Skip to main content
Log in

The Clock Paradox in a Static Homogeneous Gravitational Field1

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

The gedanken experiment of the clock paradox is solved exactly using the general relativistic equations for a static homogeneous gravitational field. We demonstrate that the general and special relativistic clock paradox solutions are identical and in particular that they are identical for finite acceleration. Practical expressions are obtained for proper time and coordinate time by using the destination distance as the key observable parameter. This solution provides a formal demonstration of the identity between the special and general relativistic clock paradox with finite acceleration and where proper time is assumed to be the same in both formalisms. By solving the equations of motion for a freely falling clock in a static homogeneous field elapsed times are calculated for realistic journeys to the stars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), pp. 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2. C. Moller, The Theory of Relativity (Claredon, Oxford, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3. L. Iorio, “An analytical treatment of the clock paradox in the framework of the special and general theories of relativity,” Found. Phys. Lett. 18, 1–19 (2005).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. 4. A. Einstein, “On the influence of gravitation on the propagation of light,” Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 35, 898 (1911).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. 5. A. Einstein, “On the relativity principle and the conclusions drawn from it,” Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Electronik 4, 411–462 (1907) and The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1989), Anna Beck, translator, pp. 252–307.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7. F. Rohrlich, “The principle of equivalence,” Ann. Phys. (New York) 22, 169–191 (1963).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. 8. D. Tilbrook, “General coordinatisations of the flat space-time of constant proper-acceleration,” Australian J. Phys. 50, 851–868 (1997).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. 9. H. Lass, “Accelerating frames of reference and the clock paradox,” Am. J. Phys. 31, 274–276 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. 10. W. Rindler, “Kruskal space and homogeneously accelerated frame,” Am. J. Phys. 34, 1174–1178 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11. E. Desloge, “Nonequivalence of a uniform accelerating frame and a frame at rest in a uniform gravitational field,” Am. J. Phys. 57, 1121–1125 (1989).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Preston Jones or Lucas F. Wanex.

Additional information

1 Both authors contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, P., Wanex, L. The Clock Paradox in a Static Homogeneous Gravitational Field1. Found Phys Lett 19, 75–85 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10702-006-1850-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10702-006-1850-3

Key words:

Navigation