Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 205, Issue 2, pp 189–202 | Cite as

Virtual crack closure technique for an interface crack between two transversely isotropic materials

  • Elad Farkash
  • Leslie Banks-Sills
Original Paper

Abstract

The virtual crack closure technique makes use of the forces ahead of the crack tip and the displacement jumps on the crack faces directly behind the crack tip to obtain the energy release rates \({{\mathcal {G}}}_I\) and \({\mathcal {G}}_{II}\). The method was initially developed for cracks in linear elastic, homogeneous and isotropic material and for four noded elements. The method was extended to eight noded and quarter-point elements, as well as bimaterial cracks. For bimaterial cracks, it was shown that \({\mathcal {G}}_I\) and \({\mathcal {G}}_{II}\) depend upon the virtual crack extension \(\varDelta a\). Recently, equations were redeveloped for a crack along an interface between two dissimilar linear elastic, homogeneous and isotropic materials. The stress intensity factors were shown to be independent of \(\varDelta a\). For a better approximation of the Irwin crack closure integral, use of many small elements as part of the virtual crack extension was suggested. In this investigation, the equations for an interface crack between two dissimilar linear elastic, homogeneous and transversely isotropic materials are derived. Auxiliary parameters are used to prescribe an optimal number of elements to be included in the virtual crack extension. In addition, in previous papers, use of elements smaller than the interpenetration zone were rejected. In this study, it is shown that these elements may, indeed, be used.

Keywords

Energy release rate Finite element method Interface crack Interpenetration zone Transversely isotropic VCCT 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Rami Eliasi for his assistance with the finite element analyses.

References

  1. Abaqus/CAE (2014) Version 6.14. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A, Karlsson AM (2006) Obtaining mode mixity for a bimaterial interface crack using the virtual crack closure technique. Int J Fract 141:75–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks-Sills L, Boniface V (2000) Fracture mechanics of an interface crack between a special pair of transversely isotropic materials. In: Chuang TJ, Rudnicki JW (eds) Multiscale deformation and fracture in materials and structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 183–204Google Scholar
  4. Banks-Sills L, Farkash E (2016) A note on the virtual crack closure technique for a bimaterial interface crack. Int J Fract 201:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beuth JL (1996) Separation of crack extension modes in orthotropic delamination models. Int J Fract 77:305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boniface V, Banks-Sills L (2002) Stress intensity factors for finite interface cracks between a special pair of transversely isotropic materials. J Appl Mech 69:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow WT, Atluri SN (1995) Finite element calculation of stress intensity factors for interfacial crack using virtual crack closure integral. Comput Mech 16:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freed Y, Banks-Sills L (2005) A through interface crack between a \(\pm 45^{\circ }\) transversely isotropic pair of materials. Int J Fract 133:1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hemanth D, Shivakumar Aradhya KS, Rama Murthy TS, Govinda Raju N (2005) Strain energy release rates for an interface crack in orthotropic media—a finite element investigation. Eng Fract Mech 72:759–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Irwin GR (1958) Fracture. In: Flugge S (ed) Encyclopedia of physics. Springer, Berlin, pp 551–590 Vol. IVGoogle Scholar
  11. Lekhnitskii SG (1950, in Russian; 1963, in English) Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic body. Holden-Day, San Francisco, translated by Fern PGoogle Scholar
  12. Maple 18.00 (2014) Maplesoft, Waterloo Maple Inc, WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  13. Oneida EK, van der Meulen MCH, Ingraffea AR (2015) Methods for calculating \(G\), \(G_{I}\) and \(G_{II}\) to simulate crack growth in 2D, multiple-material structures. Eng Fract Mech 140:106–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raju IS (1987) Calculation of strain-energy release rates with higher order and singular finite elements. Eng Fract Mech 28:251–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raju IS, Crews JH Jr, Aminpour MA (1988) Convergence of strain energy release rate components for edge-delaminated composite laminates. Eng Fract Mech 30:383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rice JR (1988) Elastic fracture mechanics concepts for interfacial cracks. J Appl Mech 55:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rice JR, Sih GC (1965) Plane problems of cracks in dissimilar media. J Appl Mech 32:418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng Fract Mech 9:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stroh AN (1958) Dislocations and cracks in anisotropic elasticity. Philos Mag 7:625–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun CT, Jih CJ (1987) On strain energy release rates for interfacial cracks in bi-material media. Eng Fract Mech 28:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun CT, Manoharan MG (1989) Strain energy release rates of an interfacial crack between two orthotropic solids. J Compos Mater 23:460–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sun CT, Qian W (1997) The use of finite extension strain energy release rates in fracture of interfacial cracks. Int J Solids Struct 34:2595–2609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Toya M (1992) On mode I and mode II energy release rates of an interface crack. Int J Fract 56:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dreszer Fracture Mechanics Laboratory, School of Mechanical EngineeringTel Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations