Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion
The best developed formulation of closed system quantum theory that handles multiple-time statements, is the consistent (or decoherent) histories approach. The most important weaknesses of the approach is that it gives rise to many different consistent sets, and it has been argued that a complete interpretation should be accompanied with a natural mechanism leading to a (possibly) unique preferred consistent set. The existence of multiple consistent sets becomes more problematic because it allows the existence of contrary inferences . We analyse the conceptual difficulties that arise from the existence of multiple consistent sets and provide a suggestion for a natural set selection criterion. This criterion does not lead to a unique physical consistent set, however it evades the existence of consistent sets with contrary inferences. The criterion is based on the concept of preclusion and the requirement that probability one propositions and their inferences should be non-contextual. The allowed consistent sets turn-out to be compatible with coevents which are the ontology of an alternative, histories based, formulation [2, 3, 4].
KeywordsConsistent histories Decoherent histories Contrary inferences
This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through Grant EP/K022717/1. Partial support from COST Action MP1006 is also gratefully acknowledged. The author is grateful to Robert Griffiths for his remarks concerning the conventional single-framework rule for consistent histories and to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
- 5.Dirac, P.A.M.: The Langrangian in quantum mechanics. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 3, 64–72 (1933)Google Scholar
- 9.Gell-Mann, M., Hartle, J.: Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. In: Zurek, W. (ed.) Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity, pp. 425–458. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Redwood City (1990)Google Scholar
- 18.Sorkin, R.D.: Quantum Classical Correspondence: Proceedings of the 4th Drexel Symposium on Quantum Nonintegrability, Philadelphia, September 8–11, 1994, pp. 229-251. International Press, Cambridge Mass, 1997. In Feng, D.H. and Hu, B-L. (eds.) gr-qc/9507057
- 22.Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J.: The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
- 24.Sorkin, R. D.: in G.F.R. Ellis, J. Murugan and A. Weltman (eds), Foundations of Space and Time (Cambridge University Press). preprint arxiv:1004.1226
- 28.Flori, C.: preprint arXiv:0812.1290 (2008)
- 31.Riedel, C.J., Zurek, W. and Zwolak, M.: preprint arXiv:1312.0331 (2013)