Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Unification of the State with the Dynamical Law

  • Lee Smolin
Article

Abstract

We address the question of why particular laws were selected for the universe, by proposing a mechanism for laws to evolve. Normally in physical theories, timeless laws act on time-evolving states. We propose that this is an approximation, good on time scales shorter than cosmological scales, beyond which laws and states are merged into a single entity that evolves in time. Furthermore the approximate distinction between laws and states, when it does emerge, is dependent on the initial conditions. These ideas are illustrated in a simple matrix model.

Keywords

Evolution of laws of physics Matrix models Evolving Laws 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This worked evolved from joint work with Roberto Mangabeira Unger [9, 10, 11, 12, 13] on the implications of the hypothesis that the laws of physics evolve, and I am very grateful to him for many suggestions and discussions as well as for critical comments on this manuscript. I am grateful also to Andrew Albrecht, Andrzej Banbursk, Sabine Hossenfelder and Matthew Johnson for perceptive comments on the manuscript. I am also grateful to FQXi and the Templeton Foundation for generous support of my research. Research at Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics is supported in part by the Government of Canada through NSERC and by the Province of Ontario through MRI.

References

  1. 1.
    Peirce, C.S.: The architecture of theories. In: Buchler, J. (ed.) The Monist, 1891, reprinted in Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Dover, New York (1955)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smolin, L.: Did the universe evolve? Classical and Quantum Gravity 9, 173–191 (1992)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smolin, L.: The status of cosmological natural selection. In: Vaas, R. (ed.) Beyond the Big Bang. Springer Verlag (to appear). hep-th/0612185
  4. 4.
    Smolin, L.: Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle. In: Carr, B., et al. (eds.) Contribution to “Universe or Multiverse”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. arXiv:hep-th/0407213
  5. 5.
    Smolin, L.: Cosmological natural selection as the explanation for the complexity of the universe, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications Special Issue: Complexity and Criticality. In: Alstrom, P., Bohr, T., Christensen, K., Flyvbjerg, H., Jensen, M.H., Lautrup, B., Sneppen, K. (eds.) In Memory of Per Bak. (1947–2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smolin, L.: Using neutrons stars and primordial black holes to test theories of quantum gravity. astro-ph/9712189
  7. 7.
    Smolin, L.: On the fate of black hole singularities and the parameters of the standard model. gr-qc/9404011
  8. 8.
    Smolin, L.: Life of the Cosmos. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Unger, R.M., Smolin, L.: The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smolin, L.: Time Reborn: from the crisis in physics to the future of the universe. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smolin, L.: Temporal naturalism. In: Grosholz, E. (ed.) Invited Contribution for a Special Issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, on Time and Cosmology. arXiv:1310.8539
  12. 12.
    Smolin, L.: Time, laws and the future of cosmology. Phys. Today 67(3), 38 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smolin, L.: The unique universe: against the timeless multiverse. Phys. World 21–26 ( 2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smolin, L.: Matrix universality of gauge and gravitational dynamics (2008). arXiv:0803.2926

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations