Skip to main content
Log in

The Born Rule and Time-Reversal Symmetry of Quantum Equations of Motion

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was repeatedly underlined in literature that quantum mechanics cannot be considered a closed theory if the Born Rule is postulated rather than derived from the first principles. In this work the Born Rule is derived from the time-reversal symmetry of quantum equations of motion. The derivation is based on a simple functional equation that takes into account properties of probability, as well as the linearity and time-reversal symmetry of quantum equations of motion. The derivation presented in this work also allows to determine certain limits to applicability of the Born Rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Born, M.: Zur quantenmechanik der stossvorgange. Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantentheorie. Springer, Berlin (1931)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Deutsch, David: Quantum theory of probability and decisions. Proc. R. Soc. London A455, 3129 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zurek, W.H.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 120404 (2003). Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zurek, W.H.: Probabilities from entanglement, Born’s rule from envariance. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052105 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zurek, W.H.: Entanglement symmetry, amplitudes, and probabilities: inverting Born’s rule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250402 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Landsman, N.P.: Compendium of Quantum Physics. In: Weinert, F., Hentschel, K., Greenberger, D., Falkenburg, B. (eds.), Springer, New York (2008), ISBN 3-540-70622-4 (“The conclusion seems to be that no generally accepted derivation of the Born rule has been given to date, but this does not imply that such a derivation is impossible in principle”)

  9. Aerts, Sven: The Born rule from a consistency requirement on hidden measurements in complex Hilbert Space. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44(7), 999–1009 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lesovik, G.B.: Derivation of the Born rule from the unitarity of quantum evolution, arXiv:1411.6992v2 [quant-ph] (2014)

  11. Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 4, 5. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to G. B. Lesovik of the Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chernogolovka, and Yu. M. Belousov of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksey V. Ilyin.

Appendix

Appendix

Let us consider the Schroedinger equation for an arbitrary state vector \(|\psi \rangle \):

$$\begin{aligned} \hat{E}|\psi \rangle =\hat{H}|\psi \rangle , \end{aligned}$$
(17)

where \(\hat{E}=i\hbar \tfrac{\partial }{\partial t}\)—is the energy operator, \(\hat{H}\)—is time-independent Hamiltonian.

Upon substituting \(t\rightarrow -t\) in (17) one obtains

$$\begin{aligned} -\hat{E}|\psi ^{-}\rangle =\hat{H}|\psi ^{-}\rangle , \end{aligned}$$
(18)

where \(|\psi ^{-}\rangle =|\psi (\mathbf {r},-t)\rangle \). Equation (18) does not coincide with the Schroedinger equation (17) due to the “minus” sign on its left side. In order to return to the correct equation of motion while retaining time-reversal, it is necessary to apply the operation of Hermitian conjugation to Eq. (18):

$$\begin{aligned} \langle \psi ^{-}|\hat{E}=\langle \psi ^{-}|\hat{H}, \end{aligned}$$
(19)

where it is taken into account that the Hamiltonian is a Hermitian operator \(\hat{H}^{+}=\hat{H}\) while the energy operator is anti-Hermitian \(\hat{E}^{+}=-\hat{E}\) because \(i\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\) changes its sign under complex conjugation.

Thus, if we demand that the reversed solution should satisfy the Schroedinger equation then time reversal of a quantum state should result in simultaneous replacement of each ket \(|\psi \rangle \) with corresponding bra \(\langle \psi ^{-}|\). This operation applied to plane wave (1) results in complex conjugation of amplitude \(S\rightarrow S^{*}\), which is taken into account in Eq. (3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilyin, A.V. The Born Rule and Time-Reversal Symmetry of Quantum Equations of Motion. Found Phys 46, 845–851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0006-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0006-y

Keywords

Navigation