Abstract
We discuss a recent work by J. Lawrence et al. [arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793] criticizing relational quantum mechanics (RQM) and based on a famous nonlocality theorem Going back to Greenberger Horne and Zeilinger (GHZ). Here, we show that the claims presented in this recent work are unjustified and we debunk the analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No Data associated in the manuscript.
References
Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Phys. 35, 1637 (1996)
Rovelli, C.: Helgoland: making sense of the quantum revolution. Riverhead Books, New York (2021)
Laudisa, F., Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford (2019)
Di Biagio, A., Rovelli, C.: Stable facts, relative facts. Found. Phys. 51, 30 (2021)
Cavalcanti, E.G., Di Biagio, A., Rovelli, C., On the consistency of relative facts (2023) arxiv.org/abs/2305.07343
Lawrence, J., Markiewicz, M., Źukowski, M.: Relative facts do not exist: relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics (2022) arXiv:arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793
Brukner, Č.: Qubits are not observers-a no-go theorem (2021) arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2107.03513v1
Pienaar, J.: A quintet of quandaries: five no-go theorems for relational quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 51, 97 (2021)
Di Biagio, A., Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics is about facts, not states: a reply to Pienaar and Brukner. Found. Phys. 52, 62 (2021)
Drezet, A.: In defense of relational quantum mechanics: a note on ‘Qubits are not observers’ (2022). arxiv.org/abs/2202.02615
Drezet, A.: Can a Bohmian be a Rovellian for all practical purposes? Found. Phys. 51, 97 (2023)
Lawrence, J., Markiewicz, M., Źukowski, M.: Relative facts do not exist: relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics. Response to the critique by Aurélien Drezet (2022).. arxiv.org/abs/2210.09025
Lawrence, J., Markiewicz, M., Źukowski, M.: Relational quantum mechanics is still incompatible with quantum mechanics (2023). arxiv.org/abs/2310.18008
Greenberger, D., Horne, A.M., Zeilinger, A.: Going beyond Bell’s theorem. In: Kafatos, M. (ed.) Bell’s theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe, pp. 69–72. Springer, Dordrecht (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I am the sole author of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The Author declares no competing interest for this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Drezet, A. A Critical Analysis of ‘Relative Facts Do Not Exist: Relational Quantum Mechanics Is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics’ by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski. Found Phys 54, 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00743-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00743-5