Abstract
The paper presents a new approach for shape optimisation of structures with residual strength as the design objective. It must be emphasized that flaws are inevitably present in most structures, and hence the influence of cracks on optimised shapes needs to be investigated. Numerical simulation of cracks using the finite element method requires a very fine mesh to model the singularity at crack tip. This makes fracture calculations computationally intensive. Furthermore, for a damage tolerance based optimisation numerous cracks are to be considered along the structural boundary, and fracture analysis needs to be repeated for each crack at every iteration, thus making the whole process extremely computationally expensive for practical purpose. Moreover, the lack of information concerning crack size, orientation, and location makes the formulation of the optimisation problem difficult. As a result, little attention has been paid to date to consider fracture parameters in the optimisation objective. To address this, the paper presents a methodology for the shape optimisation of structures with strength and durability as the design objectives. In particular, the damage tolerance optimisation is illustrated via the problem of optimal design of a ‘cutout in a rectangular block under biaxial loading’. A parametric shape representation has been used to describe the problem geometry. Damage tolerance based optimisation was performed using nonlinear programming algorithms, and NE-NASTRAN was used for finite element analysis. The first order mathematical programming algorithms, viz: the Broydon–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) and the Fletcher–Reeves (Conjugate Direction) Methods were evaluated as the potential algorithms for optimising the residual strength in the presence of flaws. Another recently developed Sequential Unconstrained Minimisation Technique (SUMT), based on an exterior penalty function method and especially suited for large problems, was also investigated for fracture based optimisation. The effects of the orientation and the number of boundary cracks on the optimal solutions were also studied. It has been shown that the residual strength optimised shapes can be different from the corresponding and commonly adopted stress optimised solution. This emphasises the need to explicitly consider residual strength as the design objective. In all cases a significant reduction in the maximum stress intensity factor was achieved with the generation of a ‘near’ uniform fracture critical surface. The design space near the optimal region was found to be relatively flat. This is beneficial as a significant structural performance enhancement is important rather than precise identification of the local/global optimum solution. The optimal solutions obtained using the nonlinear programming algorithms were compared against those obtained in the literature using a heuristic optimisation method (Biological algorithm). The results obtained using the two methods, employing inherently different (gradient-based and gradient-less) algorithms, were found to agree very well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arora JS (1989) Introduction to optimum design. McGraw-Hill, New York
Banichuk N (1998) Optimal design of quasi-brittle elastic bodies with cracks. Mech Struct Mach 26(4): 365–376. doi:10.1080/08905459808945500
Banichuk NV, Neittaanmaki P (2007) On structural optimization with incomplete information. Mech Des Struct Mach 35(1): 75–95. doi:10.1080/15397730601184626
Banichuk NV, Ivanova SY, Makeev EV, Sinitsin AV (2005) Optimal shape design of axisymmetric shells for crack initiation and propagation under cyclic loading. Mech Des Struct Mach 33(2): 253–269. doi:10.1081/SME-2000118709
Broydon CG (1970) The convergence of class of double rank minimization algorithms, parts I and II. J Inst Math Appl 6: 76–90. doi:10.1093/imamat/6.1.76
Cheng GD, Fu B (1988) Optimization of continuum with crack. In: IUTAM symposium on structural optimization, Melbourne, Australia
Das R, Jones R (2009) Damage tolerance based design optimisation of a fuel flow vent hole in an aircraft structure. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(3): 245–265. doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0278-8
Das R, Jones R (2009) Development of a 3D Biological method for fatigue life based optimisation and its application to structural shape design. Int J Fatigue 31(2): 309–321. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.08.003
Das R, Jones R, Xie YM (2005) Design of structures for optimal static strength using ESO. Eng Fail Anal 12(1): 61–80. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.05.002
Das R, Jones R, Peng D (2006) Optimisation of damage tolerant structures using a 3D Biological algorithm. Eng Fail Anal 13(3): 362–379. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.02.013
Das R, Jones R, Chandra S (2007) Damage tolerance based shape design of a stringer cutout using evolutionary structural optimisation. Eng Fail Anal 14(1): 118–137. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.11.008
Davidon WC (1959) Variable metric method for minimization. Argone National Laboratory, University of Chicago, Report no. ANL-5990 Rev
Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12: 214–219
Fletcher R (1970) A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput J 13: 317–322. doi:10.1093/comjnl/13.3.317
Fletcher R, Powell MJD (1963) A rapidly convergent descent method for minimization. Comput J 6: 163–180
Fletcher R, Reeves CM (1964) Function minimization by conjugate gradients. Comput J 7(2): 149–154. doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.149
Goldfarb D (1970) A family of variable metric methods derived by variational means. Math Comput 24: 23–36. doi:10.2307/2004873
Jih J, Hajela P (1991) Computational efficiency aspects in boundary element based structural shape optimization. Eng Optim 17: 161–173. doi:10.1080/03052159108941068
Jones R, Peng D (2002) A simple method for computing the stress intensity factors for cracks at notches. Eng Fail Anal 9: 683–702. doi:10.1016/S1350-6307(02)00007-9
Jones R, Molent L, Pitt S (1999) Study of multi-site damage of fuselage lap joints. Theor Appl Fract Mech 32(2): 81–100. doi:10.1016/S0167-8442(99)00029-4
Jones R, Chaperon P, Heller M (2002) Structural optimisation with fracture strength constraints. Eng Fract Mech 69: 1403–1423. doi:10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00006-1
Jones R, Peng D, Pitt S, Wallbrink C (2004) Weight functions, CTOD, and related solutions for cracks at notches. Eng Fail Anal 11(1): 79–114. doi:10.1016/S1350-6307(03)00060-8
Kaye R, Heller M (2000) Investigation of shape optimisation for the design of life extension options for an F/A-18 airframe FS 470 bulkhead. J Strain Anal 35(6): 493–505. doi:10.1243/0309324001514251
Khatree R (1996) Robust parameter design: a response surface approach. J Qual Technol 28: 187–198
Kristensen ES, Madsen NF (1976) On the optimum shape of fillets in plates subjected to multiple in plane loading cases. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10: 1007–1019. doi:10.1002/nme.1620100504
Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J 11: 431–441
Nishioka T, Atluri SN (1983) Analytical solutions for embedded elliptical cracks, and finite element alternating method for elliptical surface cracks, subjected to arbitrary loadings. Eng Fract Mech 17(3): 247–268. doi:10.1016/0013-7944(83)90032-2
Powell MJD (1964) An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Comput J 7(4): 303–307
Shanno DF (1970) Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Math Comput 24: 647–656. doi:10.2307/2004840
Vanderplaats GN (1984) Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design: with application. McGraw-Hill, New York
Vanderplaats GN (2000) Very large scale optimization. In: Proceedings of AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Long Beach, CA
Waldman W, Heller M, Chen GX (2001) Optimal free form shapes for shoulder fillets in flat plates under tension and bending. Int J Fatigue 23(23): 509–523. doi:10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00011-1
Zangwill IW (1969) Nonlinear programming: a unified approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, R., Jones, R. Designing cutouts for optimum residual strength in plane structural elements. Int J Fract 156, 129–153 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9352-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9352-5