Abstract
The problem of explaining color perception has fascinated painters, philosophers and scientists throughout the history. In many cases, the ideas and discoveries about color perception in one of these categories influenced the others, thus resulting in one of the most remarkable cross-fertilization of human thought. At the end of the nineteenth century, two models stood out as the most convincing ones: Young-Helmholtz’s trichromacy on one side, and Hering’s opponency on the other side. The former was mainly supported by painters and scientists, although with some noticeable exceptions as, e.g., Otto Runge, while the majority of philosophers supported the latter. These two apparently incompatible models were proven to be two complementary parts of the hugely complex chain of events which leads to human color perception. Recently, a rigorous mathematical theory able to incorporate both trichromacy and opponency has been developed thanks to the use of the language and tools of quantum information. In this paper, we discuss the placement of this model within the philosophical theories about color.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Auletta, G., Fortunato, M., & Parisi, G. (2009). Quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Averill, E. W. (2005). Toward a projectivist account of color. Journal of Philosophy, 102(5), 217–234.
Averill, E., & Hazlett, A. (2011). Color objectivism and color projectivism. Philosophical Psychology, 24(6), 751–765.
Baumann, C. (1992). Ewald Herings Gegenfarben [Ewald Hering’s opponent colors. History of an idea]. Geschichte Einer Idee. Ophthalmologe, 89(3), 249–252.
Berthier, M., & Provenzi, E. (2019). When geometry meets psycho-physics and quantum mechanics: Modern perspectives on the space of perceived colors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 621–630, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
Berthier, M. (2020). Geometry of color perception. Part 2: perceived colors from real quantum states and Hering’s rebit. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 10(1), 1–25.
Berthier, M., Garcin, V., Prencipe, N., & Provenzi, E. (2021). The relativity of color perception. Journal of Mathematical Psychology., 103, 102562.
Berthier, M., Prencipe, N., & Provenzi, E. (2022). A quantum information-based refoundation of color perception concepts. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences., 15(4), 1944–1976.
Berthier, M., & Provenzi, E. (2021a). From Riemannian trichromacy to quantum color opponency via hyperbolicity. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 63(6), 681–688.
Berthier, M., & Provenzi, E. (2021b). The Quantum Nature of Color Perception: Uncertainty Relations for Chromatic Opposition. Journal of Imaging, 7(2), 40. MDPI.
Berthier, M., & Provenzi, E. (2022). Quantum measurement and colour perception: Theory and applications. Proceedings of the Royal Society a., 478(2258), 20210508.
Boghossian, P. A., & Velleman, J. D. (1989). Color as a secondary quality. Mind, 98(January), 81–103.
Buchsbaum, G., & Gottschalk, A. (1983). Trichromacy, opponent colours coding and optimum colour information transmission in the retina. Proc. Royal Society of London B, 220, 89–113.
Byrne, A., & Hilbert, D. R. (2003). Color realism and color science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(1), 3–21.
Byrne, A., & Hilbert, D. R. (2021). Objectivist reductionism. In F. Macpherson & D. Brown (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Color. London: Routledge.
Cohen, J. D. (2009). The red and the real: An essay on color ontology. Oxford University Press UK.
Descartes, R. (1637). “Optics”, in Adam, Ch. & Tannery, Paul (1897). Oeuvres de Descartes. J. Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1644). [1988], Principles of Philosophy, reprinted in John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny (eds.), Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160–212.
Dirac, PAM. (1930). The principles of quantum mechanics. In No. 27 in international series of monographs on physics (4th ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Grassmann, H. (1853). Zur theorie der farbenmischung. Annalen Der Physik, 165(5), 69–84.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A history of greek philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Hardin, C. L. (1984). A new look at color. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(2), 125–133.
Hardin, C. L. (1988). Color for Philosophers: Unweaving the Rainbow. Hackett.
Helmholtz, H.V. (1866). Treatise on Physiological Optics, Vol. 1 (1855), Vol. 2 (1860), Vol. 3. Trans. James P. Cocke, Mineola (New York): Dover Publications Inc, 1962 and repr. 2005.
Hering, E. (1878). Outlines of a theory of light sense. Trans. by Leo M. Hurvich and Dorothea Jameson, Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press, 1872/1964.
Hering, E. (1878). Outline of a theory of the light sense, p.49. Translated by Leo M. Hurvich and Dorothea Jameson, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1964.
Hilbert, D. R. (1987). Color and color perception: A study in anthropocentric realism. Csli Press.
Hyman, J. (2006). The objective eye: Color, form, and reality in the theory of art. University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, F., & Pargetter, R. (1987). An objectivist’s guide to subjectivism about color. Revue Internationale De Philosophie, 41(1), 127–141.
Kalderon, M. E. (2015). Form without Matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception. Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1997). Naming the colors. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 75, 325–342.
Locke, J. (1689). An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Edited by R. Woolhouse. London: Penguin.
Mahon, B. (2003). The man who changed everything. Wiley.
Maund, B. (2006). The illusory theory of colors: An anti-realist theory. Dialectica, 60(3), 245–268.
Maund, B. (2011). Colour eliminativism. In L. Nolan (Ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford University Press.
McLaughlin, B. P. (2003). Color, consciousness, and color consciousness. In Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 97–154). Oxford University Press.
Mermin, D. (1985). Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory. Physics Today, 38(4), 38–47.
Newton, I. (1704). Opticks. Pantianos Classics 2017 edition.
Noë, R. A. (1994). Wittgenstein, phenomenology and what it makes sense to say. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54(1), 1–42.
Pasnau, R. (2007). Democritus and secondary qualities. Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie, 89(2), 99–121.
Peruzzi, G., & Roberti, V. (2023). Helmholtz and the geometry of color space: Gestation and development of Helmholtz’s line element. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 77(2), 201–220.
Provenzi, E. (2020). Geometry of color perception. Part 1: Structures and metrics of a homogeneous color space. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience., 10(1), 1–19.
Provenzi, E., Delon, J., Gousseau, Y., & Mazin, B. (2016). On the second order spatiochromatic structure of natural images. Vision Research, 120, 22–38.
Resnikoff, H. L. (1974). Differential geometry and color perception. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 1, 97–131.
Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. Enhanced media 2016.
Schopenhauer, A. (2010). On vision and colors. Princeton Architectural Press.
Schrödinger, E. (1920). Outline of a theory of colour measurement for daylight vision. Annalen Der Physik., 6(4), 397–456.
Turner, S. (1994). In the Eye’s Mind: Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy. UK: Princeton University Press.
Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, Color, and Content. MIT Press.
von Goethe, J. W. (1970). Theory of color. UK: The MIT Press.
von Helmholtz, H. (1852). Über die Theorie der zusammengesetzten Farben. Annalen Der Physik, 163(9), 45–66.
von Helmholtz, H. (1868). The recent progress of the theory of vision. Trans. by E. Atkinson. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1873, 127–203.
Westphal, J. (2016). Wittgenstein on Color. In H.-J. Glock & J. Hyman (Eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Wiley.
Weyl, H. (1934). Mind and nature, selected writings on philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Princeton University Press 2009.
Wittgenstein, L. (1929). Some Remarks on Logical Form. Aristotelian Society, Supplementary, 9(1), 162–171.
Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Philosophical Remarks. University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Remarks on colour. Blackwell publishing.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the preliminary version of this paper.
Funding
No funding has been received for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.P., M.B. and E.P. contributed equally to the Abstract, Introduction, section 2.1 to 2.3 and the conclusions. F.P. wrote section 2 and 3.1, M.B. and E.P. wrote section 3.2. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pelucchi, F., Berthier, M. & Provenzi, E. On the Philosophical Standpoint of a Recent Mathematical Color Perception Model. Found Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09951-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09951-2