Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical model for estimating fracture toughness using the DCDC geometry

  • Brief Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The double cleavage drilled compression (DCDC) geometry is useful for creating large cracks in a material in a controlled manner. Several models for estimating fracture toughness from DCDC measurements have been proposed, but each is suitable for a subset of geometries and material properties. In this work, a series of finite element fracture simulations are performed over a range of sample widths, hole sizes, heights, Young’s moduli, Poisson’s ratios, critical stress intensity factors, and boundary conditions. Analyzing the simulation results, fracture toughness is found to be a simple function of sample width, hole size, and an extrapolated stress at zero crack length obtained from a linear fit of the data. Experimental results in the literature are found to agree with this simple relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen X, Dam MA, Ono K, Mal A, Shen H, Nutt SR, Sheran K, Wudl F (2002) A thermally re-mendable cross-linked polymeric material. Science 295:1698–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AR, Sottos NR, White SR (2010) Self-healing of internal damage in synthetic vascular materials. Adv Mater 22:5159–5163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He MY, Turner MR, Evans AG (1995) Analysis of the double cleavage drilled compression sample for interface fracture energy measurements over a range of mode mixities. Acta Metall et Mater 43:3453–3458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1985) Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: axial splitting and shear failure. J Geophys Res Sol Earth 90(B4):3105–3125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen C (1974) Specimen for fracture mechanics studies on glass. 10th International congress on glass: Kyoto, Japan. Ceramic Society of Japan

  • Michalske TA, Smith WL, Chen EP (1993) Stress intensity calibration for the double cleavage drilled compression specimen. Eng Fract Mech 45:637–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen C, Amirkhizi AV, Nemat-Nasser S (2012) The effect of geometry on fracture strength measurements using DCDC samples. Eng Fract Mech 91:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisted TA, Amirkhizi AV, Nemat-Nasser S (2006) Compre- ssion-induced axial crack propagation in DCDC polymer samples: experiments and modeling. Int J Fract 141:447–457

  • Plaisted TA, Nemat-Nasser S (2007) Quantitative evaluation of fracture, healing and re-healing of a reversibly cross-linked polymer. Acta Mater 55:5684–5696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiderhorn SM, Johnson H, Diness AM, Heuer AH (1974) Fracture of glass in vacuum. J Am Ceram Soc 57:336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant FA9550-08-1-0314 to UC San Diego.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Nielsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nielsen, C., Amirkhizi, A.V. & Nemat-Nasser, S. An empirical model for estimating fracture toughness using the DCDC geometry. Int J Fract 188, 113–118 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-014-9945-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-014-9945-5

Keywords

Navigation