Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 181, Issue 2, pp 241–255 | Cite as

Spacing and failure mechanism of edge fracture in two-layered materials

  • Chunyan Bao
  • C. A. Tang
  • Ming Cai
  • Shibin Tang
Original Paper

Abstract

The phenomenon of edge fractures is analyzed using a fracturing process approach. Such fractures often initiated from the free surface of layered materials, and often terminate at the interface that divides the fractured layer and the matrix layer, or continue to expand along the interface, or create a peel-crack. To understand better the pattern of fractures with different spacing and the fracture mechanism, a double-layer elastic model with the same material properties with a fractured overlying layer subjected to uniaxial tension is simulated firstly. The stress distribution between two adjacent fractures is periodically distributed as a function of the ratio of the fracture spacing to the thickness of the fractured layer (S/t ratio), and homogeneous and heterogeneous material properties are considered in the simulation. The simulation results show that both the stress distribution and the critical value of fracture spacing to layer thickness ratio are affected by material heterogeneity; the S/t ratio of heterogeneous material is much smaller and it is much easier to crack compared with the homogeneous materials. In particular, the fracture saturation mechanism is analyzed by stress state change. Then a numerical simulation is carried out to reveal the fracturing process from micro-fracture formation, propagation, coalescence, nucleation, fracture infilling, fracture saturation, termination, to interface delamination. A fitting curve of the relationship between strain and spacing to layer thickness radio is obtained. It is found that infilling fractures may grow near the bottom or the free surface of the fractured layer by coalescence of micro-fractures and flaws. We also find that fracture spacing in the case of interface delamination is greater than that without interface delamination. A study of stress transition between the two layers on fracture spacing in the fracture process is also carried out, with a focus on stress transfer mode.

Keywords

Edge fracture Heterogeneity  Progressive fracture Numerical modeling  Layered materials 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research in this paper was supported by the CNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China) under contract numbers 50820125405 and 51121005, the 973 Program under contract number 2011CB013503, and the CNSF under contract number 51004020. We appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions provided by two external reviewers.

References

  1. Bai T, Pollard DD, Gao H (2000a) Explanation for fracture spacing in layered materials. Nature 403:753–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai T, Pollard DD, Gao H (2000b) Spacing of edge fractures in layered materials. Int J Fract 103:373–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fischer MP, Gross MR, Engelder T, Greenfield RJ (1995) Finite element analysis of the stress distribution around a pressurized crack in a layered elastic medium: implications for the spacing of fluid-driven joints in bedded sedimentary rock. Tectonophysics 247:49–64 Google Scholar
  4. Gross MR (1993) The origin and spacing of cross joints: examples from the Monterey Formation, Santa Barbara Coastline, California. J Struct Geol 15(6):737–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gross MR, Engelder T (1995) Strain accommodated by brittle failure in adjacent units of the Monterey Formation, U.S.A.: scale effects and evidence for uniform displacement boundary conditions. J Struct Geol 17(9):1303–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helgeson DE, Aydin A (1991) Characteristics of joint propagation across layer interfaces in sedimentary rocks. J Struct Geol 13(8):897–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong AP, Li YN (1997) Theory of crack spacing in concerte pavements. J Eng Mech 123:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iyer K, Podladchikov YY (2009) Transformation-induced jointing as a gauge for interfacial slip and rock strength. Earth Planet Sci Lett 280(1–4):159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ji S, Saruwatari K (1998) A revised model for the relationshipfracture spacing. J Struct Geol 20(11):1495–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lachenbruch AH (1961) Depth and spacing of tension cracks. J Geophys Res 66:4273–4492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mandl G (2005) Rock joints: the mechanical genesis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Nanta R, Moran B (1996) Film cracking and debonding in a coated fiber. Int J Fract 79:351–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tang SB (2009) Mesoscopic numerical model of thermo-hygro cracking process in concrete. Department of Hydraulic, Engineering Doctor 115–160Google Scholar
  14. Tang CA, Zhao W (1997) RFPA2D system for rock failure process analysis. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 16(5):507–508Google Scholar
  15. Tang CA, Zhang YB, Liang ZZ, Xu T, Tham LG, Lindqvist PA, Kou SQ, Liu HY (2006) Fracture spacing in layered materials and pattern transition from parallel to polygonal fractures. Phys Rev E 73(5):056120Google Scholar
  16. Tang CA, Liang ZZ, Zhang YB, Chang X, Tao X, Wang DG, Zhang JX, Liu JS, Zhu WC, ELSworth D (2008) Fracture spacing in layered materials: a new explanation based on two-dimensional failure process modeling. Am J Sci 308(1):49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thouless MD (1990) Crack spacing in brittle films on elastic substrates. J Am Ceram Soc 73:2144–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thouless MD, Olsson E, Gupta A (1992) Cracking of brittle films on elastic substrates. Acta Metall Mater 40(6):1287–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu H, Pollard DD (1995) An experimental study of the relationship between joint spacing and layer thickness. J Struct Geol 17(6):887–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhu WC, Tang CA, Huang ZP, Pang MZ (2005) Numerical simulation on splitting failure mode of rock under static and dynamic loadings. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunyan Bao
    • 1
  • C. A. Tang
    • 1
  • Ming Cai
    • 2
  • Shibin Tang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.Bharti School of EngineeringLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations