Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Local Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A local interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented. Its main ingredients are: first, a label attached to one of the “virtual” paths in the path integral formalism, determining the output for measurement of position or momentum; second, a mathematical model for spin states, equivalent to the path integral formalism for point particles in space time, with the corresponding label. The mathematical machinery of orthodox quantum mechanics is maintained, in particular amplitudes of probability and Born’s rule; therefore, Bell’s type inequalities theorems do not apply. It is shown that statistical correlations for pairs of particles with entangled spins have a description completely equivalent to the two slit experiment, that is, interference (wave like behaviour) instead of non locality gives account of the process. The interpretation is grounded in the experimental evidence of a point like character of electrons, and in the hypothetical existence of a wave like, the de Broglie, companion system. A correspondence between the extended Hilbert spaces of hidden physical states and the orthodox quantum mechanical Hilbert space shows the mathematical equivalence of both theories. Paradoxical behaviour with respect to the action reaction principle is analysed, and an experimental set up, modified two slit experiment, proposed to look for the companion system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of course, when we look we disturb the state of the system. The point is if its corpuscular character is preserved or not.

  2. In [34] the Wigner function is interpreted (and measured) as a difference of probabilities.

References

  1. Born, M.: On the quantum mechanics of collisions. Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Heisenberg, W.: The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1930)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. von Newmann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feynman, R.P., Hibbs, A.R.: Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. McGraw–Hill, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein, A.: Physics and reality. J. Franklin Inst. 221, 349–382 (1936)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “Hidden” variables. I and II. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–192 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Everett, H.: “Relative State” formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bunge, M. (ed.): Quantum Theory and Reality. Springer, Berlin (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartle, J.B.: Quantum mechanics of individual systems. Am. J. Phys. 36(8), 704–712 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ballentine, L.E.: The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 380–385 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. d’Espagnat, B.: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn, Addison Wesley, New York, ISBN 0-8133-4087-X (1976)

  12. Gell-Mann, M.: The Nature of the Physical Universe: The (1976) Nobel Conference, p. 29. Wiley, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wheller, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.): Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ballentine, L.E.: In: Roth, L.M., Inomata, A. (eds.) Fundamental Questions in Quantum Physics, pp. 65–75. Gordon and Breach, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Home, D., Whitaker, M.A.B.: The ensemble interpretation and context-dependence in quantum systems. Phys. Lett. A 115, 81–83 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibbons, P.: Particles and Paradoxes: The Limits of Quantum Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) ISBN 9780521523387

  18. Penrose, R.: The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989) ISBN 0-19-851973-7

  19. Omnes, R.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994) ISBN 9780691036694

  20. Pavon, M.: Stochastic mechanics and the Feynman integral. J. Math. Phys. 41, 6060–6078 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Belifante, J.: A Survey of Hidden Variables Theories. Pergamon, Oxford (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ballentine, L.E.: Foundations of quantum mechanics since the Bell inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 55, 785–792 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Bell, J.S.: In: Miller, A.I. (ed.) Sixty-two Years of Uncertainty, pp. 17–31. Plenum press, New York (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Home, D., Whitaker, M.A.B.: Ensemble interpretations of quantum mechanics: a modern perspective. Phys. Rep. 210(4), 223–317 (1992)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Cabello, A.: Bibliographic guide to the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information. arXiv:quant-ph/0012089 (2004)

  26. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1(3), 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–883 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Zeilinger, A.: Bells theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58(12), 1131–1142 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Mermin, N.D.: Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(3), 803–816 (1993)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental test of bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49(25), 1804–1807 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Popper, K.: In: Korner, Price, (eds.) Thepo Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability and of the Quantum Theory: Observations and interpretations, pp. 65–70. Butters Worth Scientific Publications, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lopez, C.:Vacuum, S3: International Workshop on Symmetries, Special functions and Superintegrability (Meeting to Honour Professor Mariano del Olmo in his 60th Birthday), Valladolid (Spain), July 10–11, 2014

  34. Banaszek, K., Radzewicz, C., Wodkiewicz, K., Krasinski, J.S.: Direct measurement of the Wigner function by photon counting. Phys. Rev. A 60, 674–677 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wigner, E.P.: On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Groenewold, H.J.: On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics. Physica 12(7), 405–460 (1946)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Moyal, J.E.: Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45(01), 99–124 (1949)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Braffort, P., Spighel, M., Tzara, C.: Quelques consequences de la theorie de l’action a distance en electrodynamique classique. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris. 239, 157–160, 925 (1954)

  39. Sokolov, A.A., Tumanov, V.: The uncertainty relation and fluctuation theory. Sov. Phys.- JETP 3(6), 958–959 (1956)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. de Broglie, L.: Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory. Ann. Fond. Louis Broglie 12(4), 1–23 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nelson, E.: Derivation of the Schroedinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics. Phys. Rev. 150, 1079–1085 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Grossing, G.: Sub-quantum thermodynamics as a basis of emergent quantum mechanics. Entropy 12(9), 1975–2044 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. V. I. Sbitnev : Physical vacuum is a special superfluid medium. arXiv:1501.06763 (2015)

  44. Bohr, N., Kramers, H.A., Slater, J.C.: The quantum theory of radiation. Philos. Mag. 47, 785–802 (1924)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from research Project MAT2011-22719 is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics and Mathematics, Facultad de Ciencias, UAH, 28871, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    Carlos Lopez

Authors
  1. Carlos Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Lopez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopez, C. A Local Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Found Phys 46, 484–504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9976-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9976-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation