Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, 38:1065 | Cite as

Are Causality Violations Undesirable?

  • Hunter Monroe
Article

Abstract

Causality violations are typically seen as unrealistic and undesirable features of a physical model. The following points out three reasons why causality violations, which Bonnor and Steadman identified even in solutions to the Einstein equation referring to ordinary laboratory situations, are not necessarily undesirable. First, a space-time in which every causal curve can be extended into a closed causal curve is singularity free—a necessary property of a globally applicable physical theory. Second, a causality-violating space-time exhibits a nontrivial topology—no closed timelike curve (CTC) can be homotopic among CTCs to a point, or that point would not be causally well behaved—and nontrivial topology has been explored as a model of particles. Finally, if every causal curve in a given space-time passes through an event horizon, a property which can be called “causal censorship”, then that space-time with event horizons excised would still be causally well behaved.

Keywords

General relativity Differential geometry Spacetime topology 

References

  1. 1.
    Bonnor, W.B.: Closed timelike curves in classical relativity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12, 1705–1708 (2003) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonnor, W.B., Steadman, B.R.: The double-Kerr solution. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 2723–2732 (2004) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonnor, W.B., Steadman, B.R.: Exact solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with closed timelike curves. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37, 1833 (2005) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hawking, S.W., Ellis, G.F.R.: The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Senovilla, J.M.M.: Singularity theorems and their consequences. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 30, 701–848 (1998) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tipler, F.J.: Singularities and causality violation. Ann. Phys. 108, 1–36 (1977) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krasnikov, S.: The end of the time machine. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 4109 (2002) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geroch, R.: Topology in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 8, 782–786 (1967) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernal, A.N., Sanchez, M.: Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as causal instead of strongly causal. Class. Quantum Gravity 24, 745 (2007) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman, J.L., Schleich, K., Witt, D.M.: Topological censorship. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1486–1489 (1993) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Misner, C.W., Wheeler, J.A.: Classical physics as geometry: gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space. Ann. Phys. 2, 525–603 (1957) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lickorish, W.: Homeomorphisms of non-orientable two-manifolds. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 59, 307 (1963) zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibbons, G.W., Hawking, S.W.: Selection rules for topology change. Commun. Math. Phys. 148, 345–352 (1992) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibbons, G.W., Hawking, S.W.: Kinks and topology change. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1719–1721 (1992) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borde, A.: Topology change in classical general relativity. gr-qc/9406053 (1994)
  16. 16.
    Avez, A.: Essais de géométrie riemannienne hyperbolique globale. Applications a la relativité générale. Ann. Inst. Fourier 13, 105–190 (1963) zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Galloway, G.J.: Closed timelike geodesics. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 285, 379–388 (1984) zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia-Parrado, A., Senovilla, J.M.M.: Causal structures and causal boundaries. Class. Quantum Gravity 22, R1–R84 (2005) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flaherty, F.J.: Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 48, 199–202 (1975) zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, J.W.: Fundamental groups on a Lorentz manifold. Am. J. Math. 82, 873–890 (1967) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hawking, S., Penrose, R.: The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996) zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Monetary FundWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations