Abstract
In the standard mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, measurement is an additional, exceptional fundamental process rather than an often complex, but ordinary process which happens also to serve a particular epistemic function: during a measurement of one of its properties which is not already determined by a preceding measurement, a measured system, even if closed, is taken to change its state discontinuously rather than continuously as is usual. Many, including Bell, have been concerned about the fundamental role thus given to measurement in the foundation of the theory. Others, including the early Bohr and Schwinger, have suggested that quantum mechanics naturally incorporates the unavoidable uncontrollable disturbance of physical state that accompanies any local measurement without the need for an exceptional fundamental process or a special measurement theory. Disturbance is unanalyzable for Bohr, but for Schwinger it is due to physical interactions’ being borne by fundamental particles having discrete properties and behavior which is beyond physical control. Here, Schwinger’s approach is distinguished from more well known treatments of measurement, with the conclusion that, unlike most, it does not suffer under Bell’s critique of quantum measurement. Finally, Schwinger’s critique of measurement theory is explicated as a call for a deeper investigation of measurement processes that requires the use of a theory of quantum fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The role of a consciousness is sometimes also mentioned, but such a characterization is then not purely physical and is not considered here.
References
Von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Julius Springer (1932) English translation: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Ch. V, Sect. 4. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1955)
Bell, J.S.: Against measurement. In: Miller, A.I. (ed.) Sixty-TwoYears of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, p. 17. Plenum Press, New York (1990)
Jaeger, G.S.: Overcoming conceptual imprecision in quantum measurement theory: measurement and macroscopicity. In: Bell, M., Gao, S. (eds.) Quantum Nonlocality and Reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015). (To appear)
Schwinger, J.: Quantum Mechanics: Symbolism of Atomic Measurements. In: Englert, B.G. (ed.), Berlin: Springer (2001)
Stein, H.: A maximal impossibility theorem in the quantum theory of measurement. In: Cohen, R.S., Home, M.A., Stachel, J. (eds.) Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-Distance: Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
Bohr, N.: The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Supplement to Nature, April 14, 1928, p. 580 (1928)
Plotnitsky, A.: Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking. Spinger, Heidelberg (2010)
Heisenberg, W.: The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1930)
Bohr, N.: Causality and complementarity. In: Bohr, N. (ed.) Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, pp. 1–7. Interscience Publishers, New York (1963)
Bell, J.S.: Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality. J. Phys., tome 42, colloque C2, supplément au No. 3, 41 (1981)
Bell, J.S.: On wave packet reduction in the Coleman-Hepp model. Helv. Phys. Acta 48, 93 (1975)
Aharonov, Y., Bohm, D.: Time in the quantum theory and the uncertainty relation for time and energy. Phys. Rev. 122, 1649 (1961)
Jaeger, G.S.: Macroscopic realism and quantum measurement: measurers as a natural kind. Phys. Scr. T163, 014017 (2014)
Jaeger, G.S.: What in the (quantum) world is macroscopic? Am. J. Phys. 82, 896 (2014)
Bohr, N.: Essays 1958–1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge. Wiley, New York (1963)
Shimony, A.: Comments on Leggett’s “macroscopic realism”. In: Healey, R.A., Hellman, G. (eds.) Quantum Measurement: Beyond Paradox, p. 29. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (1998)
Peres, A.: Can we undo quantum measurements? Phys. Rev. D 22, 879 (1980)
Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P.: The quantum theory of measurement, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Araki, H., Yanase, M.: Measurement of quantum mechanical operators. Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960)
Wigner, E.P.: The problem of measurement. Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963)
Sen, R.N.: Causality, Measurement Theory and the Differentiable Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
D’ Espagnat, B.: Two remarks on the theory of measurement. Nuovo Cimento, 4: 828 (1966)
D’ Espagnat, B.: Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. Benjamin, Menlo Park (1971)
Fine, A.: Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem. Phys. Rev. 2, 2783 (1970)
Shimony, A.: Approximate measurement in quantum mechanics. II. Phys. Rev. D 9, 2321 (1974)
Busch, P., Shimony, A.: Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem for unsharp observables. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. B27, 397 (1996)
Schrödinger, E.: Die gegenwaertige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935)
Bacciagaluppi, G., Hemmo, M.: Modal interpretations, decoherence, and measurements. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 27, 239 (1996)
Cushing, J.T.: Foundational problems and methodological lessons from quantum field theory. In: Brown, H.R., Harré, R. (eds.) Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1988)
MacKinnon, E.: Schwinger and the ontology of quantum field theory. Found. Sci. 12, 259 (2007)
Julian Schwinger Papers (Collection 371), Department of Special Collections, University Research Library, University of California, Los Angeles. Quoted. In: Mehra, J., Milton, K.A.: Climbing the mountain. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2003)
Schweber, S.: The sources of Schwinger’s Green’s functions. Proc. PNAS 102, 7783 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaeger, G. Measurement and Fundamental Processes in Quantum Mechanics. Found Phys 45, 806–819 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9893-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9893-6