Abstract
The theory, and the statistics and mathematics of using factorial fertiliser trials to assist in making fertiliser recommendations for neighbouring commercial plantings is presented as a conceptual framework and in a format for practical application. As an example, the yield and leaf nutrient levels from a typical factorial fertiliser rate trial (nitrogen by potassium) were modelled using multiple linear regression and the resulting response surfaces used to determine the maximum agronomic yield and optimum economic yield and to calculate the requirement for ‘basal’ fertiliser. Leaf nutrient data in both the trial and commercial plantings was used to estimate the requirement for ‘corrective’ fertiliser, where necessary, to increase the leaf nutrient levels to the target leaf nutrient level for maximum yield. All the mathematics required can be incorporated into a spreadsheet calculator that uses costs (e.g. fertiliser) and prices (e.g. oil) to calculate optimum economic fertiliser application rates. Problems with extrapolating the results of fertiliser trials to commercial plantings can be overcome by matching each trial with a corresponding commercial planting domain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson RL, Nelson LA (1975) A family of models involving intersecting straight lines and concomitant experimental designs useful in evaluating response to fertilizer nutrients. Biometrics 31:303–318. doi:10.2307/2529422
Campbell LC (1998) Managing soil fertility decline. In: Rengel Z (ed) Nutrient use in crop production. Hawthorn Press Inc., New York, pp 29–52
Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2003) The oil palm, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Foster HL (2003) Assessment of oil palm fertiliser requirements. In: Fairhurst T, Härdter R (eds) Oil palm: management for large and sustainable yields. Potash & Phosphate Institute/Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada/International Potash Institute, Singapore, pp 231–257
Hartley CWS (1988) The oil palm, 3rd edn. Longman, London
Kraip J, Webb MJ (2005) Monitoring of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) leaf nutrient variations to help interpret routine leaf sampling results: PNG OPRA trial 136. Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association, Kimbe. p 29
Melling L, Goh KJ, Hatano R (2006) Short-term effect of urea on CH4 flux under the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) on tropical peat-land in Sarawak, Malaysia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:788–792. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00092.x
Rankine IR, Fairhurst TH (1999) Field handbook-oil palm series, vol 3. Mature, Potash and Phosphate Institute, Singapore
Smith FW, Loneragan JF (1997) Interpretation of plant analysis: concepts and principles. In: Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (eds) Plant analysis: an interpretation manual. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 3–33
Verdooren R (2003) Design and analysis of fertiliser experiments. In: Fairhurst T, Härdter R (eds) Oil palm: management for large and sustainable yields. Potash & Phosphate Institute/Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada/International Potash Institute, Singapore, pp 259–278
Wilkie AS, Foster HL (1989) Oil palm response to fertilisers in Papua New Guinea. In: PORIM international palm oil development conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–8 September, 1989, pp 395–405
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted while the author was employed by Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association. The author wishes to thank Dr Hugh Foster for an introduction to the use of multiple linear regression as a method of analysing factorial trials; and Thomas Fairhurst for critically reviewing and improving the manuscript before submission. The author also wishes to thank staff of the Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association and Milne Bay Estates for conducting and maintaining Trial 504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webb, M.J. A conceptual framework for determining economically optimal fertiliser use in oil palm plantations with factorial fertiliser trials. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 83, 163–178 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9207-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9207-x