Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal nitrogen availability from current and past applications of manure

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proper management of manure nitrogen (N) requires the ability to match the rate and extent of manure N availability with crop needs. This includes recognizing the potential importance of N contributions from residual manure N that accumulates with repeated applications. Nitrogen availability relative to barley needs was assessed in plots with 13–16 years continuous histories of contrasting manure-based (solid-bedded beef) and fertilizer-based soil treatments in the Maine Potato Ecosystem Project. Soil and barley samples were collected every 7–14 days during 2003–2005, and once in 2006. Barley dry matter and N content were equivalent between the two systems. In the manure-based system, temporal patterns of N availability were more synchronous with early season crop needs than in the fertilizer-based system, but continued mineralization after harvest was also observed. In 2004–2006, samples were collected from subplots where manure/fertilizer was withheld to estimate the proportion of available N originating from current versus previous manure applications. Apparent N recovery of current years’ applications of manure organic N was 8–11% and less than predicted by a standard decay series model for beef manure (25%), highlighting the need to adjust manure N credits for crops with shorter growing seasons and lower N uptake capacities than corn. The relative contribution of residual manure N to total manure N uptake was greater than predicted from the decay series model, providing support for a residual N effect from repeated manure applications that is not accounted for in standard manure recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DM:

Dry matter

MPEP:

Maine potato ecosystem project

Ni :

Inorganic N

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

References

  • Alyokhin A, Porter G, Groden E, Drummond F (2005) Colorado potato beetle response to soil amendments: a case in support of the mineral balance hypothesis? Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:234–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos JZ, Pratt PF (1981) Mineralization of manure nitrogen–correlation with laboratory indexes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:354–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BT (2004) Tightening the nitrogen cycle. In: Schjønning P et al (eds) Managing soil quality: challenges in modern agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 47–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gallandt ER, Mallory EB, Alford AR, Drummond FA, Groden E, Liebman M, Marra MC, McBurnie JC, Porter GA (1998) Comparison of alternative pest and soil management strategies for Maine potato production systems. Am J Alt Ag 13:146–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendining MJ, Poulton PR, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1997) Fate of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to spring barley grown on soils of contrasting nutrient status. Plant Soil 195:83–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins BR (1997) Soil testing handbook for professionals in agriculture, horticulture, nutrient and residuals management, 3rd edn. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Orono

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen HH, Beauchemin KA, Bruinsma Y, Campbell CA, Desjardins RL, Ellert BH, Smith EG (2003) The fate of nitrogen in agroecosystems: an illustration using Canadian estimates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 67:85–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen B, Sørensen P, Thomsen IK, Jensen ES, Christensen BT (1999) Availability of nitrogen in 15N-labeled ruminant manure components to successively grown crops. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:416–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson G (1992) Below-ground carbon distribution in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with and without nitrogen fertilization. Plant Soil 144:93–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ketterings QM, Albrecht G, Czymmek K, Bossard S (2005) Nitrogen credits from manure Fact Sheet 4. Cornell University Cooperative Extension, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausner S, Bouldin D (1983) Soil fertility, managing animal manure. Part II: field management. Cornell University Cooperative Extension, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausner SD, Rao Kanneganti V, Bouldin DR (1994) An approach for estimating a decay series for organic nitrogen in animal manure. Agron J 86:897–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laboski CAM, Peters JB, Bundy LG (2006) Nutrient application guidelines for field, vegetable, and fruit crops in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Extension, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmeier M, Frossard E, Kreuzer M, Mäder P, Dubois D, Oberson A (2002) Nitrogen fertilizer value of cattle manure applied on soils originating from organic and conventional farming systems. Agronomie 22:789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikam DF, Lamond RE (2003) Estimating manure nutrient availability. Kansas State University, Manhattan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Dwyer LM, Gregorich EG (1999) Soil nitrogen amendment effects on seasonal nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling in maize production. Agron J 91:1003–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff FR (1978) Influence of manure application rates and continuous corn on soil-N. Agron J 70:629–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff F (1991) Managing nitrogen for sustainable corn systems: problems and possibilities. Am J Alt Ag 6:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallory EB, Griffin TS (2007) Impacts of soil amendment history on nitrogen availability from manure and fertilizer. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:964–973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallory EB, Porter GA (2007) Potato yield stability under contrasting soil management strategies. Agron J 99:501–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Steinfeld H, Falcon W, Galloway J, Smil V, Bradford E, Alder J, Mooney H (2005) Losing the links between livestock and land. Science 310:1621–1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D, Sommers L (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks D et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, pp 961–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter GA (1996) General methods. In: Marra MC (ed) The ecology, economics, and management of potato cropping systems: a report of the first 4 years of the Maine Potato Ecosystem Project. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Bulletin 843, Orono, pp 161–174

  • Porter GA, McBurnie JC (1996) Crop and soil research. In: Marra MC (ed) The ecology, economics, and management of potato cropping systems: a report of the first 4 years of the Maine Potato Ecosystem Project. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Bulletin 843, Orono, pp 8–62

  • Pratt PF, Broodbent FE, Martin JP (1973) Using organic wastes as nitrogen fertilizers. Calif Agric 27:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth GW, Fox RH (1990) Soil nitrate accumulations following nitrogen-fertilized corn in Pennsylvania. J Environ Qual 19:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russelle MP, Entz MH, Franzluebbers AJ (2007) Reconsidering integrated crop-livestock systems in North America. Agron J 99:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J (2005) Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresource Technol 96:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J, Uenk D, Hilhorst G (2007) Long-term nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of cattle manures applied to cut grassland. Plant Soil 299:83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen J, Chang C, Olson B (2001) Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization potentials of soils receiving repeated annual cattle manure applications. Biol Fertil Soil 34:334–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zebarth BJ, Leclerc Y, Moreau G, Gareau R, Milburn PH (2003) Soil inorganic nitrogen content in commercial potato fields in New Brunswick. Can J Soil Sci 83:425–429

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank A. Randall Alford, Francis A. Drummond, M. S. Erich, Eric R. Gallandt, Eleanor Groden, David A. Lambert, Matt Liebman, Michele C. Marra, Jeffrey C. McBurnie, Bacilio Salas and many others for creating and overseeing the Maine Potato Ecosystem Project, Melissa Albert for her technical assistance with this research, and Sue Erich, Michel Cavigelli, and Bryan Dail for reviewing the manuscript. This research was supported in part by USDA-CSREES-IFAFS no. 2001-52101-11308 and the Maine Potato Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen B. Mallory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mallory, E.B., Griffin, T.S. & Porter, G.A. Seasonal nitrogen availability from current and past applications of manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88, 351–360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9361-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9361-9

Keywords

Navigation