Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nitrogen balance and accumulation pattern in three contrasting prairie soils receiving repeated applications of liquid swine and solid cattle manure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The expansion of intensive livestock operations in western Canada has increased concerns about overloading of nutrients in manured lands. The magnitude of nutrient accumulation and its distribution in the soil profile varies with soil-climatic conditions. The objective of this study was to determine loading and distribution of manure-derived nitrogen (N) in the soil profile as influenced by repeated manure applications. Four field experiments were conducted at three sites (Dixon, Melfort and Plenty) in Saskatchewan under longer-term manure management. The four field experiments provide contrasts in soil type, climatic conditions, manure type, application and cropping history to enable the effect of these factors to be evaluated. Liquid hog manure (LHM—Experiment 1) and solid cattle manure (SCM—Experiment 2) treatments were applied annually over 8 years at Dixon (Black Chernozemic loam soil—Udic Boroll in sub-humid climate), while only LHM was applied at Plenty (Dark Brown Chernozemic heavy clay soil—Typic Boroll in semi-arid climate) over 6 years (Experiment 3), and at Melfort (Dark Gray Luvisol silty clay loam soil—Mollic Cryoboralf in humid climate) over 5 years (Experiment 4). Soil samples were collected in the spring and autumn of 2003 and 2004, and were analyzed for organic N, ammonium-N (NH +4 -N) and nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) concentrations. Plant samples were collected to determine the impact of manure application rate on plant N uptake and crop N removal. The annual application of LHM (37,000 L ha−1  yr−1) and SCM (7.6 Mg ha−1 yr−1) at agronomic rates at Dixon (added N balances crop demand for that year), or larger rates of LHM (111,000 L ha−1) applied once every 3 years (Melfort) did not significantly elevate NO 3 -N in soil compared to the unfertilized control. Lower crop removal and reduced leaching of NO 3 -N due to drier conditions as occurred at the Plenty site contributed to greater accumulation of nitrate in the top 60 cm at equivalent rates compared to the other two sites. At large manure rates, excess N from the balance estimates could not be accounted for in soil organic N and was assumed to be lost from the soil-plant system. At the Dixon LHM site, deep leaching of NO 3 -N was observed at the excessive rate (148,000 L ha−1 yr−1) up to the 150 cm depth, compared to the control. At Dixon, the large annual application rate of SCM (30.4 Mg ha−1 yr−1) did not significantly increase NO 3 -N in the 0–60 cm soil compared to the control, which was attributed to lower mineralization of organic N from the SCM. Over the short and medium term, LHM application at large rates every year poses a greater risk for loading and deep migration of NO 3 -N in soil than large rates of SCM. Larger single applications made once every 3 years were not associated with accumulation or deep leaching. To prevent loading, rates of applied manure nitrogen should be reduced when crop N removal potential is diminished by high frequency of drought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Brinton WF (1985) Nitrogen response of maize to fresh and composted manure. Biol Agric Hortic 3:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Entz T (1996) Nitrate leaching losses under repeated cattle feedlot manure applications in southern Alberta. J Environ Qual 25:145–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chantigny MH, Rochette P, Angers DA (2001) Short-term C and N dynamics in a soil amended with pig slurry and barley straw: A field experiment. Can J Soil Sci 81:131–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Janzen HH (1996) Long-term fate of nitrogen from annual feedlot manure applications. J Environ Qual 25:785–790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl RJ, Schmidt JP, Stone LR, Maddux LD (2004) Quantifying nitrate leaching in sandy soils as affected by N and water management, vol 10. In: Schlegel AJ (ed), Proceedings of Great Plains Soil Fertility Conference. Kansas State University, 2–3 March, 2004, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., pp 4–7

  • Keeney DR (1982) Nitrogen management for maximum efficiency and minimum pollution. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils. Agron. Monogr. 22. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, U.S.A., pp 605–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen—inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI., U.S.A., pp 643–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooleki SP, Schoenau JJ, Hultgreen G, Wen G, Charles JL (2002) Effect of rate, frequency and method of liquid swine manure application on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and N use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 82:457–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooleki SP, Schoenau JJ, Charles JL, Wen G (2004) Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 84:199–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JE, Chichester FW (1994) Tillage system effects on soil and plant nutrient distributions on vertisols. J Prod Agric 7:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul JW, Beauchamp EG (1994) Short-term nitrogen dynamics in soil amended with fresh and composted cattle manures. Can J Soil Sci 74:147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian P, Schoenau JJ (2000) Use of ion exchange membrane to assess soil N supply to canola as affected by addition of liquid swine manure and urea. Can J Soil Sci 80:213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian P, Schoenau JJ (2002) Availability of nitrogen in solid manure amendments with different C:N ratios. Can J Soil Sci 82:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS user’s guide. Statistics, Version 5, ed. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, U.S.A

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenau JJ, Bolton K, Panchuk K (2000) Managing Manure as a Fertilizer. Farm Facts. Publ. SUSMMF1100. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Schoenau JJ, Mooleki SP, Malhi SS, Hultgreen G (2004) Strategies for maximizing crop recovery of nutrients applies as liquid swine manure, vol 10. In: Schlegel AJ (ed) Proceedings of Great Plains Soil Fertility Conference. Kansas State University. 2–3 Mar. 2004. Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., pp 8–14

  • Technicon Industrial Systems (1973) Ammonia in acid digest. Industrial Method No. 325-74W. Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RL, Sheard RW, Moyer JR (1967) Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron J 59:240–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weil RR, Weismiller RA, Turner RS (1990) Nitrate contamination of groundwater under irrigated coastal plain soils. J Environ Qual 19:441–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund and SaskPork is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Schoenau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stumborg, C., Schoenau, J.J. & Malhi, S.S. Nitrogen balance and accumulation pattern in three contrasting prairie soils receiving repeated applications of liquid swine and solid cattle manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78, 15–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9071-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9071-5

Keywords

Navigation