Theory Assessment and Final Theory Claim in String Theory

Abstract

String theory has by now maintained a highly influential position in high energy physics for more than a quarter of a century. The present article analyses the reasons for the considerable trust exponents of string theory have in their theory even though it has neither found empirical confirmation nor a complete formulation up to this point. It is argued that this trust can be understood in terms of an emerging new conception of theory assessment that relies strongly on the identification of limitations to the underdetermination of scientific theory building. The second part of the paper makes the point that another conspicuous element of string theoretical reasoning, the prominent role of the notion of a final theory, can be understood in terms of this altered notion of theory assessment as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Carlip, S.: Black hole entropy and the problem of universality (2008). arXiv:0807.4192

  2. 2.

    Chalmers, D.: The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dawid, R.: Underdetermination and theory succession from the perspective of string theory. Philos. Sci. 73(3), 298–322 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dawid, R.: On the conflicting assessments of the current status of string theory. Philos. Sci. 76(5), 984–996 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dawid, R., Hartmann, S.: No alternative arguments (2011a, forthcoming)

  6. 6.

    Dawid, R., Hartmann, S.: No alternative arguments and meta-inductive reasoning in string theory (2011b, forthcoming)

  7. 7.

    Dyson, F.: The Scientist as a Rebel. Review Books, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gervais, J.L., Sakita, B.: Field theory interpretation of supergauges in dual models. Nucl. Phys. B 34, 632 (1971)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Green, M.B., Schwarz, J.H.: Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D=10 Gauge theory and superstring theory. Phys. Lett. B 149, 117 (1984)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Greene, B.: The Elegant Universe. W.W. Norton (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hawking, S., Mlodinov, L.: Grand Design. Bantam Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Horava, P.: Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point. Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009). arXiv:arXiv:0901.3775

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kaku, M.: Beyond Einstein: Superstrings and the Quest for the Final Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lakatos, I.: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Polchinski, J.: String Theory, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Polchinski, J.: Quantum gravity at the Planck length. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 2633 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9812104

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Penrose, R.: The Road to Reality. Vintage Books, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rescher, N.: The price of an ultimate theory. Philos. Nat. 37, 1–20 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rovelli, C., Smolin, L.: Loop space representation of quantum general relativity. Nucl. Phys. B 331, 80 (1990)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Smolin, L.: The Trouble with Physics. Houghton Mifflin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Strominger, A.: Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates. J. High Energy Phys. 9802, 009 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9712251

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Strominger, A., Vafa, C.: Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Phys. Lett. B 379, 99 (1996). arXiv:hep-th/9601029

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Susskind, L.: The anthropic landscape of string theory. In: Carr, B. (ed.) Universe or Multiverse? pp. 247–266. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0302219

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    ’t Hooft, G., Veltman, M.J.G.: Regularization and renormalisation of Gauge fields. Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189–213 (1972)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Weinberg, S.: A model of leptons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264–1266 (1967)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weinberg, S.: Dreams of a Final Theory. Vintage (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Witten, E.: Reflections on the Fate of Spacetime (1996). Reprinted in Callender, C., Huggett, N.: Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

  28. 28.

    Woit, P.: Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics. Jonathan Cape (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Dawid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawid, R. Theory Assessment and Final Theory Claim in String Theory. Found Phys 43, 81–100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9592-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • String theory
  • Underdetermination
  • Final theory claim