Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematics and Experience

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of whether mathematics depends on experience, including experience of the external world, is problematic because, while it is clear that natural sciences depend on experience, it is not clear that mathematics depends on experience. Indeed, several mathematicians and philosophers think that mathematics does not depend on experience, and this is also the view of mainstream philosophy of mathematics. However, this view has had a deleterious effect on the philosophy of mathematics. This article argues that, in fact, the view is not valid. Mathematics depends on experience because experience influences the making of mathematics, indeed much mathematics arises from experience and is evaluated on the basis of experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Atiyah, M. (2004). Interview. In M. Raussen, & C. Skau. Interview with Michael Atiyah and Isadore Singer. Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society, 53, 24–30.

  • Atiyah, M., et al. (1994). Responses to: A. Jaffe, & Quinn, F., theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30, 178–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, M., Dijkgraaf, R., & Hitchin, N. (2010). Geometry and physics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 368, 913–926.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L. E. J. (1975). Collected works 1: Philosophy and foundation of mathematics. North-Holland.

  • Cellucci, C. (2007). La Filosofia della matematica del novecento. Laterza.

  • Cellucci, C. (2013). Rethinking logic. Logic in relation to mathematics, evolution, and method. Springer.

  • Cellucci, C. (2022). The making of mathematics: Heuristic philosophy of mathematics. Springer.

  • Cellucci, C. (2023). Introducing heuristic philosophy of mathematics. Annals of Mathematics and Philosophy, 1, 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clagett, M. (1999). Ancient Egyptian science: A source book, Volume 3: Ancient Egyptian mathematics. American Philosophical Society.

  • Dummett, M. (2010). The nature and future of philosophy. Columbia University Press.

  • Frege, G. (1960). The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number. Harper.

  • Frege, G. (1967). Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought. In van J. Heijenoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel. A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (pp. 5––82). Harvard University Press.

  • Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous writings. Blackwell.

  • Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and mathematical correspondence. Blackwell.

  • Frege, G. (1984). Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy. Blackwell.

  • Frege, G. (2013). Basic laws of arithmetic: Derived using concept-script. Oxford University Press.

  • George, A., & Velleman, D. J. (2002). Philosophies of mathematics. Blackwell.

  • Giaquinto, M. (2002). The search for certainty: A philosophical account of foundations of mathematics. Oxford University Press.

  • Hersh, R. (1979). Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics. Advances in Mathematics, 31, 31–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? Oxford University Press.

  • Hersh, R. (2014). Experiencing mathematics: What do we do, when we do mathematics? American Mathematical Society, 2014.

  • Hilbert, D. (1996a). The new grounding of mathematics: First report. In W. Ewald (Ed.), From Brouwer to Hilbert: A source book in the foundations of mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 1117–1134). Oxford University Press.

  • Hilbert, D. (1996b). The logical foundations of mathematics. In W. Ewald (Ed.), From Brouwer to Hilbert: A source book in the foundations of mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 1134–1148). Oxford University Press.

  • Hilbert, D. (2004). Grundlagen der Euklidischen Geometrie. In M.l Hallett, & U. Majer (Eds.), David Hilbert’s lectures on the foundations of geometry 1891–1902 (pp. 221–286). Springer.

  • Hilbert, D. (2013). Lectures on the foundations of arithmetic and logic 1917–1933. Springer.

  • Hilbert, D., & Bernays, P. (1968–1970). Grundlagen der Mathematik. Springer.

  • Hintikka, J., & Remes, U. (1974). The method of analysis: Its geometrical origin and its general significance. Reidel.

  • Klenk, V. (1990). What mathematical truth need not be. In M. Dunn, & A. Gupta (Eds.), Truth or consequences essays in honor of Nuel Belnap (pp. 197–208). Kluwer.

  • Knorr, W. (1993). The ancient tradition of geometric problems. Dover.

  • Lakatos, I. (1961). Essays in the logic of mathematical discovery, PhD thesis. Cambridge University.

  • Mac Lane, S. (1986). Mathematics: Form and function. Springer.

  • Monk, J. D. (1976). Mathematical logic. Springer.

  • Rédei, M. (2020). On the tension between physics and mathematics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 51, 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rota, G. C. (1997). Indiscrete thoughts. Springer.

  • Russell, B. (1971). Autobiography. Allen & Unwin.

  • Todayama, K. (2015). What is experimental philosophy of mathematics? Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, 23, 53–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2022). The philosophy of philosophy. Wiley.

  • Zweig, S. (1964). The world of yesterday: An autobiography. University of Nebraska Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for many valuable suggestions that have helped me to improve the paper.

Funding

No funding was received for the preparation of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This paper is entirely due to the author, Carlo Cellucci.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Cellucci.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cellucci, C. Mathematics and Experience. Found Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09943-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09943-2

Keywords

Navigation