Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recycling of legume residues for nitrogen economy and higher productivity in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contribution of legumes towards N economy in cereal-based cropping systems is well-known but there has been a gradual decline in the cultivation of grain legumes, threatening sustainability of maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in north-western India. A study was made to evaluate and quantify the effect of different grain legumes on productivity, profitability, N economy and soil fertility in maize–wheat cropping system at New Delhi during 2002–2004. Five legumes, viz. blackgram (Vigna mungo), greengram (Vigna radiata), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and soybean (Glycine max) were either intercropped with maize or grown in sole cropping, and their residues were incorporated before the following crop of wheat, which was grown with varying rates of N, viz. 0, 40, 80 and 120 kg N ha−1. Maize-equivalent productivity was significantly more with intercropped greengram (16.1–29.9%), cowpea (24.8%) and groundnut (11.1–16.6%) than in sole maize. Land equivalent ratio and other competitive functions were favourably influenced with intercropped maize + greengram and maize + cowpea. Addition of N through legume residues varied from 11.5–38.5 kg ha−1 in intercropped system and 17.5–83.5 kg ha−1 in sole cropping, which improved productivity of following wheat to a variable extent. Nitrogen economy in wheat was 21 kg ha−1 due to residue incorporation of intercropped greengram, cowpea and groundnut; and 49–56 kg N ha−1 of sole cropped greengram and groundnut. Residual soil fertility in terms of organic C and KMnO4-N showed an improvement under maize-based intercropping systems followed by wheat, and the beneficial effect was more pronounced with sole cropping of legumes due to greater addition of residues. Apparent N balance as well as actual change in KMnO4-N at the end of study was positive in most intercropped legumes as well as sole cropping systems, with greater improvement noticed under groundnut, soybean and greengram. Net returns were marginal with maize-based intercropping or sole cropping of legumes, but improved considerably with wheat, particularly when greengram, cowpea and groundnut were grown in the previous season. The studies suggested that inclusion of grain legumes, particularly greengram, cowpea and groundnut was beneficial for improving productivity, profitability, N economy and soil fertility in maize–wheat cropping system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JR, Obura RK (1983) Yield of corn, cowpea and soybean under different intercropping systems. Agron J 75:1005–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Banik P, Bagchi DK (1994) Evaluation of rice and legume intercropping in upland situation of Bihar plateau. Indian J Agr Sci 64(6):364–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Buresh RJ, De Datta SK (1991) Nitrogen dynamics and management in rice-legume cropping systems. Adv Agron 45:1–59. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60037-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins HP, Rasmussen PE, Douglas CL Jr (1992) Crop rotation and residue management effects on soil carbon and microbial dynamics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56(3):783–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangwar KS, Sharma SK (1994) Fodder-legume intercropping in maize (Zea mays) and its effect on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J Agr Sci 64(1):38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh PK, Bandypadhyay KK, Wanjari RH, Manna MC, Mishra AK, Mohanty M et al (2007) Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use efficiency in major cropping systems—an Indian perspective: a review. J Sustain Agric 30(1):61–86. doi:10.1300/J064v30n01_07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulugalle NR, Larsen DL, Henggeler S (1996) Effect of broad beds and Dolichos residue management on properties of an irrigated vertisol. Soil Technol 8(4):275–286. doi:10.1016/0933-3630(95)00024-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAR (2007) Agricultural research data book. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Khola OPS, Dube RK, Sharma NK (1999) Conservation and production ability of maize (Zea mays)—legume intercropping systems under varying dates of sowing. Indian J Agron 44(1):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Prasad NK (1999) Energetics and economics of cropping sequences and nitrogen levels. Indian J Agron 44(4):677–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Adv Agron 87:85–143. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(05)87003-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lupwayi NZ, Kennedy AC (2007) Grain legumes in northern plains: impacts on selected biological processes. Agron J 99:1700–1709. doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0313s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra BS, Sharma GL (1995) Effect of summer legumes on growth and yield of lowland rice (Oryza sativa) and its residual effect on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum) in rice–wheat system. Indian J Agr Sci 65(8):557–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitra S, Ghosh DC, Sounda G, Jana PK, Roy DK (2000) Productivity, competition and economics of intercropping legumes in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) at different fertility levels. Indian J Agr Sci 70(12):824–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal BK, Mahapatra SK (1990) Barley, lentil and flax yield under different intercropping systems. Agron J 82:1066–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead R, Willey RW (1980) Measuring the advantages of intercropping. Exp Agric 16:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroda RS (1997) Production of pulse crops in Asia—present scenario and future options. In: Asthana AN, Ali M (eds) Recent advances in pulses research. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India, pp 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra BC, Mandal BB, Mandal BK, Padhi AK (1999) Suitability of maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping system. Indian J Agr Sci 69(11):759–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra BC, Mandal BK, Padhi AK (2000) Production potential of winter maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping system. Indian J Agr Sci 70(4):202–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawar KP, Jadhav AS (1995) Nutrient balance in legume-sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cropping sequence. Indian J Agr Sci 65(7):515–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Sharma SN (2006) Learning by doing exercises in soil fertility. Division of Agronomy, Indian agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Willey RW (1980) Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping on sorghum/pigeonpea. Exp Agric 16:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MR, Willey RW (1980) Growth and resource use studies in an intercrop of pearlmillet/groundnut. Field Crops Res 4:13–24. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(81)90050-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma GL, Mahapatra BS, Singh AK, Pandey BM (1998) Role of summer legumes on productivity of maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system on sandy loam soil of western Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Agr Sci 68(6):295–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivakumar BG, Mishra BN (2001) Effect of land configuration, nutrient and stover management on growth and yield of wheat under limited water supply. Ann Agr Res 22(4):462–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivay YS, Singh RP, Pandey CS (1999) Response of nitrogen in maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping system. Indian J Agron 44(2):261–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivran DR, Ahlawat IPS (2000) Effect of cropping systems and fertilizers on pigeonpea (Cajanas cajan) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) in pigeonpea-wheat sequence. Indian J Agron 45(4):669–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddeswaran K, Ramaswami C, Morachan YB (1989) Nutrient uptake of finger millet as influenced by intercrops, border crops and N fertilization. Madras Agr J 76:361–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP (1983) Planned intercropping can improve yields of small farmers. Int Agr Dev 3:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RV, Arya MPS (1999) Nitrogen requirement of fingermillet (Eleusine coracana) + pulse intercropping system. Indian J Agron 44(1):47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao NS (1988) Biological nitrogen fixation: recent developments. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao GV, Kumar Rao JVDK, Kumar J, Johansen C, Deb UK, Ahmed I et al (2001) Spatial distribution and quantification of rice fallow in South Asia—potential for legumes, ICRISAT, Hyderabad; NRSA, Hyderabad and DFID, UK, p 315

  • Swaminathan MS (1998) Crop production and sustainable food security. In: Chopra VL, Singh RB and Verma, Anupam (eds) Crop productivity and sustainability—shaping the future. Proceedings of the Second International Crop Science Congress, New Delhi, India pp 3–18

  • Willey RW, Rao MR (1980) A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp Agric 16:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A.R., Behera, U.K. Recycling of legume residues for nitrogen economy and higher productivity in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 83, 197–210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9212-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9212-0

Keywords

Navigation