Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp 275–290 | Cite as

Maize yield effects of conservation agriculture based maize–legume cropping systems in contrasting agro-ecologies of Malawi and Mozambique

  • Isaiah NyagumboEmail author
  • Siyabusa Mkuhlani
  • Charity Pisa
  • Donwell Kamalongo
  • Domingos Dias
  • Mulugetta Mekuria
Original Article


Sustainable intensification cropping systems involving improved maize and legume seeds and conservation agriculture (CA) are potential avenues towards improved productivity. This study evaluated CA based cropping systems effects on maize yields with respect to herbicide use, crop establishment techniques and legume rotations in four contrasting agro-ecologies of Malawi and Mozambique from 2010/11 to 2013/14. No significant (p > 0.05) yield differences, at 4100 versus 3900 kg ha−1 were observed in Malawi when CA was implemented with and without herbicides respectively, suggesting herbicides were not a precondition for CA’s success. CA basins depressed maize yields by 3 % in north-western Mozambique and also offered no advantages in Malawi’s lowland districts (Ntcheu and Salima). In contrast, significant yield gains (p < 0.05) emerged from dry Balaka (<600 mm year−1) with mean yields of 2400 from the CA basins compared to 1800 kg ha−1 from farmer practices, an effect also confirmed by the yield stability analysis showing CA basins superiority in unfavourable rainfall environments. Thus CA basins performance was site dependent with no benefits on waterlogged soils or high rainfall conditions where direct seeded dibble stick or jab planting provided a better crop establishment option. Across all agro-ecologies, soyabeans, cowpea and groundnuts rotation systems, significantly increased maize yield, amounting to 20, 38 and 54 % respectively, except for the maize–common bean rotations in north-western Mozambique, which failed to offer any yield advantages. Probabilities of achieving higher CA yield ranged from 58 to 71 %. The study suggests CA based cropping systems offer an opportunity for intensifying maize production in the region.


Crop rotation Intercropping Herbicide CA basins Direct seeding Legumes Crop establishment 



Acknowledgments go to the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) for funding this study, the departments of agricultural research and extension services of both Malawi and Mozambique for providing facilities and human resources that supported implementation of this study.

Supplementary material

10705_2015_9733_MOESM1_ESM.doc (882 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 882 kb)


  1. Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Myaka FA, Sakala WD, Odgaard R, Vesterager JM, Høgh-Jensen H (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in farmer-managed intercrops of maize–pigeonpea in semi-arid southern and eastern Africa. Plant Soil 295:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anazodo UGN, Onwualu AP, Watts KC (1991) Evaluation of alternative tillage systems in the absence of herbicides for maize production in a savannah loamy sand. Agric Eng Res 49:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggelaar C, Lal R, Wiebe K, Breneman V (2004) The global impact of soil erosion on productivity. Adv Agron 81:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardina J, Herms DJ, Doohan CP (2002) Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Sci 50:448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson JD (2008) Intercropping with maize in sub-arid regions. In: Community planning and analysis. Technical Brief, 16 April 2008, 6 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbeels M, Sakyi RK, Kühne RF, Whitbread A (2014) Meta-analysis of crop responses to conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Copenhagen. doi:CCAFS Report No.12Google Scholar
  7. Dickey EC, Fenster CR, Laflen JM, Mickelson RH (1983) Effects of tillage on soil erosion in a wheat-fallow rotation. Trans ASAE 26:814–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixon J, Gulliver A, Gibbon D (2001) Farming systems and poverty: improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world. FAO and World Bank, Rome and WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Elwell HA, Stocking M (1988) Loss of soil nutrients by sheet erosion is a major hidden farming cost. Zimb Sci News 22:79–82Google Scholar
  10. Enfors E, Barron J, Makurira H, Rockström J, Tumbo S (2011) Yield and soil system changes from conservation tillage in dryland farming: a case study from north eastern Tanzania. Agric Water Manag 98:1687–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finlay K, Wilkinson G (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garnett T, Appleby MC, Balmford A, Bateman J, Benton TG, Bloomer P, Burlingame B, Dawkins M, Dolan L, Fraser D, Herrero M, Hoffmann I, Smith P, Thornton PK, Toulmin C, Vermeulen SJ, Godfray HCJ (2013) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Agric Sci 341:333–334Google Scholar
  13. Gatere L, Lehmann J, DeGloria S, Hobbs P, Delve R, Travis A (2013) One size does not fit all: conservation farming success in Africa more dependent on management than on location. Agric Ecosyst Environ 179:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giller KE (2001) Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems, 2nd ed. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering University of Zimbabwe, Harare Zimbabwe; Department of Plant Sciences Plant Production Systems Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands; CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK, 138 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Giller KE, Witter PE, Tittonell P, Corbeels M (2009) Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crops Res 114:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giller KE, Tittonell P, Rufino MC, van Wijk MT, Zingore S, Mapfumo P, Adjei-Nsiah S, Herrero M, Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Rowe EC, Baijukya F, Mwijage A, Smith J, Yeboah E, van der Burg WJ, Sanogo OM, Misiko M, de Ridder N, Karanja S, Kaizzi C, K’ungu J, Mwale M, Nwaga D, Pacini C, Vanlauwe B (2011) Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agric Syst 104:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. An international. International Rice Research Institute, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Govaerts B, Mezzalama M, Sayre KD, Crossa J, Nicol JM, Deckers J (2006) Long-term consequences of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on maize/wheat root rot and nematode populations in subtropical highlands. Appl Soil Ecol 32:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris D, Orr A (2014) Is rainfed agriculture really a pathway from poverty? Agric Syst 123:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang G, Chai Q, Feng F, Yu A (2012) Effects of different tillage systems on soil properties, root growth, grain yield, and water use efficiency of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in arid northwest China. J Integr Agric 11:1286–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones A, Breuning-Madsen H, Brossard M, Dampha A, Deckers J, Dewitte O, Gallali T, Hallett S, Jones R, Kilasara M, Le Roux P, Micheli E, Montanarella L, Spaargaren O, Thiombiano L, Van Ranst E, Yemefack MRZ (2013) Soil atlas of Africa. European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. doi: 10.2788/52319
  22. Kapusta G, Krausz RF, Matthews JL (1996) Corn yield is equal in conventional, reduced, and no tillage after 20 years. Agron J 88:812–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kassam A, Friedrich T, Shaxson F, Pretty J (2009) The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. Int J Agric Sustain 7:292–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lotter D (2014) Facing food insecurity in Africa: why, after 30 years of work in organic agriculture, I am promoting the use of synthetic fertilizers and herbicides in small-scale staple crop production. Agric Hum Values 10:100. doi: 10.1007/s10460-014-9547-x Google Scholar
  25. Maltas A, Corbeels M, Scopel E, Wery J, Macena da Silva FA (2009) Cover crop and nitrogen effects on maize productivity in no-tillage systems of the Brazilian cerrados. Agron J 101:1036–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maria RM, Yost R (2006) A survey of soil fertility status of four agro-ecological zones of Mozambique. Soil Sci 171:902–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muoni T, Rusinamhodzi L, Thierfelder C (2013) Weed control in conservation agriculture systems of Zimbabwe: identifying economical best strategies. Crop Prot 53:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mupangwa W, Twomlow S, Hove L, Walker S, Africa S (2007) Effect of mulching and minimum tillage on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water content of clayey and sandy soils. Phys Chem Earth 32:1127–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mupangwa W, Twomlow S, Walker S (2012) Reduced tillage, mulching and rotational effects on maize (Zea mays L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Walp) L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. (Moench)) yields under semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Res 132:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ngwira AM, Thierfelder C, Lambert DM (2013) Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. Renew Agric Food Syst 28:350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ngwira A, Johnsen FH, Aune JB, Mekuria M, Thierfelder C (2014a) Adoption and extent of conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi. J Soil Water Conserv 69:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ngwira AR, Aune JB, Thierfelder C (2014b) DSSAT modelling of conservation agriculture maize response to climate change in Malawi. Soil Tillage Res 143:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nyagumbo I, Rurinda J (2012) An appraisal of policies and institutional frameworks impacting on smallholder agricultural water management in Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 47–48:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peoples MB, Brockwell J, Herridge DF, Rochester IJ, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM, Dakora FD, Bhattarai S, Maskey SL, Sampet C, Rerkasem B, Khan DF, Jensen ES, Asia S, Asia S (2009) The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis 48:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piepho H (1998) Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems: a review. J Agron Crop Sci 180:193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy RN, Misra RV, Lesschen JP, Smaling EM (2003) Assessment of soil nutrient balance: approaches and methodologies. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin, RomeGoogle Scholar
  37. Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2012) Maize–grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Res 136:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sosnoskie LM, Herms CP, Cardina J (2006) Weed seedbank community composition n a 35-yr-old tillage and rotation experiment. Weed Sci 54:263–273Google Scholar
  39. Steckel LE, Sprague CL, Stoller EW, Wax LM, Simmons FW (2007) Tillage, cropping system, and soil depth effects on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) seed-bank persistence. Weed Sci 55:235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thierfelder C, Wall PC (2009) Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res 105:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thierfelder C, Wall PC (2010) Rotation in conservation agriculture systems of Zambia: effects on soil quality and water relations. Exp Agric 46:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thierfelder C, Cheesman S, Rusinamhodzi L (2013) Benefits and challenges of crop rotations in maize-based conservation agriculture (CA) cropping systems of southern Africa. Int J Agric Sustain 11:108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thierfelder C, Rusinamhodzi L, Ngwira AM, Mupangwa WT, Nyagumbo I, Kassie GT, Cairns JE (2014) Conservation agriculture in southern Africa: advances in knowledge. Renew Agric Food Syst 23:224–246Google Scholar
  44. Thierfelder C, Matemba-Mutasa R, Rusinamhodzi L (2015) Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa. Soil Tillage Res 146:230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valbuena D, Erenstein O, Tui SH-K, Abdoulaye T, Claessens L, Duncan AJ, Gerard B, Rufino MC, Teufel N, van Rooyen AA, van Wijk MT (2012) Conservation agriculture in mixed crop–livestock systems: scoping crop residue trade-offs in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Field Crops Res 132:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Rensburg HGJ (2009) Soil chemical and nutrient uptake dynamics of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by neutralization and re-acidification after liming. University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  47. Vogel H (1994) Weeds in single-crop conservation farming in Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res 31:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. VSN (2011) GenStat for Windows 14th ed. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  49. Waddington SR, Murwira HK, Kumwenda JDT, Hikwa D, Tagwira F, (2008) Soil fertility research for maize-based farming systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. In: Proceedings of the soil fertility network results and planning workshop, 07 Jul 97 to 11 Jul 97 Mutare, Zimbabwe. CIMMYT, Harare, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagstaff P, Harty M (2010) The impact of conservation agriculture on food security in three low veldt districts of Zimbabwe. Trócaire Dev Rev 2010:67–84Google Scholar
  51. Wall P (2007) Tailoring conservation agriculture to the needs of small farmers indeveloping countries: an analysis of issues. J Crop Improv 19:137–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wall PC (2009) Strategies to overcome the competition for crop residues in Southern Africa. In: 4th world congress of conservation agriculture (WCCA): innovations for improving efficiency, equity and environment. 4–7 Feb 2009, New Delhi, India, pp 65–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaiah Nyagumbo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siyabusa Mkuhlani
    • 1
  • Charity Pisa
    • 4
  • Donwell Kamalongo
    • 2
  • Domingos Dias
    • 3
  • Mulugetta Mekuria
    • 1
  1. 1.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT)Mt. Pleasant, HarareZimbabwe
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Research Services (DARS)Chitedze Research StationLilongweMalawi
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique (IIAM), Estação Agrária de SussundengaChimoioMoçambique
  4. 4.Marondera College of Agricultural Science and Technology (UZMCAST), University of ZimbabweMaronderaZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations