Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting Consistency Conditions for Quantum States of Systems on Closed Timelike Curves: An Epistemic Perspective

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been considerable recent interest in the consequences of closed timelike curves (CTCs) for the dynamics of quantum mechanical systems. A vast majority of research into this area makes use of the dynamical equations developed by Deutsch, which were developed from a consistency condition that assumes that mixed quantum states uniquely describe the physical state of a system. We criticize this choice of consistency condition from an epistemic perspective, i.e., a perspective in which the quantum state represents a state of knowledge about a system. We demonstrate that directly applying Deutsch’s condition when mixed states are treated as representing an observer’s knowledge of a system can conceal time travel paradoxes from the observer, rather than resolving them. To shed further light on the appropriate dynamics for quantum systems traversing CTCs, we make use of a toy epistemic theory with a strictly classical ontology due to Spekkens and show that, in contrast to the results of Deutsch, many of the traditional paradoxical effects of time travel are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An example of an information paradox is a scenario in which a physicist is given the plans to build a time machine and then uses those plans to go back in time and give himself the plans. In this case, the information required to build a time machine has spontaneously come into existence on a CTC.

  2. An explanation of this phenomenon within the Everett interpretation is that time travel always leads to particles traveling between branches of the ‘universal wave-function’ and so particles within a particular branch are no longer correlated because they were not prepared in an entangled state together (i.e., they were prepared in entangled states with copies of each other). However, this explanation obviously only applies to the Everett interpretation, as it requires branches of some ‘universal wave-function’ for particles to travel between.

References

  1. Gödel, K.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 447 (1949)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gott, J.R.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1126 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris, M.S., Thorne, K.S., Yurtsever, U.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ori, A.: Phys. Rev. D 76, 044002 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tipler, F.J.: Phys. Rev. D 9, 2203 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsch, D.: Phys. Rev. D 44, 3197 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Everett, H.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bacon, D.: Phys. Rev. A 70, 032309 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aaronson, S., Watrous, J.: Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 631 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Brun, T., Harrington, J., Wilde, M.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210402 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeJonghe, R., Frey, K., Imbo, T.: Phys. Rev. D 81, 087501 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Durham, I.: arXiv:0803.3287v3 [quant-ph]

  13. da Silva, R.D., Galvao, E.F., Kashefi, E.: Phys. Rev. A 83, 012316 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lloyd, S., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040403 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Svetlichny, G., et al.: arXiv:0902.4898v1 [quant-ph]

  16. Bennett, C.H., Leung, D., Smith, G., Smolin, J.A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 170502 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ralph, T.C.: Proc. SPIE 6305, 63050P (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuchs, C.A.: J. Mod. Opt. 50, 987 (2003)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Cavalcanti, E.G., Menicucci, N.C.: arXiv:1004.1219v4 [quant-ph]

  20. Harrigan, N., Spekkens, R.W.: Found. Phys. 40, 125 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Spekkens, R.W.: Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartlett, S.D., Rudolph, T., Spekkens, R.W.: arXiv:1111.5057v1 [quant-ph]

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge helpful discussions with Eric Cavalcanti and Nick Menicucci. S.D.B. acknowledges the support of the ARC and the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen D. Bartlett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallman, J.J., Bartlett, S.D. Revisiting Consistency Conditions for Quantum States of Systems on Closed Timelike Curves: An Epistemic Perspective. Found Phys 42, 656–673 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-012-9635-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-012-9635-y

Keywords

Navigation