Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in shale with plastic deformation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing in combination with horizontal well has been widely used to stimulate shale oil and gas from reservoirs. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing is a great challenge due to the geological complexity of reservoirs. In this paper, a fully coupled fluid flow, plastic deformation and fracture propagation model is presented based on cohesive zone method. An implicit algorithm to discretize and integrate the fully coupled differential equations is presented. Plastic deformation is observed in the vicinity of hydraulic fracture during the stimulation process. The effect of plastic and stimulation parameters on fracture propagation behaviors has been investigated. The energy dissipation induced by the plastic deformation increases the fracture width. The fracture propagation behaviors both in viscosity and toughness dominated regimes are discussed. The evolution formula of non-dimensional fracture length at different regimes is presented by fitting numerical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Areias P, Rabczuk T (2010) Smooth finite strain plasticity with non-local pressure support. Int J Numer Meth Eng 81(1):106–134

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Areias P, Rabczuk T, De Sá JC (2015) Semi-implicit finite strain constitutive integration of porous plasticity models. Finite Elem Anal Des 104:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Areias P, Msekh M, Rabczuk T (2016) Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing. Eng Fract Mech 158:116–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Areias P, Rabczuk T, Msekh M (2016) Phase-field analysis of finite-strain plates and shells including element subdivision. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:322–350

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Areias P, Reinoso J, Camanho P, De Sá JC, Rabczuk T (2018) Effective 2d and 3d crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation. Eng Fract Mech 189:339–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahina D, Pan P, Tsusaka K, Takeda M, Bolander JE (2018) Simulating hydraulic fracturing processes in laboratory-scale geological media using three-dimensional tough-RBSN. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10(6):1102–1111

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor CK, Batchelor G (2000) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (2012) Finite element modelling of viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures. J Petrol Sci Eng 88:136–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Jeffrey RG, Zhang X, Kear J (2018) Finite-element simulation of a hydraulic fracture interacting with a natural fracture. SPE J 22(01):219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Lan H, Macciotta R, Martin CD, Wu Y (2021) Microfracture characterization of shale constrained by mineralogy and bedding. J Petrol Sci Eng 201:108456

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Neto EA, Peric D, Owen DR (2011) Computational methods for plasticity: theory and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dontsov E, Peirce A (2014) Slurry flow, gravitational settling, and a proppant transport model for hydraulic fractures

  • Fu P, Johnson SM, Carrigan CR (2013) An explicitly coupled hydro-geomechanical model for simulating hydraulic fracturing in arbitrary discrete fracture networks. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(14):2278–2300

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Anitescu C, Chakraborty S, Rabczuk T (2020) Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 106:102447

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasle W, Plischke I (2010) LT-A experiment: mechanical behavior of Opalinus clay, data report from phase 15. Mont Terri Technical Note TN 86:2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräsle W, Plischke I (2011) LT-A experiment: mechanical behavior of Opalinus clay, data report from phase 15. Mont Terri Technical Note TN 2010:86

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Zhuang X, Chen P, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T (2022) Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media. Eng Comput pp 1–26

  • Hu Y, Wang Q, Zhao J, Chen S, Li D, Xu R, Zhao C (2021) Numerical simulation of complex fracture geometry caused by hydrodynamics in shale with pre-existing weak planes. J Petrol Sci Eng 199:108306

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Liu J, Zhang F, Dontsov E, Damjanac B (2019) Exploring the influence of rock inherent heterogeneity and grain size on hydraulic fracturing using discrete element modeling. Int J Solids Struct 176:207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski M, Shen B, Rinne M (2019) Simulation of the interactions between hydraulic and natural fractures using a fracture mechanics approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11(6):1138–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L (2021) Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys 3(6):422–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen PK, Martínez-Pañeda E (2020) Phase field fracture modelling using quasi-newton methods and a new adaptive step scheme. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 107:102446

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawal AI, Kwon S (2021) Application of artificial intelligence to rock mechanics: an overview. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13(1):248–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Wheeler MF, Wick T (2016) Pressure and fluid-driven fracture propagation in porous media using an adaptive finite element phase field model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:111–132

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Caner FC, Chau VT, Bažant ZP (2017) Spherocylindrical microplane constitutive model for shale and other anisotropic rocks. J Mech Phys Solids 103:155–178

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Jia D, Rui Z, Peng J, Fu C, Zhang J (2017) Evaluation method of rock brittleness based on statistical constitutive relations for rock damage. J Petrol Sci Eng 153:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Xie H, Wang J (2020) Anisotropic characteristics of crack initiation and crack damage thresholds for shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 126:104178

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Shi F, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Deng D, Wang X, Liu H, Wu H (2017) High injection rate stimulation for improving the fracture complexity in tight-oil sandstone reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 42:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Shen Y, Zhang J, Lu D, Liu H, Wu H (2019) Production analysis in shale gas reservoirs based on fracturing-enhanced permeability areas. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 62(10):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Zhang J, Yu H, Chen J, Lu D, Wu H (2020) New insights of natural fractures growth and stimulation optimization based on a three-dimensional cohesive zone model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 76:103165

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Wang L, Ge Z, Zhou Z, Deng K, Zuo S (2020) Fracture and pore structure dynamic evolution of coals during hydraulic fracturing. Fuel 259:116272

    Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Mauthe S (2016) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. part III. crack driving forces in hydro-poro-elasticity and hydraulic fracturing of fluid-saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 304:619–655

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CK, Waters GA, Rylander EI et al. (2011) Evaluation of production log data from horizontal wells drilled in organic shales. In: North American unconventional gas conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers

  • Nejati M, Aminzadeh A, Amann F, Saar MO, Driesner T (2020) Mode i fracture growth in anisotropic rocks: theory and experiment. Int J Solids Struct 195:74–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni T, Pesavento F, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U, Zhu Q-Z, Schrefler BA (2020) Hybrid fem and peridynamic simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 366:113101

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi S, Chen Z, Bobaru F (2021) Crack nucleation in brittle and quasi-brittle materials: a peridynamic analysis. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 112:102855

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 44(9):1267–1282

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi H, Foster JT, Sharma MM (2017) Effect of reservoir heterogeneity on the vertical migration of hydraulic fractures. J Petrol Sci Eng 151:384–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisio F, Samat S, Laloui L (2015) Constitutive analysis of shale: a coupled damage plasticity approach. Int J Solids Struct 75:88–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabczuk T, Belytschko T (2004) Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61(13):2316–2343

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabczuk T, Gracie R, Song J-H, Belytschko T (2010) Immersed particle method for fluid-structure interaction. Int J Numer Meth Eng 81(1):48–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Zhuang X, Cai Y, Rabczuk T (2016) Dual-horizon peridynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 108(12):1451–1476

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Zhuang X, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T (2019) An explicit phase field method for brittle dynamic fracture. Comput Struct 217:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice J (1979) The mechanics of earthquake rupture. Division of Engineering, Brown University Providence, Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh VM, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2020) An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 362:112790

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Savitski A, Detournay E (2002) Propagation of a penny-shaped fluid-driven fracture in an impermeable rock: asymptotic solutions. Int J Solids Struct 39(26):6311–6337

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen X, Standifird W (2017) Numerical simulation in hydraulic fracturing: multiphysics theory and applications, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Zhao Y-P (2018) Combined effect of pressure and shear stress on penny-shaped fluid-driven cracks. J Appl Mech 85(3)

  • Shi F (2021) Xfem-based numerical modeling of well performance considering proppant transport, embedment, crushing and rock creep in shale gas reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 201:108523

    Google Scholar 

  • Simo JC, Hughes TJ (2006) Computational inelasticity, vol 7. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon I, Elliot H (1946) The opening of a Griffith crack under internal pressure. Q Appl Math 4(3):262–267

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman MY, East L, Augustine J (2010) Fracturing design aimed at enhancing fracture complexity. In: SPE EUROPEC/EAGE annual conference and exhibition. OnePetro

  • Tang J, Wu K, Zuo L, Xiao L, Sun S, Ehlig-Economides C et al (2019) Investigation of rupture and slip mechanisms of hydraulic fractures in multiple-layered formations. SPE J 24(05):2–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomar V, Zhai J, Zhou M (2004) Bounds for element size in a variable stiffness cohesive finite element model. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61(11):1894–1920

  • Wen S, Zhang C, Chang Y, Hu P (2020) Dynamic compression characteristics of layered rock mass of significant strength changes in adjacent layers. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 12(2):353–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson ZA, Landis CM (2016) Phase-field modeling of hydraulic fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 96:264–290

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Yao W, Xia K (2020) Numerical study on tensile failures of heterogeneous rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 12(1):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • York JR et al. (2018). Advanced hydraulic fracture modeling: peridynamics, inelasticity, and coupling to FEM. PhD thesis

  • Zeng Q, Liu Z, Wang T, Gao Y, Zhuang Z (2018) Fully coupled simulation of multiple hydraulic fractures to propagate simultaneously from a perforated horizontal wellbore. Comput Mech 61(1):137–155

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Chen C, Yan H (2019) A thermal damage constitutive model for oil shale based on Weibull statistical theory. Math Probl Eng

  • Zheng S, Hwang J, Manchanda R, Sharma MM (2021) An integrated model for non-isothermal multi-phase flow, geomechanics and fracture propagation. J Petrol Sci Eng 196:107716

  • Zhou S, Zhuang X, Zhu H, Rabczuk T (2018) Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 96:174–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2019) Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 350:169–198

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Lu D, Su C, Gao Z, Du X (2022) An unconstrained stress updating algorithm with the line search method for elastoplastic soil models. Comput Geotech 143:104592

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang X, Zhou S, Sheng M, Li G (2020) On the hydraulic fracturing in naturally-layered porous media using the phase field method. Eng Geol 266:105306

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou J, Jiao Y-Y, Tan F, Lv J, Zhang Q (2021) Complex hydraulic-fracture-network propagation in a naturally fractured reservoir. Comput Geotech 135:104165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly supported byNational Natural Science Foundation of China (12102173), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (1908085QA32) and General Project of Natural Science Research in Universities of Jiangsu Province (21KJB130001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 211816, Jiangsu, China

    Chuang Liu & Zexing Wang

Authors
  1. Chuang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zexing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: CL; Methodology: CL; Analysis and investigation: CL, ZW; Writing: CL; Supervision: CL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuang Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Wang, Z. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in shale with plastic deformation. Int J Fract 238, 115–132 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00659-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00659-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation