# Dynamical Correspondence in a Generalized Quantum Theory

## Abstract

In order to figure out why quantum physics needs the complex Hilbert space, many attempts have been made to distinguish the C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras in more general classes of abstractly defined Jordan algebras (JB- and JBW-algebras). One particularly important distinguishing property was identified by Alfsen and Shultz and is the existence of a dynamical correspondence. It reproduces the dual role of the selfadjoint operators as observables and generators of dynamical groups in quantum mechanics. In the paper, this concept is extended to another class of nonassociative algebras, arising from recent studies of the quantum logics with a conditional probability calculus and particularly of those that rule out third-order interference. The conditional probability calculus is a mathematical model of the Lüders–von Neumann quantum measurement process, and third-order interference is a property of the conditional probabilities which was discovered by Sorkin (Mod Phys Lett A 9:3119–3127, 1994) and which is ruled out by quantum mechanics. It is shown then that the postulates that a dynamical correspondence exists and that the square of any algebra element is positive still characterize, in the class considered, those algebras that emerge from the selfadjoint parts of C*-algebras equipped with the Jordan product. Within this class, the two postulates thus result in ordinary quantum mechanics using the complex Hilbert space or, vice versa, a genuine generalization of quantum theory must omit at least one of them.

## Keywords

Order derivations Positive groups Operator algebras Lie algebras Foundations of quantum mechanics## Mathematics Subject Classifications

46L70 81P10## References

- 1.Alfsen, E.M., Shultz, F.W.: On orientation and dynamics in operator algebras (Part I). Commun. Math. Phys.
**194**, 87–108 (1998)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 2.Alfsen, E.M., Shultz, F.W.: State Spaces of Operator Algebras: Basic Theory, Orientations and C*-products. Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Alfsen, E.M., Shultz, F.W.: Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras. Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Baez, J.C.: The octonions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc.
**39**, 145–205 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 5.Barnum, H., Müller, M.P., Ududec, C.: Higher-order interference and single-system postulates characterizing quantum theory. New J. Phys.
**16**, 123029 (2014)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 6.Bunce, L.J., Wright, J.D.M.: Continuity and linear extensions of quantum measures on Jordan operator algebras. Math. Scand.
**64**, 300–306 (1989)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 7.Connes, A.: Characterisation des espaces vectoriels ordonnes sousjacent aux algebres de von Neumann. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)
**24**, 121–155 (1974)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 8.Evans, D., Hanche-Olsen, H.: The generators of positive semigroups. J. Func. Anal.
**32**, 207–212 (1979)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 9.Jordan, P., von Neumann, J., Wigner, E.: On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism. Ann. Math.
**35**, 29–64 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Niestegge, G.: Non-Boolean probabilities and quantum measurement. J. Phys. A
**34**, 6031–6042 (2001)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 11.Niestegge, G.: A representation of quantum mechanics in order-unit spaces. Found. Phys.
**38**, 783–795 (2008)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 12.Niestegge, G.: Conditional probability, three-slit experiments, and the Jordan algebra structure of quantum mechanics. Adv. Math. Phys.
**2012**, 156573 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 13.Niestegge, G.: A generalized quantum theory. Found. Phys.
**44**, 1216–1229 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 14.Sorkin, R.D.: Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory. Mod. Phys. Lett. A
**9**, 3119–3127 (1994)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar