Skip to main content

Farm typologies, soil fertility variability and nutrient management in smallholder farming in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Farm typologies are a useful tool to assist in unpacking and understanding the wide diversity among smallholder farms to improve targeting of crop production intensification strategies. Sustainable crop production intensification will require the development of an array of nutrient management strategies tailored to farm-specific conditions, rather than blanket recommendations across diverse farms. This study reviewed key literature on smallholder farm typologies focusing on three countries (Kenya, Malawi and Zimbabwe), to gain insights on opportunities for crop production intensification, and the importance of developing farm-specific nutrient management practices. Investigations on farm typologies have done well in highlighting the fundamental differences between farm categories, with 3–5 typologies often adequate to represent the wide differences in resource endowment. Resource-endowed farmers have ready access to large quantities of manure and mineral fertilizers, which contribute to higher soil fertility and crop productivity on their farms. Resource-constrained households use little or no manure and mineral fertilizers, and have limited capacity to invest in labour-demanding soil fertility management technologies. These farmers often have to rely on off-farm opportunities for income that are largely limited to selling unskilled labour to their resource-endowed neighbors. The variability in management practices by farmers has resulted in three main soil fertility classes that can be used for targeting soil fertility management technologies, characterized by potential response to fertilizer application as: (1) low-responsive fertile fields that receive large additions of manure and fertilizer; (2) high-responsive infertile fields that receive moderate nutrient applications; (3) poorly responsive degraded soils cultivated for many years with little or no nutrient additions. The main conclusions drawn from the review are: (1) resource constrained farmers constitute the widest band across the three countries, with many of the farmers far below the threshold for sustainable maize production intensification and lacking capacity to invest in improved seed and fertilizer, (2) farm sizes and livestock ownership were key determinants for both farmer wealth status and farm productivity, and (3) soil organic carbon and available P were good indicators for predicting previous land management, that is also invariably linked to farmer resource endowment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Abuja Fertilizer Summit (2006) Abuja declaration on fertilizer for African Green Revolution. African Union Special Summit of the Heads of State and Government, Abuja

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benson T, Kaphuka J, Kanyanda S, Chinula R (2002) Malawi—an atlas of social statistics. International Food Policy Research Institute, National Statistical Office, Washington, DC, Zomba

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers R, Conway G (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS discussion paper no. 296. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK, pp 7–8

  4. Crowley EL, Carter SE (2000) Agrarian change and the changing relationships between toil and soil in Maragoli, Western Kenya (1900–1994). Hum Ecol 28:383–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delve RJ, Huising JE, Bagenze P (2007) Target area identification using a GIS approach for the introduction of legume cover crops for soil productivity improvement: a case study eastern Uganda. Afr J Agric Res 10:512–520

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorward AR, Chirwa E (2011) The Malawi Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme: 2005–6 to 2008–9. Int J Agric Sustain 9:232–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feller C, Beare MH (1997) Physical control of soil organic matter dynamics in the tropics. Geoderma 79:69–116

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giller KE, Rowe EC, de Ridder N, van Keulen H (2006) Resource use dynamics and interactions in the tropics: scaling up in space and time. Agric Syst 88:8–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giller KE, Tittonell P, Rufino MC, Wijk MT, Zingore S, Mapfumo P, Adjei-Nsiah S, Herrero M, Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Rowe EC, Baijukya F, Mwijage A, Smith J, Yeboah E, Burg WJvd, Sanogo OM, Misiko M, Ridder ND, Karanja S, Kaizzi C, K’ungu J, Mwale M, Nwaga D, Pacini C, Vanlauwe (2011) Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agric Syst 104:191–203

  10. Jansen J, Wortmann CS, Stockton MC, Kaizzi KC (2013) Maximizing net returns to financially constrained fertilizer use. Agron J 105:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamanga BCG (2011) Poor people and poor fields? Integrating legumes for smallholder soil fertility management in Chisepo, central Malawi. PhD thesis, Research School for Resource Studies for Development, Wageningen University

  12. Kamanga BCG, Waddington SR, Robertson M, Giller KE (2009) Risk analysis in maize-legume cropping systems with smallholder farmer resource groups in central Malawi. Exp Agric 46:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mango NAR (1999) Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Siaya District, Kenya. Managing African soils no. 7, 28 p

  14. Masvaya EN, Nyamangara J, Nyawasha RW, Zingore S, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2010) Effect of farmer management strategies on spatial variability of soil fertility and crop nutrient uptake in contrasting agro-ecological zones in Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 88:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mtambanengwe F, Mapfumo P (2005) Organic matter management as an underlying cause for soil fertility gradients on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 73:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Statistical Office (2008) Malawi in figures. http://www.nso.malawi.net

  17. National Statistical Office Malawi Government (2008) Enhancing agricultural input use efficiency in Malawi. A research report of the National Subsidy Programme Technical Support Workshop in Lilongwe, 15–16 April 2008. Department of Planning, Ministry of Agriculture, Lilongwe

  18. Orr A, Jere P (1999) Identifying smallholder target groups for IPM in Southern Malawi. Int J Pest Manag 45:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pampolino MF, Witt C, Pasuquin JM, Johnston A, Fisher MJ (2012) Development approach and evaluation of the Nutrient Expert software for nutrient management in cereal crops. Comput Electron Agric 88:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowe EC, van Wijk MT, de Ridder N, Giller KE (2006) Nutrient allocation strategies across a simplified heterogeneous African smallholder farm. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheahan M, Black R, Jayne TS (2013) Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for input intensification strategies and research. Food Policy 41:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shepherd KD, Soule MJ (1998) Soil fertility management in west Kenya: dynamic simulation of productivity, profitability and sustainability at different resource endowment levels. Agric Ecosyst Environ 71:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2007) Infrared spectroscopy—enabling an evidence based diagnostic surveillance approach to agricultural and environmental management in developing countries. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 15:1–19

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smaling EMA, Braun AR (1996) Soil fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa: new dimensions, new challenges. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 7:365–386

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smaling EMA, Nandwa SM, Janssen BH (1997) Soil fertility in Africa is at stake. In: Buresh RJ, Sanchez PA (eds) Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, pp 47–61

    Google Scholar 

  27. Snapp SS (1998) Soil nutrient status of smallholder farms in Malawi. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:2571–2588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Snapp SS, Benson T (1995) GIS to develop area-specific fertilizer recommendations in Malawi: soil resources, yield potential and decision trees. Agronomy Abstracts 301

  29. Snapp SS, Blackie MJ, Donovan C (2003) Realigning research and extension to focus on farmers’ constraints and opportunities. Food Policy 28:349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Swift MJ, Frost PGH, Campbell BM, Hatton JC, Wilson KB (1989) Nitrogen cycling in farming systems derived from savanna. In: Clarholm M, Bergstrom L (eds) Ecology of arable land. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Leffelaar PA, Rowe EC, Giller KE (2005) Exploring diversity in soil fertility management of smallholder farms in western Kenya I. Heterogeneity at region and farm scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Corbeels M, Giller KE (2008) Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya. Plant Soil 313:19–37

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tittonell P, Muriuki A, Shepherd KD, Mugendi D, Kaizzi KC, Okeyo J, Verchot L, Coe R, Vanlauwe B (2010) The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa—a typology of smallholder farms. Agric Syst 103:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vanlauwe B, Tittonell P, Mukalama J (2006) Within-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertiliser application in western Kenya. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 76:171–182

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zingore S, Murwira HK, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2007) Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:112–126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zingore S, Tittonell P, Corbeels M, van Wijk MT, Giller KE (2011) Managing soil fertility diversity to enhance resource use efficiencies in smallholder farming systems: a case from Murewa District, Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 90:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This review was done through a grant from The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) to the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), as part of Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)’s MAIZE research program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shamie Zingore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chikowo, R., Zingore, S., Snapp, S. et al. Farm typologies, soil fertility variability and nutrient management in smallholder farming in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 100, 1–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9632-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Farm types
  • Nutrient management
  • Soil fertility variability
  • Maize