) Yield and nitrogen leaching in maize field under different nitrogen rates and partial root drying irrigation. Int J Plant Prod 6(1):93–114Google Scholar
  51. Tang L, Li Y, Zhang J (2005) Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial root zone irrigation. Field Crops Res 94:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tarkalson DD, Payero JO, Ensley SM, Shapiro CA (2006) Nitrate accumulation and movement under deficit irrigation in soil receiving cattle manure and commercial fertilizer. Agric Water Manag 85:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Topak R, Acar B, Uyanoz R, Ceyhan E (2016) Performance of partial root-zone drip irrigation for sugar beet production in a semi-arid area. Agric Water Manag 176:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsailtas JT, Maslaris N (2013) Nitrogen effects on yield, quality and K/Na selectivity of sugar beets grown on clays under semi-arid irrigated conditions. Int J Plant Prod 7(3):355–371Google Scholar
  55. Varvel GE, Francis JS, Schepers DD (1997) Ability for in-season correction of nitrogen deficiency in corn using chlorophyll meters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang H, Liu F, Andersen MN, Jensen CR (2009) Comparative effects of partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation on nitrogen uptake in potatoes. Irrig Sci 27:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang YS, Liu FL, Andersen MN, Jensen CR (2010) Improved plant nitrogen nutrition contributes to higher water use efficiency in tomatoes under alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Funct Plant Biol 37:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang Z, Liu F, Kang S, Jensen JR (2012) Alternate partial root-zone drying irrigation improves nitrogen nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) leaves. Environ Exp Bot 75:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Y, Liu F, Jensen LS, de Neergaard A, Jensen CR (2013) Alternate partial root-zone irrigation improves fertilizer-N use efficiency in tomatoes. Irrig Sci 31:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zand-Parsa Sh, Sepaskkhah AR, Ronaghi A (2006) Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize. Agric Water Manage 81(3):227–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zapata F, van Cleemput O (1986) Recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer by sugar beet-spring wheat and winter rye-sugar beet cropping sequences. Fert Res 8:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irrigation Department, Faculty of AgricultureShiraz UniversityShirazIslamic Republic of Iran
  2. 2.Drought Research CenterShiraz UniversityShirazIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations