International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 164, Issue 1, pp 83–102 | Cite as

Experimental study of the cracking behavior of specimens containing inclusions (under uniaxial compression)

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on the cracking behavior of brittle heterogeneous materials. Unconfined, uniaxial compression tests were conducted on prismatic gypsum specimens containing either one, or two, inclusions. These inclusions were of different strengths, stiffnesses shapes, and sizes. Emphasis was placed on crack coalescence processes associated with specimens containing an inclusion pair, as this was the primary objective of the research. Some observations reported in this study compare well with those of other researchers as the overall cracking sequences are similar. On the other hand, the amount of debonding observed in this study at the inclusion interface is significantly less than what was previously observed. Moreover, the extent of shear crack growth at an inclusion boundary increased substantially in specimens containing two inclusions, compared to those with single inclusions.

Keywords

Inclusions Uniaxial compression High speed camera Debonding Tensile cracks Shear cracks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aulia TB (2000) Strain localization and fracture energy of high-strength concrete under uniaxial compression. LACER 5: 221–240Google Scholar
  2. Baecher GB, Einstein HH (1981) Size effect in rock testing. Geophys Res Lett 8(7): 671–674CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Bienawski ZT (1967) Mechanisms of brittle fracture of rock, part II—experimental studies. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 4: 407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(7): 863–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bombolakis EG (1963) Photoelastic stress analysis of crack propagation within a compressive stress field. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 106 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Brace WF, Bombolakis EG (1963) A note on brittle crack growth in compression. J Geophys Res 68(12): 3709–3713CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Eidelman A, Reches Z (1992) Fractured pebbles—a new stress indicator. Geology 20: 307–310CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodier JN (1933) Concentration of stress around spherical and cylindrical inclusions and flaws. J Appl Mech 1: 39–44Google Scholar
  9. Griffith AA (1920) The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans A 221: 163–198CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen TC (1958) Creep of concrete. Swed Cem Conc Res Inst 33: 48Google Scholar
  11. Hoek E, Bieniawski ZT (1965) Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression. Int J Frac Mech 1: 137–155Google Scholar
  12. Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1985) Brittle failure in compression: splitting, faulting, and brittle-ductile transition. Phil Trans A319: 337–374ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Inglis CE (1913) Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners. Inst Naval Arch 55: 219–230Google Scholar
  14. Irwin GR (1957) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J of App Mech 24: 361–364Google Scholar
  15. Kirsch G (1898) Die Theorie der Elastizität und die Bedürfnisse der Festigkeitslehre. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure 42: 797–802Google Scholar
  16. Ko TY, Einstein HH, Kemeny J (2006) Crack coalescence in brittle material under cyclic loading. In: Proceedings of 41st US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). Goldsen, Colorado, ARMA/USRMS 06-930Google Scholar
  17. Kupfer H, Hilsdorf HK, Rusch H (1969) Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. ACI J Proc 66(8): 656–666Google Scholar
  18. Lo TY, Cui HZ (2004) Effect of porous lightweight aggregate on strength of concrete. Mat Lett 58: 916–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maji AK, Shah SP (1989) Application of acoustic emission and laser holography to study microfracture in concrete. In: Lew HS (eds) Nondestructive testing, ACI SP-112. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, pp 83–109Google Scholar
  20. Maji AK, Shah SP (1990) Mixed mode fracture in compression. In: Elfgren L, Shah SP (eds) Analysis of concrete structures by fracture mechanics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 55–68Google Scholar
  21. Maji AK, Tasdemir MA, Shah SP (1991) Mixed mode crack propagation in quasi brittle material. Eng Frac Mech 38(2/3): 1058–1107Google Scholar
  22. Mitsui K, Li Z, Lange DA, Shah SP (1994) Relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of the paste-aggregate interface. ACI Mat J 91(1): 30–39Google Scholar
  23. Nelson RA (1968) Modelling a jointed rock mass. MIT, M.Sc. thesisGoogle Scholar
  24. Nesetova V, Lajtai EZ (1973) Fracture from compressive stress concentrations around elastic flaws. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 10: 265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neville AM (1997) Aggregate bond and modulus of elasticity of concrete. ACI Mat J 94(1): 71–74Google Scholar
  26. Reyes O, Einstein HH (1991) Failure mechanism of fractured rock—a fracture coalescence model. In: Wittke W (ed) Proceedings of 7th international congress of rock mechanics. Aachen, Germany, pp 333–340Google Scholar
  27. Shen B, Stephansson O, Einstein HH, Ghahreman B (1995) Coalescence of fractures under shear stress experiments. J Geophys Res 100(6): 5975–5990CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Tasdemir MA, Maji AK, Shah SP (1989) Crack propagation in concrete under compression. J Eng Mech 116(5): 1058–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor MA, Broms BB (1964) Shear bond strength between coarse aggregate and cement paste or mortar. Proc ACI J 61(8): 937–957Google Scholar
  30. Wong LNY, Einstein HH (2009) Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: part 2—microscopic observations and interpretation. Rock Mech and Rock Eng 42: 475–511CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Wong LNY, Einstein HH (2009) Using high speed video imaging in the study of cracking processes in rock. Geo Test J 32(2): 164–180Google Scholar
  32. Zaitsev YB, Wittmann FH (1981) Simulation of crack propagation and failure of concrete. Mat Struc 14(83): 357–365Google Scholar
  33. Zhang MH, Gjørv OE (1990) Microstructure of the interfacial zone between lightweight aggregate and cement paste. Cem Conc Res 20(4): 610–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GeoDesign, Inc.MiddleburyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations