Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 427–438 | Cite as

Influence of topography and land management on soil nutrients variability in Northeast China

  • Shaoliang Zhang
  • Xingyi ZhangEmail author
  • Ted Huffman
  • Xiaobing Liu
  • Jingyi Yang
Original Article

Abstract

It is well recognized that soil nutrient content varies across the landscape, but the nature and degree of that variability with respect to landscape position is still poorly understood and documented. Slope steepness and aspect, climate and land management are known to affect soil nutrient distribution in a field, but the relative and cumulative strengths of these effects are less well investigated. Four hundred and thirty-five topsoil samples collected from a typical Mollisol under intensive crop management in Northeast China were used to analyze the influence of landscape position, climate and land management on the spatial variability of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP). Both geo-statistics and traditional statistics were used to analyze the data, and significant spatial variability was found for SOM (22.5–86.6 g kg−1), TN (0.98–4.26 g kg−1) and TP (0.26–1.80 g kg−1). The distribution of all 3 nutrients was found to be influenced by human activity and by landscape. When both slope degree and slope aspect were considered, the results differed from when only aspect or steepness was considered independently. In a northern aspect, SOM and TN were significantly higher on slopes of 0–2% than on steeper slopes, in a south-eastern aspect they were significantly higher on slopes of 0–2, 2–3 and 3–4% than on slopes >4% and in a south-western aspect those nutrients on slopes of 2–4% were significantly higher than on slopes of >5%. Cross-slope tillage effectively increased SOM, TN and TP by 33.8, 23.3 and 22.4%, respectively compared to down-slope tillage, indicating the potential for adoption of a nutrient-retaining management practice in the Mollisol region of northeast China.

Keywords

Landscape Soil organic matter Total nitrogen Total phosphorus Land use 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the Project of Heilongjiang Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and National High-tech R&D National Natural Science Foundation Program of China for partial support of this research, under grant numbers Jc200718 and 2008AA10z212.

References

  1. Agassi M, Morin J, Shainberg I (1990) Slope, aspect, and phosphogypsum effects on runoff and erosion. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1102–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DW (1987) Pedogenesis in the grasslands and adjacent forests of the Great Plains. Adv Soil Sci 7:53–93Google Scholar
  3. Atreya KS, Sharma RM, Bajracharya NP (2008) Developing a sustainable agro-system for central Nepal using reduced tillage and straw mulching. J Environ Manage 88:547–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balasundram SK, Robert PC, Mulla DJ, Allan DL (2006) Relationship between oil palm yield and soil fertility as affected by topography in an Indonesian plantation. Soil Plant Anal 37:1321–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton AP, Fullen MA, Mitchell DJ (2004) Effects of soil conservation measures on erosion rates and crop productivity on subtropical Ultisols in Yunnan province, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:343–357Google Scholar
  6. Bottcher AB, Monke EJ, Huggins LF (1981) Nutrient and sediment loadings from a subsurface drainage system. Trans ASAE 24(5):1221–1226Google Scholar
  7. Brady NC, Weil RR (2000) Nature and properties of soils. Macmillan publishing company, New York, pp 392–393Google Scholar
  8. Buhler DD, Randall GW, Koskinen WC, Wyse DL (1993) Atrazine and alachlor losses from subsurface tile drainage of a clay loam soil. J Environ Qual 22:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrough PA (1993) Soil variability: a late 20th century view. Soils Fertilizers 56:529–562Google Scholar
  10. Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeBusk WF, Reddy KR, Koch MS, Wang Y (1994) Spatial distribution of soil nutrients in a Northern Everglades Marsh: water conservation area 2A. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallardo A (2003) Spatial variability of soil properties in a floodplain in Northwest Spain. Ecosystems 6:564–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner RAM, Gerrard AJ (2003) Runoff and soil erosion on cultivated rainfed terraces in the middle hills of Nepal. Appl Geogr 22:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry LE, David MB, Smith KM, Kovacic DA (1998) Nitrogen cycling and tile drainage nitrate loss in a corn/soybean watershed. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gessler PE, Moore ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1995) Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong X, Brueck H, Giese KM, Zhang L, Sattelmacher B, Lin S (2008) Slope aspect has effects on productivity and species composition of hilly grassland in the Xilin River basin, Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 72:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grunwald S (ed) (2006) Environmental soil-landscape modeling—geographic information technologies and pedometrics. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. Horn R, Dom H, Sowi ska-Jurkiewicz A, Van Ouwerkerk C (1995) Soil compaction processes and their effects on the structure of arable soils and the environment. Soil Tillage Res 35(1–2):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang CY (2000) Soil science. China Agriculture Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  20. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Jowkin V, Schoenau JJ (1998) Impact of tillage and landscape position on nitrogen availability and yield of spring wheat in brown soil zone in south-western Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 78:563–572Google Scholar
  22. Lal R (1998) Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 17:319–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu D, Wang Z, Zhang B, Song K, Li X, Li J, Li F, Duan H (2006) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, northeast China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu RK (1999) Method for agrochemical analysis of soil. China Agriculture, Science and Technology press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. Malo DD, Worcester BK (1975) Soil fertility and crop responses at selected landscape positions. Agron J 67:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McBratney AB, Mendonca Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Moulin AP, Anderson DW, Mellinger M (1994) Spatial variability of wheat yield, soil properties and erosion in hummocky terrain. Can J Soil Sci 74:219–228Google Scholar
  30. Noorbakhsh S, Schoenau J, Si B, Zeleke T, Qian P (2008) Soil properties, yield, and landscape relationships in south-central Saskatchewan Canada. J Plant Nutr 31:539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliver MA (1987) Geostatistics and its application to soil science. Soil Use Manag 3(1):8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliver MA, Webster R, Slocum K (2000) Filtering SPOT imagery by kriging analysis. J Remote Sens 21(4):735–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Park SJ, Vlek PLG (2002) Environmental correlation of three-dimensional spatial soil variability: a comparison of three adaptive techniques. Geoderma 109:117–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. RI ES (2008) ArcMap user’s guide, release 9.3. ESRI, Redlands CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Robertson GP (2000) GeoStatistics for the environmental sciences, Gamma design softwareGoogle Scholar
  36. Rundel PW (1981) The matorral zone of central Chile. In: di Castri F, Goodall DW, Spetch RL (eds) Mediterranean type shublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 175–201Google Scholar
  37. Shen S (1998) Soil fertility in China. Chinese Agriculture Press, Beijing, p 484 in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  38. Silveira ML, Comerford NB, Reddy KR, Prenger J, Debusk WF (2009) Soil properties as indicators of disturbance in forest ecosystems of Georgia, USA. Ecol Indic 9(4):740–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soil survey service of Hailun (1985) Soil science of Hailun journal. Heilongjiang Press, HarbinGoogle Scholar
  40. Soon YK, Malhi SS (2005) Soil nitrogen dynamics as affected by landscape position and nitrogen fertilizer. Can J Soil Sci 85:579–587Google Scholar
  41. Srividya A, Michael E, Palaniyandi M, Pani SP, Das PK (2002) A geostatical analysis of the geographic distribution of lymphatic filariasis prevalence in southern India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67(5):480–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang GA, Yang X (2006) Experimental course of ArcGIS for spatial analysis of geography information system. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  43. Tang CS, Drury CF, Soultani M, van Wesenbeeck IJ, Ng HYF, Gaynor JD, Welacky WT (1998) Effect of controlled drainage and tillage on soil structure and tile drainage nitrate loss at the field scale. Water Sci Technol 38(4–5):103–110Google Scholar
  44. Van Doren CA, Stauffer RS, Kidder EH (1950) Effect of contour farming on soil loss and runoff. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 15:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verity GE, Anderson DW (1990) Soil erosion effects on soil quality and yield. Can J Soil Sci 70:471–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Voroney RP, van Veen JA, Paul EA (1981) Organic C dynamics in grassland soils. 2. Model validation and simulation of the long-term effects of cultivation and rainfall erosion. Can J Soil Sci 61:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walson DA, Laflen JM (1986) Soil strength, slope, and rainfall intensity effect on interrill erosion. Trans ASAE 29:98–102Google Scholar
  48. Wang YF, Cai YC (1988) Studies on genesis, types and characteristics of the soils of the Xilin River Basin. Research on grassland ecosystem (No. 3). Science Press, Beijing, pp 23–83Google Scholar
  49. Wei J, Xiao D, Zhang X, Li X, Li X (2006) Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in relation to environmental factors of a typical small watershed in the black soil region, northeast China. Environ Monit Assess 121:597–613Google Scholar
  50. West TO, Post WM (2002) Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1930–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yan BX, Yang YH, Liu XT (2008) Character and trend of soil erosion in black soil north-eastern China. Soil Water Conserv China 12:26–31Google Scholar
  52. Yost RS, Uehara G, Fox RL (1982) Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas II. Kriging. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1033–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang XY, Sui YY, Zhang XD, Meng K, Herbert SJ (2007) Spatial variability of nutrient properties in black soil of Northeast China. Pedosphere 17(1):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaoliang Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Xingyi Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ted Huffman
    • 2
  • Xiaobing Liu
    • 1
  • Jingyi Yang
    • 5
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, National Observation Station of Hailun Agroecology System, Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesHarbinChina
  2. 2.Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research CenterAgriculture Agri-Food CanadaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.College of Resource and EnvironmentNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Greenhouse & Processing Crops Research CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaHarrowCanada

Personalised recommendations