International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 206, Issue 2, pp 131–149 | Cite as

Influence of pre-compression on the ductility of AA6xxx aluminium alloys

  • B. H. Frodal
  • K. O. Pedersen
  • T. Børvik
  • O. S. Hopperstad
Original Paper

Abstract

Reversed loading experiments were conducted to study the influence of pre-compression on the ductility of three aluminium alloys. Diabolo-shaped specimens were machined from extruded profiles along the transverse direction, and heat treated to peak strength (T6 temper). The specimens were subjected to five different levels of pre-compression (0, 10, 20, 30, 40%), i.e., the specimens were first compressed to a prescribed strain and then pulled to fracture in tension. Using a laser-based measuring system, the minimum diameter in the extrusion direction and thickness direction were continuously measured during the tests until fracture. The three aluminium alloys AA6060, AA6082.25 and AA6082.50 had different grain structure and texture. The AA6060 and AA6082.50 alloys had recrystallized grain structure with equi-axed grains and large elongated grains, respectively. The AA6082.25 alloy had a non-recrystallized, fibrous grain structure. It was found that pre-compression has a marked influence on the ductility of the aluminium alloys, which depends on the microstructure and strength of the alloy. Using the compressed configuration as the reference configuration, the relative failure strain could be calculated. For the AA6060 alloy, the relative failure strain increased for increasing pre-compression, and was approximately doubled for 40% pre-compression compared to pure tension. For the AA6082.25 alloy, a slight increase in the relative failure strain was observed for increasing pre-compression, while for the AA6082.50 alloy the relative failure strain was low and approximately constant for different levels of pre-compression.

Keywords

Aluminium alloys Ductile fracture Reversed loading Pre-compression Microstructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of this work from the Centre for Advanced Structural Analysis (CASA), Centre for Research-based Innovation (CRI) at the Norwegian University of science and Technology (NTNU), is gratefully acknowledged. M.Sc. Emil Christiansen at CASA is gratefully acknowledged for providing the data of the precipitate free zones for the three alloys.

References

  1. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and lode dependence. Int J Plast 24(6):1071–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao Y, Treitler R (2004a) Ductile crack formation on notched Al2024-T351 bars under compression–tension loading. Mater Sci Eng A 384(1–2):385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004b) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46(1):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsoum I, Faleskog J (2007) Rupture mechanisms in combined tension and shear—experiments. Int J Solids Struct 44(6):1768–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benzerga AA, Surovik D, Keralavarma SM (2012) On the path-dependence of the fracture locus in ductile materials—analysis. Int J Plast 37:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchard PO, Bourgeon L, Lachapèle H, Maire E, Verdu C, Forestier R, Logé RE (2008) On the influence of particle distribution and reverse loading on damage mechanisms of ductile steels. Mater Sci Eng A 496(1–2):223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell J (2011) The origin of Griffith cracks. Metall Mater Trans B 42(6):1091–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Pedersen KO, Clausen AH, Hopperstad OS (2009) An experimental study on the dynamic fracture of extruded AA6xxx and AA7xxx aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 523(1–2):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiansen E (2017) Personal communication. Centre for Advanced Structural Analysis (CASA), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Google Scholar
  10. Dæhli LEB, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2016) Influence of loading path on ductile fracture of tensile specimens made from aluminium alloys. Int J Solids Struct 88–89:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dowling JM, Martin JW (1976) The influence of MN additions on the deformation behaviour of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Acta Metall 24(12):1147–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drucker DC, Mylonas C, Lianis G (1960) Exhaustion of ductility of E-steel in tension following compressive prestrain. Weld J (Res Suppl) 39:117–120Google Scholar
  13. Enami K (2005) The effects of compressive and tensile prestrain on ductile fracture initiation in steels. Eng Fract Mech 72(7):1089–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faleskog J, Barsoum I (2013) Tension-torsion fracture experiments—part I: experiments and a procedure to evaluate the equivalent plastic strain. Int J Solids Struct 50(25–26):4241–4257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao X, Zhang G, Roe C (2009) A study on the effect of the stress state on ductile fracture. Int J Damage Mech 19(1):75–94Google Scholar
  16. Graham SM, Zhang T, Gao X, Hayden M (2012) Development of a combined tension-torsion experiment for calibration of ductile fracture models under conditions of low triaxiality. Int J Mech Sci 54(1):172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruben G, Fagerholt E, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T (2011) Fracture characteristics of a cold-rolled dual-phase steel. Eur J Mech A Solids 30(3):204–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruben G, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T (2012) Evaluation of uncoupled ductile fracture criteria for the dual-phase steel Docol 600DL. Int J Mech Sci 62(1):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoang NH, Hopperstad OS, Myhr OR, Marioara C, Langseth M (2015) An improved nano-scale material model applied in axial-crushing analyses of square hollow section aluminium profiles. Thin Walled Struct 92:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khadyko M, Dumoulin S, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2014) An experimental-numerical method to determine the work-hardening of anisotropic ductile materials at large strains. Int J Mech Sci 88:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khadyko M, Dumoulin S, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2015) Simulation of large-strain behaviour of aluminium alloy under tensile loading using anisotropic plasticity models. Comput Struct 157:60–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khadyko M, Marioara CD, Ringdalen IG, Dumoulin S, Hopperstad OS (2016) Deformation and strain localization in polycrystals with plastically heterogeneous grains. Int J Plast 86:128–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristoffersen M, Børvik T, Westermann I, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS (2013) Impact against X65 steel pipes—an experimental investigation. Int J Solids Struct 50(20–21):3430–3445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kristoffersen M, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2016) Using unit cell simulations to investigate fracture due to compression–tension loading. Eng Fract Mech 162:269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lloyd DJ (2003) The scaling of the tensile ductile fracture strain with yield strength in Al alloys. Scr Mater 48(4):341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lohne O, Naess OJ (1979) The effect of dispersoids and grain size on mechanical properties of AlMgSi alloys. In: Haasen P, Gerold V, Kostorz G (eds) Strength of metals and alloys. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 781–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludley JH, Drucker DC (1960) A reversed bend test to study ductile to brittle transition. Weld J 39:543s–546sGoogle Scholar
  28. Maire E, Zhou S, Adrien J, Dimichiel M (2011) Damage quantification in aluminium alloys using in situ tensile tests in X-ray tomography. Eng Fract Mech 78(15):2679–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcadet SJ, Mohr D (2015) Effect of compression-tension loading reversal on the strain to fracture of dual phase steel sheets. Int J Plast 72:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgeneyer TF, Starink MJ, Wang SC, Sinclair I (2008) Quench sensitivity of toughness in an Al alloy: direct observation and analysis of failure initiation at the precipitate-free zone. Acta Mater 56(12):2872–2884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Papasidero J, Doquet V, Mohr D (2015) Ductile fracture of aluminum 2024-T351 under proportional and non-proportional multi-axial loading: Bao–Wierzbicki results revisited. Int J Solids Struct 69–70:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pedersen KO, Roven HJ, Lademo OG, Hopperstad OS (2008) Strength and ductility of aluminium alloy AA7030. Mater Sci Eng A 473(1–2):81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pedersen KO, Westermann I, Furu T, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2015) Influence of microstructure on work-hardening and ductile fracture of aluminium alloys. Mater Des 70:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pineau A, Benzerga AA, Pardoen T (2016) Failure of metals I: brittle and ductile fracture. Acta Mater 107:424–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spitzig WA, Richmond O (1984) The effect of pressure on the flow stress of metals. Acta Metall 32(3):457–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spitzig WA, Sober RJ, Richmond O (1975) Pressure dependence of yielding and associated volume expansion in tempered martensite. Acta Metall 23(7):885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas N, Basu S, Benzerga AA (2016) On fracture loci of ductile materials under non-proportional loading. Int J Mech Sci 117:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toda H, Oogo H, Horikawa K, Uesugi K, Takeuchi A, Suzuki Y, Nakazawa M, Aoki Y, Kobayashi M (2013) The true origin of ductile fracture in aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 45(2):765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westermann I, Pedersen KO, Furu T, Børvik T, Hopperstad OS (2014) Effects of particles and solutes on strength, work-hardening and ductile fracture of aluminium alloys. Mech Mater 79:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson CD (2002) A critical reexamination of classical metal plasticity. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 69(1):63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Impact Laboratory (SIMLab) and Centre for Advanced Structural Analysis (CASA), Department of Structural EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.SINTEF Materials and ChemistryTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations