Abstract
It was repeatedly underlined in literature that quantum mechanics cannot be considered a closed theory if the Born Rule is postulated rather than derived from the first principles. In this work the Born Rule is derived from the time-reversal symmetry of quantum equations of motion. The derivation is based on a simple functional equation that takes into account properties of probability, as well as the linearity and time-reversal symmetry of quantum equations of motion. The derivation presented in this work also allows to determine certain limits to applicability of the Born Rule.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Born, M.: Zur quantenmechanik der stossvorgange. Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926)
von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantentheorie. Springer, Berlin (1931)
Deutsch, David: Quantum theory of probability and decisions. Proc. R. Soc. London A455, 3129 (1999)
Zurek, W.H.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 120404 (2003). Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)
Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)
Zurek, W.H.: Probabilities from entanglement, Born’s rule from envariance. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052105 (2005)
Zurek, W.H.: Entanglement symmetry, amplitudes, and probabilities: inverting Born’s rule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250402 (2011)
Landsman, N.P.: Compendium of Quantum Physics. In: Weinert, F., Hentschel, K., Greenberger, D., Falkenburg, B. (eds.), Springer, New York (2008), ISBN 3-540-70622-4 (“The conclusion seems to be that no generally accepted derivation of the Born rule has been given to date, but this does not imply that such a derivation is impossible in principle”)
Aerts, Sven: The Born rule from a consistency requirement on hidden measurements in complex Hilbert Space. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44(7), 999–1009 (2005)
Lesovik, G.B.: Derivation of the Born rule from the unitarity of quantum evolution, arXiv:1411.6992v2 [quant-ph] (2014)
Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 4, 5. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2001)
Acknowledgments
The author is thankful to G. B. Lesovik of the Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chernogolovka, and Yu. M. Belousov of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Let us consider the Schroedinger equation for an arbitrary state vector \(|\psi \rangle \):
where \(\hat{E}=i\hbar \tfrac{\partial }{\partial t}\)—is the energy operator, \(\hat{H}\)—is time-independent Hamiltonian.
Upon substituting \(t\rightarrow -t\) in (17) one obtains
where \(|\psi ^{-}\rangle =|\psi (\mathbf {r},-t)\rangle \). Equation (18) does not coincide with the Schroedinger equation (17) due to the “minus” sign on its left side. In order to return to the correct equation of motion while retaining time-reversal, it is necessary to apply the operation of Hermitian conjugation to Eq. (18):
where it is taken into account that the Hamiltonian is a Hermitian operator \(\hat{H}^{+}=\hat{H}\) while the energy operator is anti-Hermitian \(\hat{E}^{+}=-\hat{E}\) because \(i\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\) changes its sign under complex conjugation.
Thus, if we demand that the reversed solution should satisfy the Schroedinger equation then time reversal of a quantum state should result in simultaneous replacement of each ket \(|\psi \rangle \) with corresponding bra \(\langle \psi ^{-}|\). This operation applied to plane wave (1) results in complex conjugation of amplitude \(S\rightarrow S^{*}\), which is taken into account in Eq. (3).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ilyin, A.V. The Born Rule and Time-Reversal Symmetry of Quantum Equations of Motion. Found Phys 46, 845–851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0006-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0006-y